Temporal differentiation of background systems in LCA: relevance of adding temporal information in LCI databases

PurposeBecause the potential impacts of emissions and extractions can be sensitive to timing, the temporal aggregation of life cycle inventory (LCI) data has often been cited as a limitation in life cycle assessment (LCA). Until now, examples of temporal emission and extraction distributions were restricted to the foreground processes of product systems. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the relevance of considering the temporal distribution of the background system inventory.MethodsThe paper focuses on the global warming impact category for which so-called dynamic characterization factors (CFs) were developed and uses the ecoinvent v2.2 database as both an example database to which temporal information can be added and a source of product systems to test the relevance of adding temporal information to the background system. Temporal information was added to the elementary and intermediate exchanges of 22 % of the unit processes in the database. Using the enhanced structure path analysis (ESPA) method to generate temporally differentiated LCIs in conjunction with time-dependent global warming characterization factors, potential impacts were calculated for all 4,034 product systems in the ecoinvent database.Results and discussionEach time, the results were calculated for (1) systems in which temporal information was only added to the first two tiers, representing studies in which only the foreground system is temporally differentiated, and (2) systems in which temporal information was also added to the background system. For 8.6 % of the database product systems, adding temporal differentiation to background unit processes affected the global warming impact scores by more than 10 %. For most of the affected product systems, considering temporal information in the background unit processes decreased the global warming impact scores. The sectors that show most sensitivity to the temporal differentiation of background unit processes are associated with wood and biofuel sectors.ConclusionsEven though the addition of temporal information to unit processes in LCI databases would not benefit every LCA study, the enhancement can be relevant. It allows for a more accurate global warming impact assessment, especially for LCAs in which products of biomass are present in substantial amounts. Relevance for other impact categories could be discussed in further work.

[1]  M Guo,et al.  LCA data quality: sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum , 2009 .

[3]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Incorporating time-corrected life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in vehicle regulations. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Efficient algorithms for Life Cycle Assessment, Input-Output Analysis, and Monte-Carlo Analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment sophistication , 1999 .

[6]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[7]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Assessing temporary carbon sequestration and storage projects through land use, land-use change and forestry: comparison of dynamic life cycle assessment with ton-year approaches , 2012, Climatic Change.

[8]  Brenda Chang,et al.  Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  How to take time into account in the inventory step: a selective introduction based on sensitivity analysis , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry , 2015 .

[11]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Systematic disaggregation: a hybrid LCI computation algorithm enhancing interpretation phase in LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Other,et al.  Global guidance principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases: a basis for greener processes and products , 2011 .

[13]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[14]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots , 2009 .

[16]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Evaluating the relevance of seasonal differentiation of human health intake fractions in life cycle assessment , 2012, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[17]  L Reijnders,et al.  Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. III: Export of potential impact over time and space. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[18]  Harnpon Phungrassami.  A Review of Time Consideration in Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[19]  P. Andrada,et al.  Life cycle analysis on the design of induction motors , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  J. M. Watkins,et al.  Canadian International Polar Year (2007–2008): an introduction , 2012, Climatic Change.

[21]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[22]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Valuing temporary carbon storage , 2012 .

[23]  Didier Beloin-Saint-Pierre,et al.  The ESPA (Enhanced Structural Path Analysis) method: a solution to an implementation challenge for dynamic life cycle assessment studies , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[25]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Site‐Dependent Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment of Acidification , 1998 .

[26]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[27]  R. Ries,et al.  A characterization model with spatial and temporal resolution for life cycle impact assessment of photochemical precursors in the United States , 2009 .

[28]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Power series expansion and structural analysis for life cycle assessment , 2007 .

[29]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[30]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .