Energy poverty and perceptions of solar power in marginalized communities: Survey evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India

The decreased cost of solar electricity generation has given a boost to rural energy markets, but most off-grid businesses remain small. A larger customer base is a precondition for business expansion and access to finance. This article reports findings from a large survey focused on energy access in unelectrified habitations in the Barabanki district of Uttar Pradesh, India. While most villagers are dissatisfied with their kerosene lighting and the median monthly expense for this fuel is 100 rupees (USD ∼ 1.66), the data analysis also indicates that there is little trust in local companies and a large number of villagers prefer government leadership in electricity supply. These findings suggest that solar entrepreneurs must do more to demonstrate the quality of their products and services to villagers to expand their customer base.

[1]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Energising Rural India Using Distributed Generation: The Case of Solar Mini-Grids in Chhattisgarh State, India , 2014 .

[2]  Bradford L. Barham,et al.  Knowledge and adoption of solar home systems in rural Nicaragua , 2011 .

[3]  J. Coopersmith,et al.  The Electrification of Russia, 1880-1926 , 1992 .

[4]  M. Asaduzzaman,et al.  The Benefits of Solar Home Systems:An Analysis from Bangladesh , 2013 .

[5]  Hisham Zerriffi,et al.  Rural Electrification: Strategies for Distributed Generation , 2010 .

[6]  Douglas F. Barnes,et al.  The Challenge of Rural Electrification: Strategies for Developing Countries , 2007 .

[7]  D. Palit Solar energy programs for rural electrification: Experiences and lessons from South Asia , 2013 .

[8]  John Byrne,et al.  Energy-microfinance intervention for below poverty line households in India , 2009 .

[9]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Early Adopters of Solar Panels in Developing Countries: Evidence from Tanzania , 2014 .

[10]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  The Chinese electricity access model for rural electrification: Approach, experience and lessons for others. , 2012 .

[11]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power , 2013 .

[12]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Solar home systems for rural India: Survey evidence on awareness and willingness to pay from Uttar Pradesh ☆ , 2015 .

[13]  Jennifer N. Brass,et al.  Power for Development: A Review of Distributed Generation Projects in the Developing World , 2012 .

[14]  Atul Kumar,et al.  Going beyond incomes: Dimensions of cooking energy transitions in rural India , 2014 .

[15]  A. Jacobson Connective Power: Solar Electrification and Social Change in Kenya , 2004 .

[16]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Grid and off-grid electrification: An integrated model with applications to India , 2014 .

[17]  Victoria Gómez García,et al.  Rural electrification systems based on renewable energy: The social dimensions of an innovative technology , 2010 .

[18]  Erik O. Ahlgren,et al.  Evaluation of Indian rural solar electrification: A case study in Chhattisgarh , 2012 .

[19]  Florian Taübe,et al.  Exploring the link between products and services in low-income markets—Evidence from solar home systems , 2013 .

[20]  Elizabeth Chatterjee Dissipated energy: Indian electric power and the politics of blame , 2012 .

[21]  Balkrishna C. Rao,et al.  How disruptive is frugal , 2013 .