Methods for Second Order Meta-Analysis and Illustrative Applications

[1]  E. Ghiselli.  Theory of psychological measurement , 1964 .

[2]  J. Keats,et al.  Test theory. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  G. Barrie Wetherill,et al.  Random Effects Models , 1981 .

[4]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  Review of developments in meta-analytic method. , 1986 .

[5]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[6]  Patricia B. Elmore,et al.  Correlational Meta-Analysis: Independent and Nonindependent Cases , 1992 .

[7]  J. Salgado.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  J. Salgado,et al.  Big Five personality dimensions and job performance in Army and civil occupations: A European perspective. , 1998 .

[9]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge , 2000 .

[10]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  N. Anderson,et al.  Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology , 2001 .

[12]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Paul E. Spector.  Research Methods In Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Data Collection and Data Analysis With Special Consideration To International Issues , 2001 .

[14]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[15]  P. Sackett.  The status of validity generalization research: Key issues in drawing inferences from cumulative research findings. , 2003 .

[16]  Udo Konradt,et al.  Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1: Personnel Psychology; Vol. 2: Organizational Psychology) , 2004 .

[17]  William H. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research , 2006 .

[18]  Karin A. Orvis,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[20]  Frank L. Schmidt,et al.  Increased Accuracy for Range Restriction Corrections: Implications for the Role of Personality and General Mental Ability in Job and Training Performance , 2008 .

[21]  Xiao-Hua Zhou,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta‐Analysis , 2008 .

[22]  L. Hedges,et al.  Notes on Subgroup Analyses and Meta‐Regression , 2009, Introduction to Meta‐Analysis.

[23]  In-Sue Oh.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in East Asia: A cross -cultural validity generalization study , 2009 .

[24]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. , 2009 .

[25]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. , 2009, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[26]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[27]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Do East Asians Respond More/Less Strongly to Organizational Justice than North Americans? A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[28]  Frank L Schmidt,et al.  The impact of research synthesis methods on industrial–organizational psychology: The road from pessimism to optimism about cumulative knowledge , 2010, Research synthesis methods.

[29]  G. Hofstede.  The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance , 2010 .

[30]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better , 2010, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[31]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Detecting and Correcting the Lies That Data Tell , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[32]  Hannah R Rothstein,et al.  A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis , 2010, Research synthesis methods.

[33]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Comparison of Weights for Meta-Analysis of r and d Under Realistic Conditions , 2011 .

[34]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research , 2011 .

[35]  Catherine M. Dalton,et al.  Debunking Myths and Urban Legends About Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[36]  Jessica L. Wildman,et al.  A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams , 2011 .

[37]  T. A. Wright,et al.  Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis , 2011 .

[38]  Dan J. Putka,et al.  Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  Citing and Building on Meta-Analytic Findings , 2011 .

[40]  R. Arvey,et al.  Meta-Analysis and the Development of Knowledge , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  Patrick H. Raymark,et al.  The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Harris Cooper,et al.  The overview of reviews: unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. , 2012, The American psychologist.

[43]  H. Rothstein,et al.  Revealed or Concealed? Transparency of Procedures, Decisions, and Judgment Calls in Meta-Analyses , 2012 .

[44]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Publication Bias in the Organizational Sciences , 2012 .