Optimized outcome prediction in breast cancer by combining the 70-gene signature with clinical risk prediction algorithms

Clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment differ in their selection of patients at a high risk of recurrence who are eligible to receive adjuvant systemic treatment (AST). The 70-gene signature is a molecular tool to better guide AST decisions. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms can optimize outcome prediction and consequently treatment decisions in early stage, node-negative breast cancer patients. A 70-gene signature was available for 427 patients participating in the RASTER study (cT1-3N0M0). Median follow-up was 61.6 months. Based on 5-year distant-recurrence free interval (DRFI) probabilities survival areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated and compared for risk estimations based on the six clinical risk prediction algorithms: Adjuvant! Online (AOL), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), St. Gallen (2003), the Dutch National guidelines (CBO 2004 and NABON 2012), and PREDICT plus. Also, survival AUC were calculated after adding the 70-gene signature to these clinical risk estimations. Systemically untreated patients with a high clinical risk estimation but a low risk 70-gene signature had an excellent 5-year DRFI varying between 97.1 and 100 %, depending on the clinical risk prediction algorithms used in the comparison. The best risk estimation was obtained in this cohort by adding the 70-gene signature to CBO 2012 (AUC: 0.644) and PREDICT (AUC: 0.662). Clinical risk estimations by all clinical algorithms improved by adding the 70-gene signature. Patients with a low risk 70-gene signature have an excellent survival, independent of their clinical risk estimation. Adding the 70-gene signature to clinical risk prediction algorithms improves risk estimations and therefore might improve the identification of early stage node-negative breast cancer patients for whom AST has limited value. In this cohort, the PREDICT plus tool in combination with the 70-gene signature provided the best risk prediction.

[1]  Karen A Gelmon,et al.  Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Commercialized multigene predictors of clinical outcome for breast cancer. , 2008, The oncologist.

[3]  S. Mook,et al.  Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  L. V. van't Veer,et al.  Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  J. Wesseling,et al.  A prospective evaluation of a breast cancer prognosis signature in the observational RASTER study , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[6]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Risk estimations and treatment decisions in early stage breast cancer: agreement among oncologists and the impact of the 70-gene signature. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[7]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Additional value and potential use of the 70-gene prognosis signature in node-negative breast cancer in daily clinical practice. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[9]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: international consensus panel on the treatment of primary breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  S. Cross,et al.  PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2 , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  R. Gelber,et al.  Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  I. O. Ellis,et al.  Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  The impact of inter-observer variation in pathological assessment of node-negative breast cancer on clinical risk assessment and patient selection for adjuvant systemic treatment. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Wim H van Harten,et al.  Use of 70-gene signature to predict prognosis of patients with node-negative breast cancer: a prospective community-based feasibility study (RASTER). , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Yudong D. He,et al.  A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer , 2002 .

[18]  Sally Hunsberger,et al.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  C. Giardina,et al.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[20]  M. K. Tuut,et al.  Richtlijn behandeling van het mammacarcinoom , 2008 .