Unraveling the geometry of the Farallon plate: Synthesis of three-dimensional imaging results from USArray

Abstract We compare 12 recent three-dimensional (3D) seismic imaging results that made extensive use of data from the Earthscope Transportable Array (TA). Our goal is to sort out what can be said about the geometry of the Farallon plate. Our main approach is 3D visualization using a kinematic plate motion model as a framework. Comparison of results from all 12 image volumes indicates that the results are most consistent with a single, coherent Farallon slab overridden by North American. The Farallon can be tracked from the trench in the Pacific Northwest to its remnants in the lower mantle under eastern North America. From the trench the lithosphere has a low dip to the volcanic arc. Immediately east of the arc the slab steepens sharply before undergoing a decrease in dip above the 410 km discontinuity. The gently dipping section varies along strike. Under Washington the deflection is minor but to the south the slab flattens to become nearly horizontal beneath southern Idaho. There is a strong agreement that the high velocity anomaly associated with the slab vanishes under eastern Oregon. Scattered wave imaging results, however, suggest the top of the anomaly is continuous. These can be reconciled if one assumes the wavespeed anomaly has been neutralized by processes linked to the Yellowstone system. We find that all results are consistent with a 4D kinematic model of the Mendocino slab window under Nevada and Utah. In the eastern US the larger scale models all show a lower mantle anomaly related to the older history of Farallon subduction. The link between the lower mantle and new results in the U.S. Cordillera lies under the High Plains where the required USArray coverage is not yet complete. Image volumes in a unified format are supplied in an electronic supplement.

[1]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Three-dimensional, wavefield imaging of broadband seismic array data , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  G. Masters,et al.  Global P and PP traveltime tomography: rays versus waves , 2004 .

[3]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Two-stage subduction history under North America inferred from multiple-frequency tomography , 2008 .

[4]  L. Elkins‐Tanton,et al.  Vertical mantle flow associated with a lithospheric drip beneath the Great Basin , 2009 .

[5]  C. Faccenna,et al.  Subduction-triggered magmatic pulses: A new class of plumes? , 2010 .

[6]  R. Allen,et al.  The Fate of the Juan de Fuca Plate , 2007 .

[7]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Upper Mantle Heterogeneity beneath North America from Travel Time Tomography with Global and USArray Transportable Array Data , 2008 .

[8]  J. A. Snoke,et al.  Rayleigh-wave phase-velocity maps and three-dimensional shear velocity structure of the western US from local non-plane surface wave tomography , 2010 .

[9]  H. P. Crotwell High data volume seismology: Surviving the avalanche , 2007 .

[10]  E. Humphreys,et al.  Seismic heterogeneity and small‐scale convection in the southern California upper mantle , 2010 .

[11]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Three‐dimensional, prestack, plane wave migration of teleseismic P‐to‐S converted phases: 2. Stacking multiple events , 2003 .

[12]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Missing roots and mantle “drips”: Regional Pn and teleseismic arrival times in the southern Sierra Nevada and vicinity, California , 1994 .

[13]  T. Atwater Plate tectonic history of the northeast Pacific and western North America , 1989 .

[14]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes—I. Theory , 2000 .

[15]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Model Update March 2011: Upper Mantle Heterogeneity beneath North America from Traveltime Tomography with Global and USArray Transportable Array Data , 2012 .

[16]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Multiple‐frequency SH‐wave tomography of the western US upper mantle , 2008 .

[17]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Model Update December 2008: Upper Mantle Heterogeneity beneath North America from P-wave Travel Time Tomography with Global and USArray Transportable Array Data , 2009 .

[18]  Gary L. Pavlis,et al.  Three‐dimensional, prestack, plane wave migration of teleseismic P‐to‐S converted phases: 1. Theory , 2003 .

[19]  Mei Xue,et al.  Slab‐plume interaction beneath the Pacific Northwest , 2010 .

[20]  E. Engdahl,et al.  A new global model for P wave speed variations in Earth's mantle , 2008 .

[21]  Heather Bedle,et al.  S velocity variations beneath North America , 2009 .

[22]  Brandon Schmandt,et al.  Complex subduction and small-scale convection revealed by body-wave tomography of the western United States upper mantle , 2010 .

[23]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes , 1995 .

[24]  G. Pavlis Direct Imaging of the Coda of Teleseismic P Waves , 2013 .

[25]  W. Snyder,et al.  Geometry of Subducted Slabs Related to San Andreas Transform , 1979, The Journal of Geology.

[26]  G. Nolet,et al.  Measuring finite‐frequency body‐wave amplitudes and traveltimes , 2006 .

[27]  T. J. Owens,et al.  Active foundering of a continental arc root beneath the southern Sierra Nevada in California , 2004, Nature.

[28]  Thomas J. Owens,et al.  Automated Receiver Function Processing , 2005 .

[29]  R. Carlson,et al.  Three‐dimensional seismic velocity structure of the northwestern United States , 2008 .

[30]  J. Nábělek,et al.  Deconvolution of teleseismic body waves for enhancing structure beneath a seismometer array , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  E. Humphreys,et al.  Seismically imaged relict slab from the 55 Ma Siletzia accretion to the northwest United States , 2011 .

[32]  G. Pavlis Three-dimensional wavefield imaging of data from the USArray: New constraints on the geometry of the Farallon slab , 2011 .

[33]  Karin Sigloch,et al.  Mantle provinces under North America from multifrequency P wave tomography , 2011 .

[34]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Evidence for deep mantle circulation from global tomography , 1997, Nature.

[35]  J. Gillis,et al.  Linear Differential Operators , 1963 .

[36]  Allan Cox,et al.  Relative Motions Between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin , 1986 .

[37]  J. VanDecar Upper-mantle structure of the Cascadia subduction zone from non-linear teleseismic travel-time inversion , 1991 .

[38]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[39]  Lapo Boschi,et al.  A comparison of tomographic and geodynamic mantle models , 2002 .

[40]  W. Snyder,et al.  Geometry of triple junctions related to San Andreas Transform , 1979 .

[41]  Colin A. Zelt,et al.  Modelling strategies and model assessment for wide-angle seismic traveltime data , 1999 .

[42]  R. Allen,et al.  Lithosphere-asthenosphere interaction beneath the western United States from the joint inversion of body-wave traveltimes and surface-wave phase velocities , 2011 .

[43]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Systematic variation in the depths of slabs beneath arc volcanoes , 2004 .

[44]  T. Atwater Implications of Plate Tectonics for the Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of Western North America , 1970 .

[45]  C. Carrigan,et al.  Small-Scale Convective Instability and Upper Mantle Viscosity Under California , 1993, Science.

[46]  G. Nolet,et al.  Upper mantle S velocity structure of North America , 1997 .

[47]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Radially anisotropic shear velocity structure of the upper mantle globally and beneath North America , 2008 .

[48]  R. Carlson,et al.  Slab fragmentation, edge flow and the origin of the Yellowstone hotspot track , 2011 .

[49]  G. Zandt,et al.  Thin crust and active upper mantle beneath the Southern Sierra Nevada in the western United States , 1998 .

[50]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Computing traveltime and amplitude sensitivity kernels in finite-frequency tomography , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[51]  S. Grand Mantle shear structure beneath the Americas and surrounding oceans , 1994 .

[52]  G. Nolet,et al.  Global upper‐mantle structure from finite‐frequency surface‐wave tomography , 2004 .

[53]  D. James,et al.  Receiver function imaging of upper mantle complexity beneath the Pacific Northwest, United States , 2010 .

[54]  J. Tarduno,et al.  A revised kinematic model for the relative motion between Pacific oceanic plates and North America since the Late Cretaceous , 2008 .

[55]  William Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit: An Object-Oriented Approach to 3-D Graphics , 1997 .

[56]  S. Lee,et al.  Surface Wave Tomography Applied to the North American Upper Mantle , 2013 .

[57]  M. L. Miller,et al.  Life and death of the Resurrection plate: Evidence for its existence and subduction in the northeastern Pacific in Paleocene-Eocene time , 2003 .

[58]  S. Cummer,et al.  Rare measurements of a sprite with halo event driven by a negative lightning discharge over Argentina , 2008 .

[59]  P. Lonsdale Geology and tectonic history of the Gulf of California , 1989 .

[60]  John C. VanDecar,et al.  Determination of teleseismic relative phase arrival times using multi-channel cross-correlation and least squares , 1990 .

[61]  R. Allen,et al.  Slab morphology in the Cascadia fore arc and its relation to episodic tremor and slip , 2010 .

[62]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Structure of North American mantle constrained by simultaneous inversion of multiple‐frequency SH, SS, and Love waves , 2011 .