Electrification of the economy and CO2 emissions mitigation

In this article, the ratio of central station electricity to final energy is used as a measure of electrification. It is well known that this ratio tends to increase with gross domestic product. We show that not only is electrification a characteristic of a reference case with economic growth, but that it is significantly accelerated by a general limitation on carbon emissions. That is, limits on CO2 concentrations, implemented efficiently across the whole economy, result in a higher ratio of electricity to total final energy use. This result reflects the relatively greater suite of options available in reducing CO2 emissions in power generation than in other important components of the economy. Furthermore, electrification is stronger, the more stringent the constraint on CO2 emissions, although the absolute production of electricity may be either greater or smaller in the presence of a CO2 constraint, depending on the technologies available to the sector and to end-use sectors. The base technology scenario we examined was purposefully pessimistic about the evolution of central station and distributed electric technologies, lessening the degree of electrification. The better the performance of the set of options for emissions mitigation in power generation, the greater the acceleration of electrification.

[1]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Global Energy: Assessing the Future , 1985 .

[2]  Sarah C. B. Raper,et al.  An integrated framework to address climate change (ESCAPE) and further developments of the global and regional climate modules (MAGICC) , 1995 .

[3]  Shunsuke Mori,et al.  An integrated assessment model for the new energy technologies and food production - an extension of the MARIA model , 1998 .

[4]  M. Strubegger,et al.  User's Guide for MESSAGE III , 1995 .

[5]  S. Alam,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1993 .

[6]  Unfccc Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[7]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Stabilization of CO2 in a B2 world: insights on the roles of carbon capture and disposal, hydrogen, and transportation technologies , 2004 .

[8]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[9]  The Berlin Mandate: The Design of Cost-Effective Mitigation Strategies , 1999 .

[10]  Koji Tokimatsu,et al.  Analysis of Carbon Emission Stabilization Targets and Adaptation by Integrated Assessment Model , 1999 .

[11]  R. Leemans,et al.  Global change scenarios of the 21st Century : results from the IMAGE 2.1 model , 1998 .

[12]  K. Riahi,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Dynamics-as-Usual Scenario of Economic and Energy Development , 2000 .

[13]  K. Yamaji,et al.  Assessment of technological options in the global energy system for limiting the atmospheric CO2 concentration , 1998 .

[14]  Donald J. Wuebbles,et al.  Radiative forcing of climate , 1991 .

[15]  J. Houghton Climate change 1994 : radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios , 1995 .

[16]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[17]  Shunsuke Mori,et al.  The Development of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scenarios Using an Extension of the MARIA Model for the Assessment of Resource and Energy Technologies , 2000 .

[18]  Bert de Vries,et al.  GLOBAL CHANGE SCENARIOS OF THE 21st CENTURY , 2007 .

[19]  Mikiko Kainuma,et al.  Analysis of Post-Kyoto Scenarios: The Asian-Pacific Integrated Model , 1999 .

[20]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.