Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans.

It has been hypothesized that evolutionary changes will be more frequent in later ontogeny than early ontogeny because of developmental constraint. To test this hypothesis, a genomewide examination of molecular evolution through ontogeny was carried out using comparative genomic data in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae. We found that the mean rate of amino acid replacement is not significantly different between genes expressed during and after embryogenesis. However, synonymous substitution rates differed significantly between these two classes. A genomewide survey of correlation between codon bias and expression level found codon bias to be significantly correlated with mRNA expression (r(s) = -0.30 and P < 10(-131)) but does not alone explain differences in dS between classes. Surprisingly, it was found that genes expressed after embryogenesis have a significantly greater number of duplicates in both the C. elegans and C. briggsae genomes (P < 10(-20) and P < 10(-13)) when compared with early-expressed and nonmodulated genes. A similarity in the distribution of duplicates of nonmodulated and early-expressed genes, as well as a disproportionately higher number of early pseudogenes, lend support to the hypothesis that this difference in duplicate number is caused by selection against gene duplicates of early-expressed genes, reflecting developmental constraint. Developmental constraint at the level of gene duplication may have important implications for macroevolutionary change.

[1]  R. Riedl Order in living organisms , 1978 .

[2]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  W. Arthur A theory of the evolution of development , 1988 .

[4]  F. Wright The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. , 1990, Gene.

[5]  H. Atkinson The structure of nematodes (2nd edn) , 1992 .

[6]  B C Goodwin,et al.  Is morphogenesis an intrinsically robust process? , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  S. Gould The Shape of Life , 1996 .

[9]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  William T. Arthur,et al.  The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology , 1997 .

[11]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.

[12]  N. M. Brooke,et al.  A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution , 1998, Nature.

[13]  A. Civetta,et al.  Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  A. Force,et al.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[15]  L. Duret,et al.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. Stern,et al.  Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  L. Duret,et al.  Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Relationship of codon bias to mRNA concentration and protein length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Yeast.

[19]  W. Arthur The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms , 2000, Evolution & development.

[20]  E. Brown,et al.  Genomic analysis of gene expression in C. elegans. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Optimal spliced alignment of homologous cDNA to a genomic DNA template , 2000, Bioinform..

[22]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[23]  Gerald J. Wyckoff,et al.  Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  WormBase: network access to the genome and biology of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Z. Yang,et al.  Substitution rates in Drosophila nuclear genes: implications for translational selection. , 2001, Genetics.

[26]  D. Hartl,et al.  Molecular evolution of the ocnus and janus genes in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood (PAML) , 2002 .