Personal Excursions: Investigating the Dynamics of Student Engagement

We investigate the dynamics of student engagement as it is manifest in self-directed, self-motivated, relatively long-term, computer-based scientific image processing activities. The raw data for the study are video records of 19 students, grades 7 to 11, who participated in intensive 6-week, extension summer courses. From this raw data we select episodes in which students appear to be highly engaged with the subject matter. We then attend to the fine-grained texture of students’ actions, identifying a core set of phenomena that cut across engagement episodes. Analyzed as a whole, these phenomena suggest that when working in self-directed, self-motivated mode, students pursue proposed activities but sporadically and spontaneously venture into self-initiated activities. Students’ recurring self-initiated activities – which we call personal excursions – are detours from proposed activities, but which align to a greater or lesser extent with the goals of such activities. Because of the deeply personal nature of excursions, they often result in students collecting resources that feed back into both subsequent excursions and framed activities. Having developed an understanding of students’ patterns of self-directed, self-motivated engagement, we then identify four factors that seem to bear most strongly on such patterns: (1) students’ competence (broadly construed); (2) features of the software-based activities, and how such features allowed students to express their competence; (3) the time allotted for students to pursue proposed activities, as well as self-initiated ones; and (4) the flexibility of the computational environment within which the activities were implemented.

[1]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education , 2002 .

[2]  E. Deci The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. , 1992 .

[3]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving , 1992 .

[4]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  User interface design , 1990, ACM Press Frontier Series.

[5]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[6]  Diane K. Kovacs,et al.  Computers, Communication and Mental Models , 1996 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. , 1988 .

[8]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Students’ Criteria for Representational Adequacy , 2002 .

[9]  Rafael Granados,et al.  Constructing intersubjectivity in representational design activities , 2000 .

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[11]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  What Students Should Know About Technology: The Case of Scientific Visualization , 1999 .

[12]  Flávio S. Azevedo Designing representations of terrain: A study in meta-representational competence , 2000 .

[13]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .

[14]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Role Of Interest In Learning And Development , 1994 .

[15]  Bruce L. Sherin,et al.  How students invent representations of motion: A genetic account , 2000 .

[16]  Fred M. Newmann,et al.  Continuing the bifurcation of affect and cognition , 1996 .

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[18]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[19]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[20]  K. Ann Renninger,et al.  Interest, Learning and Development , 1992 .

[21]  J. Dewey,et al.  Interest and Effort in Education , 1975 .

[22]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[23]  M. Maehr Advances in Motivation and Achievement , 1991 .

[24]  Donald R. Brown,et al.  Student motivation, cognition, and learning : essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie , 1994 .

[25]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[26]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Images of Learning , 1992 .

[27]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Meta-representation: an introduction , 2000 .

[28]  Claude Janvier Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics , 1987 .

[29]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century , 2000 .

[30]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives , 1997 .

[31]  M. Linn,et al.  Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners , 2000 .

[32]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[33]  C. Dweck Self-theories and goals: their role in motivation, personality, and development. , 1990, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[34]  J. Roschelle Designing for cognitive communication: epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? , 1997, Computers, Communication and Mental Models.

[35]  Andra A. DiSessa Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[36]  S. Woolgar,et al.  Representation in Scientific Practice , 1990 .

[37]  Paul Cobb,et al.  An Initial Contribution to the Development of a Design Theory of Mathematical Interests: The Case of Statistical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[38]  Uri Wilensky,et al.  Networked Gridlock: Students Enacting Complex Dynamic Phenomena with the HubNet Architecture , 2000 .

[39]  K. Ann Renninger,et al.  Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. , 1992 .

[40]  D. Hickey,et al.  A comparative, sociocultural analysis of context and motivation. , 2001 .

[41]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[42]  M. Lepper,et al.  A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation , 1992 .

[43]  S. Järvelä,et al.  Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications , 2001 .

[44]  J. Greeno,et al.  Practicing Representation: Learning with and about Representational Forms , 1997 .

[45]  James Paul Gee,et al.  话语分析入门 : 理论与方法 = An introduction to discourse analysis : theory and method , 1999 .