E-MAIL: DOES IT NEED TO BE MANAGED? CAN IT BE MANAGED?

Although e-mail is the most commonly used application, very little has been written concerning its impact on public organizations. This article reviews the existing literature and outlines the major aspects of e-mail that need the attention of public managers. Much of the existing literature has taken place in laboratories and focused on issues such as “flaming” and deindividuation and is not useful for learning how to manage e-mail in everyday organizations. For example, there is very little evidence of flaming in organizationa l e -mail. Another major body of literature has explored the hypotheses of media richness theory (MRT) which views e-mail as a “lean” medium compared with richer “face-to-face” (FTF) communication. However, if people know one another well, they may be able to read very much into e-mail and thus make it a richer medium. MRT hypothesizes that managers will be more effective if they use the appropriate medium for the action they want to take. But evidence from the few studies that exist indicates that managers are now using e-mail for even the most sensitive of communications. The distinguishing characteristic of e -mail is that it creates a detailed digital record unlike everyday FTF and phone communication. The existence of an unprotected digital record has legal implications that are explored in the paper. The paper also discusses how employees are now using e-mail strategically in order to document actions and, sometimes, point the finger at other employees whom they feel have not performed well. Some tentative suggestions for managers are outlined for each of these issues.

[1]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government , 1989 .

[2]  Charles Prysby,et al.  Legal aspects of electronic mail in public organizations , 1999 .

[3]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[4]  Sue Barnes,et al.  Computer‐mediated communication in the organization , 1994 .

[5]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[6]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry , 1988, TOIS.

[7]  Tora K. Bikson,et al.  Sending Your Government a Message: E-Mail Communications between Citizens and Government , 2000 .

[8]  Michael R. Overly E-Policy: How to Develop Computer, E-mail, and Internet Guidelines to Protect Your Company and Its Assets , 1998 .

[9]  Maeda J. Galinsky,et al.  Technology-Based Groups: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Practice , 1998 .

[10]  William J. Bruns,et al.  The information mosaic , 1992 .

[11]  G. David Garson,et al.  Information technology and computer applications in public administration: issues and trends , 1999 .

[12]  Eric M. Eisenberg,et al.  Strategic Uses of Electronic Mail in Organisations , 1996 .

[13]  Burke T. Ward,et al.  Ethical Management of Employee E-Mail Privacy , 1998, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[14]  David A. Owens,et al.  Technologies of status management status dynamics in e-mail communications , 2000 .

[15]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Who Needs the Internet? Computer-Mediated Communication in Design Firms , 1996 .

[16]  Terri R. Kurtzberg,et al.  Long and Short Routes to Success in Electronically Mediated Negotiations: Group Affiliations and Good Vibrations. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[17]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Straight Talk: Delivering Bad News through Electronic Communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and media preference: An investigation of the dimensionality of perceived task equivocality and media richness , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  The Use of Computer‐mediated Communication in an Interorganizational Context , 1997 .

[20]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work , 1994, TOIS.

[21]  Ellen Kanervo,et al.  Perceptions and Uses of Electronic Mail , 1997 .

[22]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Media and Task on User Performance: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis , 2000 .

[23]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature , 1995 .

[24]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratification Niches of Personal E-mail and the Telephone , 2000, Commun. Res..

[25]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[26]  A. Fendrick,et al.  "We got mail": electronic communication between physicians and patients. , 1999, The American journal of managed care.

[27]  James R. Van Scotter,et al.  Examining E-mail Use in the Context of Virtual Organizations: Implications for Theory and Practice , 1998, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[28]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination and Virtualization: The Role of Electronic Networks and Personal Relationships , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  I. A. Rudy,et al.  A critical review of research on electronic mail , 1996 .

[30]  David A. Owens,et al.  Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , 2001 .

[31]  L. Flanagan,et al.  A question of ethics. , 1986, Nursing times.

[32]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Lotus Notes and Collaboration: Plus ça change , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Elliot Maltz,et al.  Is all communication created equal?: an investigation into the effects of communication mode on perceived information quality , 2000 .

[34]  Reza Barkhi,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Face to Face versus Computer Mediated Communication Channels , 1999 .

[35]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[37]  D. Levine,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication as Employee Voice: A Case Study , 1999 .

[38]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[39]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Heavy Users of Electronic Mail , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[41]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  The Impact of Revitalized Management Practices on the Adoption of Information Technology: A National Survey of Local Governments , 2001 .

[42]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..