Recursive Self-feedback Improved Speech Fluency in Two Patients with Chronic Nonfluent Aphasia

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies have demonstrated that people with nonfluent aphasia (PWNA) improve their language production after repeating personalized scripts, modeled by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). If PWNA could improve by using their own self-feedback, relying less on external feedback, barriers to aphasia treatment, such as a dearth of clinicians and mobility issues, can be overcome. Here we examine whether PWNA improve their language production through an automated procedure that exposes them to playbacks of their own speech, which are updated recursively, without any feedback from SLPs. Method We tested if recursive self-feedback could improve speech fluency in two persons with chronic nonfluent aphasia. We compared two treatments: script production with recursive self-feedback (a new technique) and a non-self-feedback training. We administered the treatments remotely to the participants through their smartphones using two versions of a mobile app we developed. Each participant engaged in each treatment for about three weeks. We estimated clinical improvements of script production through a quantitative trend analysis and nonoverlap of all pairs. Results Recursive self-feedback improved speaking rate and speech initiation latency of trained and untrained scripts in both participants. The control (non-self-feedback) training was also effective, but it induced a somewhat weaker improvement in speaking rate, and improved speech initiation latency in only one participant. Conclusion Our findings provide preliminary evidence that PWNA can improve their speaking rate and speech initiation latency during production of scripts via fully automated recursive self-feedback. The beneficial effects of recursive self-feedback training suggest that speech unison and repeated exposures to written scripts may be optional ingredients of script-based treatments for aphasia.

[1]  R. Behroozmand,et al.  Impairment of speech auditory feedback error detection and motor correction in post-stroke aphasia. , 2021, Journal of communication disorders.

[2]  W. Fitch,et al.  Vocal learning in animals and humans , 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[3]  R. Behroozmand,et al.  Slowed Compensation Responses to Altered Auditory Feedback in Post-Stroke Aphasia: Implications for Speech Sensorimotor Integration. , 2020, Journal of communication disorders.

[4]  Lori A. Nelson,et al.  Can Script Training Improve Narrative and Conversation in Aphasia across Etiology? , 2019, Seminars in Speech and Language.

[5]  A. Frizzo,et al.  Impact of auditory feedback alterations in individuals with stuttering , 2019, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[6]  Erin L. Meier,et al.  Nonlinguistic Cognitive Factors Predict Treatment-Induced Recovery in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia. , 2019, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  C. Thompson,et al.  Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[8]  D. Timmann,et al.  Speech treatment improves dysarthria in multisystemic ataxia: a rater-blinded, controlled pilot-study in ARSACS , 2019, Journal of Neurology.

[9]  S. Kiran,et al.  Assessing speech correction abilities with acoustic analyses: Evidence of preserved online correction in persons with aphasia , 2018, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[10]  I. Martins,et al.  Cognitive performance and aphasia recovery , 2018, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[11]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Sensorimotor impairment of speech auditory feedback processing in aphasia , 2018, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. C. Cardoso,et al.  Efeito da retroalimentação auditiva atrasada na fala e leitura de taquifêmicos , 2017 .

[13]  Ofer Tchernichovski,et al.  Statistical learning in songbirds: from self-tutoring to song culture , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Dopamine neurons encode performance error in singing birds , 2016, Science.

[15]  Rosalind C. Kaye,et al.  Impact of Personal Relevance on Acquisition and Generalization of Script Training for Aphasia: A Preliminary Analysis. , 2015, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[16]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Speech entrainment compensates for Broca's area damage , 2015, Cortex.

[17]  Μαρία Πιτοπούλου,et al.  Μελέτη των διαταραχών του λόγου σε ασθενείς με ανοϊκά σύνδρομα με τη χρήση του Western Aphasia Battery - Revised , 2014 .

[18]  Rosalind C. Kaye,et al.  Acquisition and maintenance of scripts in aphasia: a comparison of two cuing conditions. , 2014, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[19]  A. Doupe,et al.  Translating birdsong: songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical research. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  A neural theory of speech acquisition and production , 2012, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[22]  G. Hickok Computational neuroanatomy of speech production , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Albert,et al.  Language as a stressor in aphasia , 2011, Aphasiology.

[24]  Gina L. Youmans,et al.  Script training treatment for adults with apraxia of speech. , 2011, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[25]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Predicting the outcome of anomia therapy for people with aphasia post CVA: Both language and cognitive status are key predictors , 2010, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[26]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. , 2009, Behavior therapy.

[27]  P. Mitra,et al.  De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch , 2009, Nature.

[28]  Leora R Cherney,et al.  Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[29]  Kathleen L. Anderson,et al.  Syntactic complexity during conversation of boys with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[31]  William D. Hula,et al.  Translational research in aphasia: from neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  M. L. Ralph,et al.  The importance of memory and executive function in aphasia: evidence from the treatment of anomia using errorless and errorful learning. , 2007 .

[33]  M. Bourgeois,et al.  Script training and automaticity in two individuals with aphasia , 2005 .

[34]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Learned Birdsong and the Neurobiology of Human Language , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  N. helm-estabrooks Cognition and aphasia: a discussion and a study. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[36]  R. Berndt,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Aphasic Sentence Production: Further Development and New Data , 2000, Brain and Language.

[37]  R. R. Robey A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[38]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data , 1989, Brain and Language.

[39]  Philip H. Price Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. , 1979 .

[40]  A. C. V. Cardoso,et al.  Effect of delayed auditory feedback on clutter ’ s speech and reading , 2017 .

[41]  P. Kuhl Is speech learning 'gated' by the social brain? , 2007, Developmental science.

[42]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.