Recording and analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) with MED-EL cochlear implants and different artifact reduction strategies in Matlab

Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) are used in auditory research to evaluate the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation. Animal preparations are typically used for the recording. With the introduction of a new generation of cochlear implants, however it is possible to record the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation in humans as well, which is used in the clinic to test whether the implant works properly and whether the auditory nerve is responsive. Currently, ECAPs are used to estimate thresholds for speech processor programs. In addition, ECAPs recordings allow new research to be addressed, e.g., to evaluate enhanced electrical stimulation patterns. Research platforms are required to test user-defined stimuli and algorithms for the ECAPs analysis. Clinical fitting software that records ECAPs is not flexible enough for this purpose. To enable a larger group of scientists to pursue research in this field, we introduce a flexible setup that allows to change stimulation and recording parameters. ECAP recording and analysis software was developed in Matlab (The Mathworks, Inc.) for standard PC, using a National instruments (PCI-6533, National Instruments, Austin, TX) card and a Research Interface Box 2 (RIB2, Department of Ion Physics and Applied Physics at the University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria) for MED-EL cochlear implants. ECAP recordings of a human subject with three different artifact reduction methods (alternating, Miller modified masker-probe, triphasic pulses) are presented and compared.

[1]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  A new method for dealing with the stimulus artefact in electrically evoked compound action potential measurements , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  S J Norton,et al.  Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation’s CI24M Device , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Uwe Baumann,et al.  Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR) with an integrated stimulus generator in Matlab , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  C. Zierhofer.  Adaptive sigma-delta modulation with one-bit quantization , 2000 .

[5]  Uwe Baumann,et al.  Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses after electrical stimulation with biphasic, triphasic and precision triphasic pulses , 2010, Hearing Research.

[6]  P J Abbas,et al.  Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system , 2008, Hearing Research.

[8]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  An Improved Method of Reducing Stimulus Artifact in the Electrically Evoked Whole‐Nerve Potential , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[9]  J M Aran,et al.  Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation , 1998, Hearing Research.

[11]  Cristina Roldan,et al.  Generalized alternating stimulation: A novel method to reduce stimulus artifact in electrically evoked compound action potentials , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  P J Abbas,et al.  The Relationship Between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[13]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Response Properties of the Refractory Auditory Nerve Fiber , 2001, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Relation Between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Ear and hearing.