Quasi steady state and dynamic hygrothermal performance of fibrous Hemp and Stone Wool insulations: Two innovative laboratory based investigations

Moisture and heat management properties of Hemp and Stone Wool insulations were studied by mounting them between a hot and a cold climate chamber. Both insulations were exposed to identical hygrothermal boundary conditions. Quasi steady state and dynamic tests were carried out at a range of relative humidity exposures. The likelihood of interstitial condensation was assessed and equivalent thermal conductivity values of the insulations were determined. The adsorption–desorption isotherms of the insulations were also determined in a dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) instrument. It was observed that the likelihood of condensation was higher in Stone Wool insulation than in Hemp insulation. Hemp insulation performed better in managing moisture due to its high hygric inertia and water absorption capacity. It was observed that the equivalent thermal conductivity of Stone Wool insulation was dependent on enthalpy flow and phase change of moisture. The equivalent thermal conductivity of Hemp insulation was close to its declared thermal conductivity in dynamic conditions when high relative humidity exposures were transient. In quasi steady state boundary conditions, when the insulation was allowed to reach the equilibrium moisture content at ranges of relative humidity, there was a moisture dependent increase of thermal conductivity in Hemp insulation.

[1]  Alena Vimmrová,et al.  Long-term on-site assessment of hygrothermal performance of interior thermal insulation system without water vapour barrier , 2009 .

[2]  K. Gudmundsson,et al.  Comparison of fibrous insulations : cellulose and stone wool in terms of moisture properties resulting from condensation and ice formation , 2010 .

[3]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  The comparative in situ hygrothermal performance of Hemp and Stone Wool insulations in vapour open timber frame wall panels , 2014 .

[4]  Dominique Derome,et al.  Inward vapor diffusion due to high temperature gradients in experimentally tested large-scale wall assemblies , 2010 .

[5]  Darryl J. Newport,et al.  Hygric properties of hemp bio-insulations with differing compositions , 2014 .

[6]  J. Southern.  Summer condensation within dry lined solid walls , 1986 .

[7]  Robert Černý,et al.  Hygrothermal performance study of an innovative interior thermal insulation system , 2009 .

[8]  S. Pavía,et al.  Thermal performance of a selection of insulation materials suitable for historic buildings , 2015 .

[9]  Torben Valdbjørn Rasmussen,et al.  Assessment of the performance of organic and mineral-based insulation products used in exterior walls and attics in dwellings , 2007 .

[10]  I. Budaiwi,et al.  The variation of thermal conductivity of fibrous insulation materials under different levels of moisture content , 2013 .

[11]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  A rational approach to the harmonisation of the thermal properties of building materials , 2009 .

[12]  A. Gustavsen,et al.  Moisture Buffering of Building Materials , 2005 .

[13]  Robert Černý,et al.  Effect of moisture content on heat and moisture transport and storage properties of thermal insulation materials , 2012 .

[14]  Folke Björk,et al.  A laboratory equipment for the study of moisture processes in thermal insulation materials when placed in a temperature field , 2008 .

[15]  K. Paine,et al.  Hygrothermal Performance of an Experimental Hemp-Lime Building , 2012 .

[16]  Monika Woloszyn,et al.  Dynamic coupling between vapour and heat transfer in wall assemblies: Analysis of measurements achieved under real climate , 2015 .

[17]  Asta Nicolajsen.  Thermal transmittance of a cellulose loose-fill insulation material , 2005 .

[18]  Azra Korjenic,et al.  Development and performance evaluation of natural thermal-insulation materials composed of renewable resources , 2011 .

[19]  Francesca Stazi,et al.  Assessment of the actual hygrothermal performance of glass mineral wool insulation applied 25 years ago in masonry cavity walls , 2014 .

[20]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  Hygrothermal performance of wood-hemp insulation in timber frame wall panels with and without a vapour barrier , 2015 .

[21]  Andrew Wilkinson.  Compendium of Chemical Terminology , 1997 .

[22]  Yutaka Goto,et al.  Preliminary investigation of a vapor-open envelope tailored for subtropical climate , 2011 .

[23]  P. Walker,et al.  Moisture buffer potential of experimental wall assemblies incorporating formulated hemp-lime , 2015 .

[24]  Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekera,et al.  An experimental study of moisture buffering of bio-insulations in lofts , 2014 .

[25]  Brian Anderson,et al.  Uncertainty in the thermal conductivity of insulation materials , 2010 .

[26]  Florence Collet,et al.  Water vapor properties of two hemp wools manufactured with different treatments , 2011 .

[27]  Hua Ge,et al.  Hygrothermal performance of cross-laminated timber wall assemblies with built-in moisture: field measurements and simulations , 2014 .