Supply chain development as a knowledge development task

The study utilises two research streams of knowledge management – knowledge maturity models and strategies of accelerating the knowledge creation in an organisation – to understand and support the adoption of complex practices of Supply Chain Management (SCM). Generic development strategies called bottom-up, top-down and middle-up-down are derived from the theories and evaluated in two case companies representing different industries but the same development area, inventory management. The case study is organised into two parts. First, the development to date is presented in both case companies and the cases are used to identify the basic prerequisites, advantages and disadvantages of the bottom-up and top-down strategies. Second, potential development strategies for the future are analysed. The findings of the case studies suggest that the selection between different strategies is related to the cultural and organisational environments, the complexity caused by the issue itself and by climbing the knowledge maturity stages, and the relative importance of the issue to be developed. As a result the study gives guidelines to development strategy selection, especially focusing to two crucial questions: where do you expect the knowledge to be accumulated and in what form do you expect the knowledge to be stored and communicated.

[1]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[2]  I. Nonaka Toward Middle-Up-Down Management: Accelerating Information Creation , 1988 .

[3]  Kirsi Korhonen,et al.  Role game as a method to increase cross-functional understanding in a supply chain , 2007 .

[4]  Ulf Malmquist,et al.  Decentralizing knowledge: managing knowledge work in a software engineering firm , 2001 .

[5]  Julia Balogun,et al.  From Blaming the Middle to Harnessing its Potential: Creating Change Intermediaries , 2003 .

[6]  Abdus Sattar Chaudhry,et al.  Performance Measures for Knowledge Management , 2002, J. Inf. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Chapter 17 – Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge , 1998 .

[8]  Edward Toomer,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Management Research , 1989 .

[9]  A. Martini,et al.  Managing dispersed workers: the new challenge in Knowledge Management , 2006 .

[10]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  A Maturity Model for the Implementation of Software Process Improvement: an Empirical Study , 2022 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Theory of the Knowledge-Creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis , 2005 .

[12]  C. Duguay,et al.  Key lessons from the implementation of an ERP at Pratt & Whitney Canada , 2005 .

[13]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  Supporting continuous learning in a large organization: the role of group and organizational perspectives. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  J. Rabin,et al.  Organizational Downsizing: An Introduction , 1999 .

[16]  Hannu Kärkkäinen,et al.  Understanding the knowledge accumulation process—Implications for the adoption of inventory management techniques , 2009 .

[17]  Athanasia Pouloudi,et al.  Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management: hard, soft and abstract issues , 2002 .

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[19]  J. Shapiro Modeling the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[20]  Anja Schulze,et al.  How to Support Knowledge Creation in New Product Development:: An Investigation of Knowledge Management Methods , 2005 .

[21]  Thomas J. Housel,et al.  Measuring the Return on Knowledge Embedded in Information Technology , 2001, ICIS.

[22]  T. Corsi,et al.  Adopting new technologies for supply chain management , 2003 .

[23]  Primoz Perc,et al.  A Maturity Model for Quality Improvement in Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[24]  Virpi Leivo,et al.  Measurement of the quality and maturity of the innovation process: methodology and case of a medium sized Finnish company , 2004 .

[25]  E. Çivi Knowledge management as a competitive asset: a review , 2000 .

[26]  L. Ellram THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 1996 .