Students’ writing and reading preferences in a paperless classroom

ABSTRACT This study took place in a school which adopted a “paperless classroom” policy. The purpose of the study was to examine whether students who learn in a paperless classroom really prefer reading and writing on computers rather than on paper and whether their preferences differ according to contextual conditions and personal differences. The findings show that students’ reading and writing preferences depended on the context in which the reading or writing was performed. The boys preferred to read and write on the computer significantly more than girls. Conversely, the girls’ handwriting skills and preference for handwriting were higher than the boys’. Reading and writing on computer was found to be favored among strong students, while weak students tended to prefer using paper. This research also revealed a rapid decrease in favoring computer over paper in both reading and writing over time. Students who had experienced the paperless classroom policy in this school for three years were less supportive of the use of computers for reading and writing than younger students.

[1]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[2]  Yong Zhao,et al.  One-to-One Computing: What Does it Bring to Schools? , 2008 .

[3]  Nora Mogey,et al.  Handwriting or typing exams – can we give students the choice? , 2008 .

[4]  Janet M. Ferguson,et al.  Middle school students’ reactions to a 1:1 iPad initiative and a paperless curriculum , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[5]  Ágústa Pálsdóttir,et al.  Print vs. Digital Preferences. Study Material and Reading Behavior of Students at the University of Iceland , 2016, ECIL.

[6]  Betty Shrieber,et al.  Word Processing as an Assistive Technology Tool for Enhancing Academic Outcomes of Students with Writing Disabilities in the General Classroom , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  Miri Shonfeld,et al.  The Voice of Teachers in a Paperless Classroom , 2017 .

[8]  Cornwell Dr,et al.  Implementing Bring Your Own Device and the Paperless Classroom: A Change Leadership Project , 2015 .

[9]  Anne Mangen,et al.  Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension , 2013 .

[10]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[11]  Carrie Spencer,et al.  Research on Learners' Preferences for Reading from a Printed Text or from a Computer Screen. , 2006 .

[12]  Chris J. Pilgrim,et al.  Pedagogy! iPadology! Netbookology! Learning with mobile devices , 2013 .

[13]  Todd A. Finkle,et al.  Lessons Learned from "The Oracle of Omaha" Warren Buffett. , 2010 .

[14]  Wei Cheng,et al.  A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? , 2014, Journal of Computers in Education.

[15]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[16]  Yanjie Song,et al.  "Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)" for seamless science inquiry in a primary school , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Jeff Whittingham,et al.  Digital Writing in the Early Grades: What Emergent Writers Can Teach Us , 2013 .

[18]  Jeremy Fei Wang Creating a Paperless Classroom with the Best of Two Worlds. , 2010 .

[19]  M. Green,et al.  Digital natives , 2012, BDJ.

[20]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[21]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Special Edition: Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings , 2010 .

[22]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Laptops and Fourth-Grade Literacy: Assisting the Jump over the Fourth-Grade Slump. , 2010 .

[23]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[24]  David Waterman,et al.  Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: Cost-efficiency and perceived learning , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Servel Miller,et al.  Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges , 2017 .

[26]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Internet Activities and Developmental Predictors: Gender Differences Among Digital Natives , 2011 .

[27]  James Hartley,et al.  Sex Differences in Handwriting: a comment on Spear , 1991 .

[28]  Mathew Hillier,et al.  The very idea of e-Exams: Student (pre)conceptions , 2014 .

[29]  Irma S. Jones,et al.  Going green: paperless technology and feedback from the classroom , 2012 .

[30]  Amelito G Enriquez,et al.  Enhancing Student Performance Using Tablet Computers , 2010 .

[31]  Margaret Goddard Spear,et al.  Differences between the Written Work of Boys and Girls , 1989 .

[32]  Nick De Bonis,et al.  Going Green: Managing a Paperless Classroom. , 2011 .

[33]  Joseph Slowinski If You Got IT Flaunt IT: Construction of a Paperless Classroom , 2000 .

[34]  Nora Mogey,et al.  Students’ choices between typing and handwriting in examinations , 2012 .