Evaluation of Light Pollution in Global Protected Areas from 1992 to 2018

Light pollution, a phenomenon in which artificial nighttime light (NTL) changes the form of brightness and darkness in natural areas such as protected areas (PAs), has become a global concern due to its threat to global biodiversity. With ongoing global urbanization and climate change, the light pollution status in global PAs deserves attention for mitigation and adaptation. In this study, we developed a framework to evaluate the light pollution status in global PAs, using the global NTL time series data. First, we classified global PAs (30,624) into three pollution categories: non-polluted (5974), continuously polluted (8141), and discontinuously polluted (16,509), according to the time of occurrence of lit pixels in/around PAs from 1992 to 2018. Then, we explored the NTL intensity (e.g., digital numbers) and its trend in those polluted PAs and identified those hotspots of PAs at the global scale with consideration of global urbanization. Our study shows that global light pollution is mainly distributed within the range of 30°N and 60°N, including Europe, north America, and East Asia. Although the temporal trend of NTL intensity in global PAs is increasing, Japan and the United States of America (USA) have opposite trends due to the implementation of well-planned ecological conservation policies and declining population growth. For most polluted PAs, the lit pixels are close to their boundaries (i.e., less than 10 km), and the NTL in/around these lit areas has become stronger over the past decades. The identified hotspots of PAs (e.g., Europe, the USA, and East Asia) help support decisions on global biodiversity conservation, particularly with global urbanization and climate change.

[1]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  N. Kingston,et al.  Sixty years of tracking conservation progress using the World Database on Protected Areas , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[3]  Wenli Xiang,et al.  Changes in Light Pollution and the Causing Factors in China's Protected Areas, 1992-2012 , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[4]  C. Voigt,et al.  Artificial light puts ecosystem services of frugivorous bats at risk , 2014 .

[5]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  The influence of artificial light at night and polarized light on bird-building collisions , 2020 .

[6]  Marc Robin,et al.  Worldwide increase in Artificial Light At Night around protected areas and within biodiversity hotspots , 2018, Biological Conservation.

[7]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  Mapping annual urban dynamics (1985–2015) using time series of Landsat data , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[8]  K. Baugh,et al.  Light pollution in USA and Europe: The good, the bad and the ugly. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Susan G. Laurance,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and the desiccation of forest canopies: A case study from eastern Amazonia , 2010 .

[10]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Global Trends in Exposure to Light Pollution in Natural Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Le Yu,et al.  Mapping global urban boundaries from the global artificial impervious area (GAIA) data , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  Annual maps of global artificial impervious area (GAIA) between 1985 and 2018 , 2020 .

[13]  J. Watson,et al.  Protected area targets post-2020 , 2019, Science.

[14]  Elizabeth K. Perkin,et al.  Light pollution is a driver of insect declines , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[15]  Xiaoyi Guo,et al.  Assessment of Night-Time Lighting for Global Terrestrial Protected and Wilderness Areas , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[16]  A. Merenlender,et al.  Reply to You et al.: The World Database on Protected Areas is an invaluable resource for global conservation assessments and planning , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Lyytimäki Nature's nocturnal services: Light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management , 2013 .

[18]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[19]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  A global record of annual urban dynamics (1992–2013) from nighttime lights , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[20]  Jun Chen,et al.  Functional Requirements of Systems for Visualization of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Indicators , 2020, Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis.

[21]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  T. Smyth,et al.  Why artificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century , 2018, Global change biology.

[23]  K. Gaston,et al.  Stemming the Tide of Light Pollution Encroaching into Marine Protected Areas , 2016 .

[24]  D. Tilman,et al.  Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[25]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The nature, extent, and ecological implications of marine light pollution , 2014 .

[26]  P. Failler,et al.  Is Aichi Target 11 Progress Correctly Measured for Developing Countries? , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality , 2018, Science.

[28]  E. Knop,et al.  Artificial light at night can modify ecosystem functioning beyond the lit area , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  Polarized light pollution: a new kind of ecological photopollution , 2009 .

[30]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  A harmonized global nighttime light dataset 1992–2018 , 2020, Scientific Data.

[31]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  A national dataset of 30-m annual urban extent dynamics (1985–2015) in the conterminous United States , 2019 .

[32]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination , 2017, Nature.

[33]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Colour remote sensing of the impact of artificial light at night (I): The potential of the International Space Station and other DSLR-based platforms , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[34]  R. Fernandes,et al.  Parametric (modified least squares) and non-parametric (Theil–Sen) linear regressions for predicting biophysical parameters in the presence of measurement errors , 2005 .

[35]  C. Kyba Is light pollution getting better or worse? , 2018 .

[36]  M. Kocifaj,et al.  Evaluating Potential Spectral Impacts of Various Artificial Lights on Melatonin Suppression, Photosynthesis, and Star Visibility , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Zhiheng Wang,et al.  Vulnerabilities of protected lands in the face of climate and human footprint changes , 2021, Nature Communications.

[38]  Kendall R. Jones,et al.  Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[39]  M. Visser,et al.  Restless roosts: Light pollution affects behavior, sleep, and physiology in a free‐living songbird , 2017, Global change biology.

[40]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants , 2016 .

[41]  P. Gong,et al.  A 30-year (1984–2013) record of annual urban dynamics of Beijing City derived from Landsat data , 2015 .

[42]  Marc Hockings,et al.  An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas , 2018 .

[43]  Li An,et al.  Transforming Protected Area Management in China. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Chen Shi,et al.  Modeling the Census Tract Level Housing Vacancy Rate with the Jilin1-03 Satellite and Other Geospatial Data , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Jonathan Bennie,et al.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[46]  Karolina M. Zielinska-Dabkowska,et al.  Assessment of Citizens’ Actions against Light Pollution with Guidelines for Future Initiatives , 2020, Sustainability.

[47]  M. Jha,et al.  Seasonal and annual precipitation time series trend analysis in North Carolina, United States , 2014 .

[48]  N. Harris,et al.  Dynamics in the global protected‐area estate since 2004 , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  Lihua Yuan,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of vegetation variation in the Yellow River Basin , 2015 .

[50]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  Anthropogenic Light Disrupts Natural Light Cycles in Critical Conservation Areas , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[51]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  A Stepwise Calibration of Global DMSP/OLS Stable Nighttime Light Data (1992-2013) , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[52]  S. Lewis,et al.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[53]  J. Barentine,et al.  The proliferation of space objects is a rapidly increasing source of artificial night sky brightness , 2021, 2103.17125.

[54]  Jaclyn A. Smolinsky,et al.  Artificial light at night confounds broad-scale habitat use by migrating birds. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[55]  M. Salmon,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES ON AN URBAN BEACH. II: HATCHLING ORIENTATION , 1995 .

[56]  Wei Zhang,et al.  40-Year (1978-2017) human settlement changes in China reflected by impervious surfaces from satellite remote sensing. , 2019, Science bulletin.

[57]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Setting priorities to avoid deforestation in Amazon protected areas: are we choosing the right indicators? , 2013 .

[58]  Yuyu Zhou,et al.  Urban mapping using DMSP/OLS stable night-time light: a review , 2017, Remote Sensing of Night-time Light.

[59]  Chenghu Zhou,et al.  Applications of Satellite Remote Sensing of Nighttime Light Observations: Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[60]  Raul C. Lima,et al.  Monitoring transition: Expected night sky brightness trends in different photometric bands , 2019, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer.

[61]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Remote sensing of night lights: A review and an outlook for the future , 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[62]  K. Gaston,et al.  Quantifying the erosion of natural darkness in the global protected area system , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[63]  C. Lemarchand,et al.  Accounting for artificial light impact on bat activity for a biodiversity-friendly urban planning , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[64]  Eleanor C. Stokes,et al.  NASA's Black Marble nighttime lights product suite , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[65]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  REVIEW: Reducing the ecological consequences of night‐time light pollution: options and developments , 2012, The Journal of applied ecology.

[66]  Xia Li,et al.  High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015 , 2020, Nature Sustainability.