Spatial and temporal variability in the lower food web of the tidal freshwater Hudson River

The mid Hudson River is a heterotrophic system where allochthonous inputs apparently fuel the largest proportion of secondary production and ecosystem metabolism. We have analyzed a 6-yr dataset collected quarterly at six stations spanning a 150-km reach to assess variability at inter- and intra-annual time scales and regional spatial scales. The major components of the lower food web: bacterial biomass, detrital particulate organic carbon (POC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC), show surprisingly discordant patterns in temporal and spatial variability. Bacterial abundance shows significant variability at all three scales, but the interannual variability is by far the greatest. DOC concentrations showed greatest variability among years, with intra-annual and spatial variability roughly equal. Freshwater flow is commonly considered a major driving force in river-estuarine variability but simple discharge was not a strong predictor of any component of suspended matter or DOC. For organisms in the Hudson River food web, these multiple scales of variability indicate highly unpredictable food resources in time and space, and these fluctuations may contribute to the variability in higher trophic levels.

[1]  H. Ducklow,et al.  Temperature and substrate regulation of bacterial abundance, production and specific growth rate in Chesapeake Bay, USA , 1994 .

[2]  K. Lajtha,et al.  Couplings of watersheds and coastal waters: Sources and consequences of nutrient enrichment in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts , 1992 .

[3]  B. L. Peierls,et al.  Can phytoplankton maintaina positive carbon balance in a turbid, freshwater, tidal estuary? , 1992 .

[4]  M. Pace,et al.  Fate of bacterial production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: grazing by protists and metazoans in the Hudson Estuary , 1992 .

[5]  P. Lehman.  Environmental factors associated with long-term changes in chlorophyll concentration in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta and Suisun Bay, California , 1992 .

[6]  M. Pace,et al.  Variability and transport of suspended sediment, particulate and dissolved organic carbon in the tidal freshwater Hudson River , 1991 .

[7]  M. Pace,et al.  Weak coupling of bacterial and algal production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: The Hudson River estuary , 1991 .

[8]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[9]  S. Wainright.  Stimulation of Heterotrophic Microplankton Production by Resuspended Marine Sediments , 1987, Science.

[10]  J. Sharp,et al.  Microbial trophodynamics in the Delaware Estuary , 1987 .

[11]  D. Wolfe,et al.  ESTUARINE VARIABILITY: AN OVERVIEW , 1986 .

[12]  R. T. Wright,et al.  Planktonic bacteria in estuaries and coastal waters of northern Massachusetts: spatial and temporal distribution , 1983 .

[13]  M. Meybeck.  Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transport by world rivers , 1982 .

[14]  A. Palumbo,et al.  Distribution of suspended bacteria in the Newport River estuary, North Carolina , 1978 .

[15]  M. Roman.  Tidal resuspension in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts: II. Seasonal changes in the size distribution of chlorophyll, particle concentration, carbon and nitrogen in resuspended particulate matter , 1978 .

[16]  G. Deacon.  Biological oceanographic processes—2nd edition: By T. R. Parsons, M. Takahashi and B. Hargrave. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977. 344 pages. £10.95, US$21.90 (hard), £7.95, US$15.90 (flexi) , 1977 .

[17]  G. Likens,et al.  Carbon in the biota. , 1973, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[18]  Timothy R. Parsons,et al.  Biological Oceanographic Processes , 1973 .