ZipWeave: Towards efficient and reliable measurement based mobile coverage maps

The accuracy of measurement-driven mobile coverage maps depends on the quality, density and pattern of the signal strength observations. Thus, identifying an efficient measurement data collection methodology is essential, especially when considering the cost associated with the measurement collection approaches (e.g., drive tests, crowd approaches). We propose ZipWeave, a novel measurement data collection and fusion framework for building efficient and reliable measurement-based mobile coverage maps. ZipWeave incorporates a novel nonuniform sampling strategy to achieve reliable coverage maps with reduced sample size. Assuming prior knowledge of the propagation characteristics of the region of interest, we first examine the potential gains of this non-uniform sampling strategy in different cases via a measurement-based statistical analysis methodology; this involves irregular spatial tessellation of the region of interest into sub-regions with internally similar radio propagation characteristics and sampling based on these sub-regions. We then present a practical form of ZipWeave nonuniform sampling strategy that can be used even without any prior information. In all our evaluations, we show that the ZipWeave non-uniform sampling approach reduces the samples by half compared to the common systematic-random sampling, while maintaining similar accuracy. Moreover, we show that the other key feature of ZipWeave to combine high-quality controlled measurements (that present limited geographic footprint similar to drive tests) with crowdsourced measurements (that cover a wider footprint) leads to more reliable mobile coverage maps overall.

[1]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[2]  J. Yamamoto An Alternative Measure of the Reliability of Ordinary Kriging Estimates , 2000 .

[3]  A. Oiea Sampling Design Optimization for Spatial Functions , 2004 .

[4]  G. Heuvelink,et al.  Optimization of sample patterns for universal kriging of environmental variables , 2007 .

[5]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Second-Phase Sampling Designs for Non-Stationary Spatial Variables. , 2009, Geoderma.

[6]  Samira Kolyaie,et al.  ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION OF WIRELESS SIGNAL PROPAGATION APPLYING GEOSTATISTICAL INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES , 2011 .

[7]  Berna Sayraç,et al.  Best Sensor Selection for an Iterative REM Construction , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[8]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  Practical radio environment mapping with geostatistics , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[9]  Johan Johansson,et al.  Minimization of drive tests in 3GPP release 11 , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Sana Ben Jemaa,et al.  Bayesian spatial interpolation as an emerging cognitive radio application for coverage analysis in cellular networks , 2013, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[11]  Konstantin Krivoruchko Unequal Probability-Based Spatial Sampling , 2013 .

[12]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Ahmed Elmokashfi,et al.  The Nornet Edge platform for mobile broadband measurements , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[14]  M. Marina,et al.  Impact of Indoor-Outdoor Context on Crowdsourcing based Mobile Coverage Analysis , 2015, AllThingsCellular@SIGCOMM.

[15]  Massimiliano Molinari,et al.  Spatial Interpolation based Cellular Coverage Prediction with Crowdsourced Measurements , 2015, C2BD@SIGCOMM.