Patterns of Adherence to and Compliance with the Portuguese Smoke-Free Law in the Leisure-Hospitality Sector

Background In 2008, the Portuguese smoke-free law came into effect including partial bans in the leisure-hospitality (LH) sector. The objective of the study is to assess the prevalence of smoking control policies (total ban, smoking permission and designated smoking areas) adopted by the LH sector in Portugal. The levels of noncompliance with each policy are investigated as well as the main factors associated with smoking permission and noncompliance with the law. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted between January 2010 and May 2011. A random sample of venues was selected from the Portuguese LH sector database, proportionally stratified according to type, size and geographical area. All venues were assessed in loco by an observer. The independent effects of venues' characteristics on smoking permission and the level of noncompliance with the law were explored using logistic regression. Results Overall, 1.412 venues were included. Total ban policy was adopted by 75.9% of venues, while 8.4% had designated smoking areas. Smoking ban was more prevalent in restaurants (85.9%). Only 29.7% of discos/bars/pubs opted for complete ban. Full or partial smoking permission was higher in discos/bar/pubs (OR = 7.37; 95%CI 4.87 to 11.17). Noncompliance with the law was higher in venues allowing smoking and lower in places with complete ban (33.6% and 7.6% respectively, p<0.001). Discos/bars/pubs with full smoking permission had the highest level of noncompliance (OR = 3.31; 95%CI 1.40 to 7.83). Conclusions Our findings show a high adherence to smoking ban policy by the Portuguese LH sector. Nonetheless, one quarter of the venues is fully or partially permissive towards smoking, with the discos/bars/pubs considerably contributing to this situation. Venues with smoking permission policies were less compliant with the legislation. The implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law, without any exceptions, is essential to effectively protect people from the second hand smoke.

[1]  E. Fernández,et al.  Impact of the Spanish Smoke-Free Legislation on Adult, Non-Smoker Exposure to Secondhand Smoke: Cross-Sectional Surveys before (2004) and after (2012) Legislation , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  E. Fernández,et al.  Impact of the 2011 Spanish smoking ban in hospitality venues: indoor secondhand smoke exposure and influence of outdoor smoking. , 2013, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[3]  K. Ravindra,et al.  Effective smoke-free policies in achieving a high level of compliance with smoke-free law: experiences from a district of North India , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[4]  A. Hyland,et al.  Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[5]  Hermann Brenner,et al.  Comprehensive smoke-free policies attract more support from smokers in Europe than partial policies. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[6]  J. Samet,et al.  Secondhand tobacco smoke: an occupational hazard for smoking and non-smoking bar and nightclub employees , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[7]  E. Fernández,et al.  The so-called "Spanish model" - Tobacco industry strategies and its impact in Europe and Latin America , 2011, BMC public health.

[8]  S. Ravara,et al.  Smoking behaviour predicts tobacco control attitudes in a high smoking prevalence hospital: A cross-sectional study in a Portuguese teaching hospital prior to the national smoking ban , 2011, BMC public health.

[9]  Manel Nebot,et al.  Two-year impact of the Spanish smoking law on exposure to secondhand smoke: evidence of the failure of the ‘Spanish model’ , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[10]  J. Precioso,et al.  Qualidade do ar interior em estabelecimentos da restauração após a entrada em vigor da lei portuguesa de controlo do tabagismo , 2011 .

[11]  Patrick N Breysse,et al.  Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[12]  J. Borrás,et al.  [Changes in hospitality workers' expectations and attitudes after the implementation of the Spanish smoking law]. , 2010, Gaceta sanitaria.

[13]  J. Precioso,et al.  First exploratory descriptive study on adherence to and compliance with the Portuguese smoke-free law in the leisure-hospitality sector , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[14]  M. Nebot,et al.  Cambios en las expectativas y las actitudes de los trabajadores de la hosteleria despues de la ley de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo , 2010 .

[15]  J. Calheiros,et al.  Avaliação do cumprimento da lei portuguesa de prevenção do tabagismo no sector da estauração , 2009 .

[16]  Geoffrey T Fong,et al.  Attitudes and beliefs about secondhand smoke and smoke-free policies in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[17]  E. Fernández,et al.  Impact of the Spanish Smoking Law on Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke and Respiratory Health in Hospitality Workers: A Cohort Study , 2009, PloS one.

[18]  E. Fernández,et al.  Impact of the Spanish Smoking Law on Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in Offices and Hospitality Venues: Before-and-After Study , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  Organización Mundial de la Salud.  WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments , 2009 .

[20]  L. Díez-Gañán,et al.  Impact of the "Tobacco control law" on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in Spain , 2007, BMC public health.

[21]  T. Lam,et al.  Protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke : policy recommendations , 2007 .

[22]  N. Wilson,et al.  One year of smokefree bars and restaurants in New Zealand: Impacts and responses , 2006, BMC public health.

[23]  J. Viña.  La aplicación en las empresas de la Ley 28/2005, de 26 de diciembre, de medidas sanitarias frente al tabaquismo y reguladora dela venta,el suministro, el consumo y la publicidad de los productos del tabaco , 2006 .

[24]  James L. Repace,et al.  Secondhand smoke exposure and risk following the Irish smoking ban: an assessment of salivary cotinine concentrations in hotel workers and air nicotine levels in bars , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[25]  G. Leung,et al.  Secondhand smoke and respiratory ill health in current smokers , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[26]  M Neuberger,et al.  Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in public places of European cities , 2005, Tobacco Control.

[27]  D. Cowling,et al.  Changes of knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and preference of bar owner and staff in response to a smoke-free bar law , 2004, Tobacco Control.

[28]  R. Poulos,et al.  Designated “no smoking” areas provide from partial to no protection from environmental tobacco smoke , 2004, Tobacco Control.

[29]  Kotzias Dimitrios,et al.  Impact of Various Air Exchange Rates on the Levels of Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Components , 2004 .

[30]  S. Glantz,et al.  Even a little secondhand smoke is dangerous. , 2001, JAMA.