Air quality assessment in passenger trains: the impact of smokestack emissions

The influence of the smokestack emissions of a ground-level train in the air quality of the passenger carriages through the ventilation system was investigated in this work. To this end, a monitoring campaign was designed and implemented at 20 different in-train sites, e.g., conductor’s cabin, carriages with passenger seats, boarding carriages, spaces for disabled people, etc., during its journey between urban and rural areas. Measurements of inorganic (NOx, SO2, CO) and organic (benzene, polyaromatic hydrocarbons, total volatile organic compounds) compounds as well as airborne particulate matter (PM) in different size ranges (ΡΜ10, ΡΜ2.5, ΡΜ1) were carried out in the interior of the carriages of a diesel engine-powered train (type KAT 2000) during fixed round trips. An exhaust dispersion cone hook was used for intervention purposes leading to the reassessment of the in-train air quality at the most contaminated sites. In order to produce reliable and comparable data, targeted measurements were conducted in a railbus which was used as reference. Based on the analysis, the air pollutants and particle levels exhibit significant variations at the same sampling point during the train journey, possibly due to the route characteristics (tunnels, uphills, turns, speed). Significant spatial fluctuations in the same train depending on the position and the proximity to the smokestack plume and the ventilation system inlet were observed as well. It is worthy to note that decreased pollutant values were observed during the intervention.

[1]  Paul Hewett,et al.  Rating Locomotive Crew Diesel Emission Exposure Profiles Using Statistics and Bayesian Decision Analysis , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[2]  C. Y. Chan,et al.  Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[3]  S. Zou,et al.  Exposure level of carbon monoxide and respirable suspended particulate in public transportation modes while commuting in urban area of Guangzhou, China , 2002 .

[4]  L. Chan,et al.  Commuter exposure to aromatic VOCs in public transportation modes in Hong Kong. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  L. Chan,et al.  Preliminary measurements of aromatic VOCs in public transportation modes in Guangzhou, China. , 2003, Environment international.

[6]  P G Flachsbart,et al.  Carbon monoxide exposures of Washington commuters. , 1987, JAPCA.

[7]  B. Festy,et al.  Exposure of City Residents to Carbon Monoxide and Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons during Commuting Trips in the Paris Metropolitan Area , 1995 .

[8]  Yu-Hsiang Cheng,et al.  Levels of PM10 and PM2.5 in Taipei Rapid Transit System , 2008 .

[9]  K. Siegmann,et al.  Suspended particulate matter in railway coaches , 2002 .

[10]  J. Bartzis,et al.  PAHs sources contribution to the air quality of an office environment: experimental results and receptor model (PMF) application , 2010 .

[11]  Jin-Long Li,et al.  Air quality in passenger cars of the ground railway transit system in Beijing, China. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  M R Ashmore,et al.  Exposure of commuters to carbon monoxide in Mexico City II. Comparison of in-vehicle and fixed-site concentrations. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[13]  Zhaorong Liu,et al.  IN-TRAIN AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE RAILWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM IN BEIJING: A NOTE , 2007 .

[14]  Dong-Uk Park,et al.  Characteristics of PM10, PM2.5, CO2 and CO monitored in interiors and platforms of subway train in Seoul, Korea. , 2008, Environment international.