Effects of Pattern Orientation and Number of Symmetry Axes on the Detection of Mirror Symmetry in Dot and Solid Patterns

It has been postulated that as the number of axes of symmetry in a pattern increases, so pattern ‘goodness’ increases. Recently, a distinction was made between two different theoretical accounts of regularity or ‘goodness’ in relation to patterns with mirror symmetry: the ‘transformational’ and the ‘holographic’ models. It was argued that the former predicts a ‘goodness’ ordering of four > three > two > one whereas the latter predicts four > two > three > one, where ‘>’ means greater regularity or goodness. In three experiments, we have tested these predictions. In experiment 1, we measured percentage correct and reaction time to dot patterns which had one, two, three, or four axes of symmetry and were flashed for 150 ms. Experiment 2 was identical except that patterns were presented for 2000 ms. In experiment 3, dot patterns were replaced by solid shapes which also had one, two, three, or four axes of symmetry. Although it was found that stimuli with four axes clearly allowed superior performance to that of stimuli with one axis, results obtained with stimuli with two and three axes were almost identical and in between those obtained with one and four axes. The data thus support the suggestion that extra axes add ‘goodness’ to symmetrical patterns but not in a monotonic fashion.

[1]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Identification of symmetry: Effects of stimulus orientation and head position , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Orientational Effects and Component Processes in Symmetry Detection , 1992 .

[3]  G K Humphrey,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry Detection: Testing a ‘Callosal’ Hypothesis , 1996, Perception.

[4]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Detection of symmetry in tachistoscopically presented dot patterns: Effects of multiple axes and skewing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[6]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[7]  H Pashler,et al.  Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  S. Palmer.  The Psychology of Perceptual Organization: A Transformational Approach , 1983 .

[9]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Effects of Dot Pattern Parameters and Constraints on the Relative Salience of Vertical Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  P J Locher,et al.  Effects of Element Type and Spatial Grouping on Symmetry Detection , 1993, Perception.

[11]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Salience of Vertical Symmetry , 1994, Perception.

[12]  J. Hamada,et al.  Complexity and goodness of dot patterns varying in symmetry , 1988, Psychological research.

[13]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[14]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Detection of visual symmetries. , 1995, Spatial vision.

[15]  P Wenderoth,et al.  The Effects on Bilateral-Symmetry Detection of Multiple Symmetry, near Symmetry, and Axis Orientation , 1997, Perception.

[16]  Peter Wenderoth.  The Effects of the Contrast Polarity of Dot-Pair Partners on the Detection of Bilateral Symmetry , 1996, Perception.

[17]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.

[18]  F. Royer,et al.  Detection of symmetry. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  M. Corballis,et al.  Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.