Two-service analytical model for partially-shared elastic optical link spectrum

Elastic Optical Networks (EONs) have the potential to improve the fiber spectrum utilization by allocating spectrum resources to multiple traffic requests proportionally to the amount of carried traffic. However, achieving high spectrum utilization in this elastic scenario is hindered by the resulting spectrum fragmentation. A number of studies have addressed and made attempts to mitigate spectrum fragmentation. Most of these studies are based on simulation techniques and target the overall blocking probability experienced by the offered traffic requests due to the lack of available spectrum resources. Some studies have also shown that blocking probability in EON can be uneven, i.e., high-rate circuit requests are more likely to be blocked when compared to low-rate requests due to the shortage of contiguously available spectrum resources. The contribution of this paper is to extend an existing Markov Chain (MC) model previously proposed by the authors to quantify blocking probability in a two-service elastic fiber link. The model extension accounts for a self-limited and partial sharing of the fiber spectrum to accommodate the two types of service. The MC model is used to quantify both the blocking probability and its fairness across the two types of service, documenting how the EON uneven blocking behavior can be significantly mitigated by performing partial (as opposed to full) sharing of the fiber spectrum.

[1]  S. J. B. Yoo,et al.  Fragmentation-aware routing, modulation and spectrum assignment algorithms in elastic optical networks , 2013, 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC).

[2]  Eiji Oki,et al.  An Analytical Model of Spectrum Fragmentation in a Two-Service Elastic Optical Link , 2014, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[3]  Arunabha Sen,et al.  Analysis of on-line routing and spectrum allocation in spectrum-sliced optical networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[4]  Lena Wosinska,et al.  Spectrum allocation policy modeling for elastic optical networks , 2012, High Capacity Optical Networks and Emerging/Enabling Technologies.

[5]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Elastic optical networking: a new dawn for the optical layer? , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Franco Callegati,et al.  Trunk Reservation for Fair Utilization in Flexible Optical Networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  Andrea Fumagalli,et al.  Spectrum fragmentation analysis in a two-rate elastic optical link , 2015 .

[8]  Hiroshi Hasegawa,et al.  A Novel Semi-flexible Grid Optical Path Network That Utilizes Aligned Frequency Slot Arrangement , 2013 .

[9]  Andrea Fumagalli,et al.  Blocking probability and fairness in two-rate Elastic Optical Networks , 2014, 2014 16th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[10]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Spectrum-efficient and scalable elastic optical path network: architecture, benefits, and enabling technologies , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Andrea Fumagalli,et al.  Blocking fairness in two-service EONs with uneven arrival rates , 2015, 2015 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON).

[12]  Yuefeng Ji,et al.  Exact performance analytical model for spectrum allocation in flexible grid optical networks , 2014 .