Role of the Amygdala in Decision‐Making

Abstract: The somatic marker hypothesis proposes that both the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex are parts of a neural circuit critical for judgment and decision‐making. Although both structures couple exteroceptive sensory information with interoceptive information concerning somatic/emotional states, they do so at different levels, thus making different contributions to the process. We define ‘primary inducers’ as stimuli that unconditionally, or through learning (e.g., conditioning and semantic knowledge), can (perceptually or subliminally) produce states that are pleasurable or aversive. Encountering a fear object (e.g., a snake), a stimulus predictive of a snake, or semantic information such as winning or losing a large sum of money are all examples of primary inducers. ‘Secondary inducers’ are entities generated by the recall of a personal or hypothetical emotional event or perceiving a primary inducer that generates ‘thoughts’ and ‘memories’ about the inducer, all of which, when they are brought to memory, elicit a somatic state. The episodic memory of encountering a snake, losing a large sum of money, imagining the gain of a large sum of money, or hearing or looking at primary inducers that bring to memory ‘thoughts’ pertaining to an emotional event are all examples of secondary inducers. We present evidence in support of the hypothesis that the amygdala is a critical substrate in the neural system necessary for triggering somatic states from primary inducers. The ventromedial cortex is a critical substrate in the neural system necessary for the triggering of somatic states from secondary inducers. The amygdala system is a priori a necessary step for the normal development of the orbitofrontal system for triggering somatic states from secondary inducers. However, once this orbitofrontal system is developed, the induction of somatic states by secondary inducers via the orbitofrontal system is less dependent on the amygdala system. Perhaps the amygdala is equivalent to the hippocampus with regard to emotions, that is, necessary for acquiring new emotional attributes (anterograde emotions), but not for retrieving old emotional attributes (retrograde emotions). Given the numerous lesion and functional neuroimaging studies illustrating the involvement of the amygdala in complex cognitive and behavioral functions, including ‘social cognition,’ we suggest that this involvement is a manifestation of a more fundamental function mediated by the amygdala, which is to couple stimuli/entities with their emotional attributes, that is, the processing of somatic states from primary inducers.

[1]  H. Klüver,et al.  PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONS OF THE TEMPORAL LOBES IN MONKEYS , 1939 .

[2]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Changes in autonomic responsiveness following bilateral amygdalotomyin humans , 1988 .

[3]  R. Leiguarda,et al.  Asymbolia for pain: A sensory‐limbic disconnection syndrome , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[4]  B T Hyman,et al.  Neuropsychological correlates of bilateral amygdala damage. , 1990, Archives of neurology.

[5]  L. Squire,et al.  Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: Separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala , 1991, Hippocampus.

[6]  Michael Davis,et al.  The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotional Memory: In Search of Systems and Synapses a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Emotional memory systems in the brain , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala , 1994, Nature.

[10]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[11]  A. Damasio REVIEW ■ : Toward a Neurobiology of Emotion and Feeling: Operational Concepts and Hypotheses , 1995 .

[12]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Impaired fear conditioning following unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans , 1995, Science.

[14]  A. Damasio,et al.  Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  E. Murray,et al.  Excitotoxic Lesions of the Amygdala Fail to Produce Impairment in Visual Learning for Auditory Secondary Reinforcement But Interfere with Reinforcer Devaluation Effects in Rhesus Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[17]  R. Lane,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of happiness, sadness, and disgust. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  R. J. Dolan,et al.  Differential neural response to positive and negative feedback in planning and guessing tasks , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The human amygdala in social judgment , 1998, Nature.

[20]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Clinical and physiological effects of stereotaxic bilateral amygdalotomy for intractable aggression. , 1998, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[21]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Human Amygdala Activation during Conditioned Fear Acquisition and Extinction: a Mixed-Trial fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[22]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Orbitofrontal Cortex and Representation of Incentive Value in Associative Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Elliott,et al.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediates guessing , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  T. Robbins,et al.  Choosing between Small, Likely Rewards and Large, Unlikely Rewards Activates Inferior and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Parsons,et al.  Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[27]  G. Schoenbaum,et al.  Functions of the Amygdala and Related Forebrain Areas in Attention and Cognition , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  T. Bussey,et al.  Role of prefrontal cortex in a network for arbitrary visuomotor mapping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Differential amygdala responses to winning and losing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  H. Damasio,et al.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  A. Damasio,et al.  Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  T. Robbins,et al.  Second-order schedules of drug reinforcement in rats and monkeys: measurement of reinforcing efficacy and drug-seeking behaviour , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[33]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Different lateral amygdala outputs mediate reactions and actions elicited by a fear-arousing stimulus , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  S P Wise,et al.  The role of ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex in conditional visuomotor learning and strategy use in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  L M Parsons,et al.  New Evidence for Distinct Right and Left Brain Systems for Deductive versus Probabilistic Reasoning. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.