Kinematic characteristics of Andalusian, Arabian and Anglo-Arabian horses: a comparative study.

The aim of this study was to compare the kinematic trot characteristics of three different breeds of horse: Andalusian (AN, n = 15), Arabian (AR, n = 7) and Anglo-Arabian (AA, n = 5) using standard computer-assisted videography (25 Hz). Linear, temporal and angular parameters in fore- and hind limbs were analysed in six randomly selected strides per horse. Normalised angle-time diagrams along the complete stride were obtained for all joints angles in each breed and specific kinematic characteristics were detected graphically. AA horses displayed longer swing durations in both limbs ans a shorter angular range of motion (ARM) in scapula and pelvis inclination and in shoulder, hip and forelimb retraction-protraction angles. At lift off, stifle and tarsal joint angles were more flexed. In general, only small differences were observed in AR horse kinematics when compared with the other 2 breeds. AN horses presented negative overtracking length, which was positive in AR and AA. In AN horses the elbow and carpal joints were more flexed at the moment of maximal elevation, elbow and fore-fetlock joints also exhibited a larger ARM due to a smaller angle at maximal flexion. In the hind limbs, tarsal, hind fetlock and retraction-protraction angles presented a larger ARM in AN horses due to greater maximal flexion in the tarsal and hind fetlock joints. Fore- and hind fetlocks were also more flexed in horses from this breed. In conclusion, differences between kinematic variables at the trot were observed in the three breeds studied here, mainly in forelimb joints. The most outstanding feature was the greater forelimb flexion recorded in AN horses than in the other breeds which is consistent with the elevated movements in this breed. In AA horses, the ARM of proximal joints involved in retraction protraction in both fore- and hind limbs was smaller. All the differences observed highlighted the idiosyncratic nature of the trot in each breed; this may influence the functional capacity of each breed.

[1]  H. Clayton,et al.  The effect of an acute hoof wall angulation on the stride kinematics of trotting horses. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[2]  F. Castejón,et al.  A comparative study of aerobic capacity and fitness in three different horse breeds (Andalusian, Arabian and Anglo-Arabian). , 1994, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[3]  H C Schamhardt,et al.  Kinematic detection of superior gait quality in young trotting warmbloods. , 1994, The Veterinary quarterly.

[4]  S. Drevemo,et al.  Biokinematic analysis of the Swedish Warmblood riding horse at trot. , 1994, Equine veterinary journal.

[5]  J. Rooney.  The angulation of the forefoot and pastern of the horse , 1984 .

[6]  D. Leach,et al.  Relationships between stride length, stride frequency, velocity, and morphometrics of foals. , 1986, American Journal of Veterinary Research.

[7]  E.P.C. Koenen,et al.  Genetic parameters of linear scored conformation traits and their relation to dressage and show-jumping performance in the Dutch Warmblood Riding Horse population , 1995 .

[8]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  How the horse moves: 2. Significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics. , 1995, Equine veterinary journal.

[9]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Kinematics of the standardbred trotter measured at 6, 7, 8 and 9 m/s on a treadmill, before and after 5 months of prerace training. , 1993, Acta anatomica.

[10]  A. Hiraga,et al.  Relationships between Stride Frequency, Stride Length, Step Length and Velocity with Asymmetric Gaits in the Thoroughbred Horse , 1992 .

[11]  F. Miró,et al.  Comparative biokinematic study of young and adult Andalusian horses at the trot. , 1999, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[12]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  Quantification of the locomotion of Dutch Warmblood foals. , 1993, Acta anatomica.

[13]  J. Philipsson,et al.  Relationships between conformation, performance and health in 4-year-old swedish warmblood riding horses , 1993 .

[14]  I. Fredricson,et al.  Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged as good and poor at the trot , 1994 .

[15]  F. Miró,et al.  Differences between Breeds(Dutch Warmblood vs Andalusian Purebred) in Forelimb Kinematics. , 1997 .

[16]  F. Miró,et al.  Comparative study of muscle fiber type composition in the middle gluteal muscle of andalusian, thoroughbred and arabian horses , 1989 .

[17]  B. Escribano,et al.  Locomotor, cardiocirculatory and metabolic adaptations to training in Andalusian and Anglo-Arabian horses. , 1999, Research in veterinary science.

[18]  J Philipsson,et al.  Variation in conformation of Swedish warmblood horses and conformational characteristics of élite sport horses. , 1990, Equine veterinary journal.

[19]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  A quantitative analysis of skin displacement in the trotting horse. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[20]  H. Schamhardt,et al.  The influence of conformation on fore and hind limb kinematics of the trotting Dutch Warmblood horse , 1996 .

[21]  F. Miró,et al.  Angular joint parameters in the andalusian horse at walk, obtained by normal videography , 1996 .