No causal link between changes in hand position sense and feeling of limb ownership in the rubber hand illusion

The rubber hand illusion is a perceptual illusion in which participants experience an inanimate rubber hand as belonging to their own body. The illusion is elicited by synchronously stroking the rubber hand and the participant’s real hand, which is hidden from sight. The feeling of owning the rubber hand is accompanied by changes in hand position sense (proprioception), so that when participants are asked to indicate the location of their (unseen) hand, they indicate that it is located closer to the rubber hand. This “proprioceptive drift” is the most widely used objective measure of the rubber hand illusion, and from a theoretical perspective, it suggests a close link between proprioception and the feeling of body ownership. However, the critical question of whether a causal relationship exists between changes in hand position sense and changes in limb ownership is unknown. Here we addressed this question by devising a novel setup that allowed us to mechanically manipulate the position of the participant’s hand without the participant noticing, while the rubber hand illusion was being elicited. Our results showed that changing the sensed position closer to or farther away from the rubber hand did not change the strength of the rubber hand illusion. Thus, the illusion is not dependent on changes in hand position sense. This finding supports models of body ownership and central body representation that hold that proprioceptive drift and the subjective illusion are related to different central processes.

[1]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Behavioural Brain Research , 1999 .

[3]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[4]  Massimiliano Di Luca,et al.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: Feeling of Ownership and Proprioceptive Drift Do Not Go Hand in Hand , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  F. Vignemont.  Embodiment, ownership and disownership , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Jürgen Konczak,et al.  Measuring kinaesthetic sensitivity in typically developing children , 2009, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[7]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[8]  Albert Jin Chung,et al.  Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews , 2022 .

[10]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  When Right Feels Left: Referral of Touch and Ownership between the Hands , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  Henning Holle,et al.  Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the “rubber hand illusion” paradigm , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  Charles Spence,et al.  When mirrors lie: “Visual capture” of arm position impairs reaching performance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  O. Blanke.  Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Catherine Preston,et al.  The role of distance from the body and distance from the real hand in ownership and disownership during the rubber hand illusion. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[17]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[18]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  That's Near My Hand! Parietal and Premotor Coding of Hand-Centered Space Contributes to Localization and Self-Attribution of the Hand , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Giovanni Gentile,et al.  The Invisible Hand Illusion: Multisensory Integration Leads to the Embodiment of a Discrete Volume of Empty Space , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Regine Zopf,et al.  Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  C. Spence,et al.  Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Tsakiris.  My body in the brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  H. Chris Dijkerman,et al.  Affective touch modulates the rubber hand illusion , 2014, Cognition.

[24]  Richard P. DeShon,et al.  Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[25]  J. Hohwy,et al.  Explaining Away the Body: Experiences of Supernaturally Caused Touch and Touch on Non-Hand Objects within the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  J. Hohwy,et al.  The Rubber Hand Illusion Reveals Proprioceptive and Sensorimotor Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2012, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[27]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Marieke Rohde,et al.  The Human Touch: Skin Temperature during the Rubber Hand Illusion in Manual and Automated Stroking Procedures , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  D. Lloyd.  Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Charles Spence,et al.  Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[35]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[36]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  The Illusion of Owning a Third Arm , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.