Nanotechnology‐Enabled Closed Loop Insulin Delivery Device: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Glucose‐Regulated Insulin Release for Diabetes Control

Recently, a new multifunctional, bio-inorganic nanocomposite membrane with the ability to self-regulate the release of insulin in response to blood glucose (BG) levels was reported. Herein, the application of this material as part of a small, implantable, closed-loop insulin delivery device designed to continuously monitor BG concentrations and regulate insulin release is proposed. The insulin delivery device consists of a nanocomposite glucose-responsive plug covalently bound to an insulin reservoir made of surface-modified silicone. The plug is prepared with crosslinked bovine serum albumin (BSA) and enzymes (glucose oxidase (GOx) and catalase (CAT)), pH-responsive hydrogel nanoparticles, and multifunctional MnO2 nanoparticles. The plug functions both as a glucose sensor and controlled delivery unit to release higher rates of insulin from the reservoir in response to hyperglycemic BG levels and basal insulin rates at normal BG concentration. The surfaces of the device are modified by silanization followed by PEGylation to ensure its safety and biocompatibility and the stability of encased insulin. Our results show that insulin release can be modulated in vitro in response to glucose concentrations. In vivo experiments show that the glycemia of diabetic rats can be controlled with implantation of the prototype device. The glucose-responsiveness of the device is also demonstrated by rapid drop in BG level after challenging diabetic rats with bolus injection of glucose solution. In addition, it is demonstrated that surface PEGylation of the device is necessary for reducing the immune response of the host to the implanted foreign object and maintaining insulin stability and bioactivity. With this molecular architecture and the bio-inorganic nanocomposite plug, the device has the ability to maintain normal BG levels in diabetic rats.

[1]  N Kossovsky,et al.  Biocompatibility of Silicone Implants , 1983, Annals of plastic surgery.

[2]  A. Mikos,et al.  Modification of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) macromer with a GRGD peptide for the preparation of functionalized polymer networks. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.

[3]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  The future of open‐ and closed‐loop insulin delivery systems , 2008, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[4]  Bogdan Catargi,et al.  Chemically controlled closed-loop insulin delivery. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of covalently coupled quaternary ammonium silane coatings on silicone rubber. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[6]  Zhiyong Wang,et al.  GLUT2 in Pancreatic Islets: Crucial Target Molecule in Diabetes Induced With Multiple Low Doses of Streptozotocin in Mice , 1998, Diabetes.

[7]  A. Oliva,et al.  Influence of temperature and shaking on stability of insulin preparations : degradation kinetics , 1996 .

[8]  M. Treuheit,et al.  Mono-N-terminal poly(ethylene glycol)-protein conjugates. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[9]  K. Polonsky,et al.  C-peptide and insulin secretion. Relationship between peripheral concentrations of C-peptide and insulin and their secretion rates in the dog. , 1984, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[10]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[11]  B. Zinman,et al.  Insulins today and beyond , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Artificial pancreas: an emerging approach to treat Type 1 diabetes , 2009, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  N. Taulier,et al.  On the stability of Insulin delivered through a new glucose‐responsive polymeric composite membrane , 2004, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[14]  J. Tamada,et al.  Kinetics of insulin aggregation in aqueous solutions upon agitation in the presence of hydrophobic surfaces. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  X. Wu,et al.  Temperature and pH-responsive polymeric composite membranes for controlled delivery of proteins and peptides. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[16]  M. Bentley,et al.  Chemistry for peptide and protein PEGylation. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[17]  Joseph Kost,et al.  Smart polymers for responsive drug-delivery systems , 2008, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[18]  T. Vladkova Surface modification of silicone rubber with poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel coatings , 2004 .

[19]  J. E. Kudlow,et al.  The potential mechanism of the diabetogenic action of streptozotocin: inhibition of pancreatic beta-cell O-GlcNAc-selective N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[20]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Mechanism of insulin aggregation and stabilization in agitated aqueous solutions , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  S. W. Kim,et al.  In Situ Study of Insulin Aggregation Induced by Water-Organic Solvent Interface , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.

[22]  T. Wong Design of oral insulin delivery systems , 2010, Journal of drug targeting.

[23]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Modulated insulin permeation across a glucose-sensitive polymeric composite membrane. , 2002, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[24]  V. Uversky,et al.  Effect of environmental factors on the kinetics of insulin fibril formation: elucidation of the molecular mechanism. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[25]  David J S Birch,et al.  Nanomedicine and its potential in diabetes research and practice , 2008, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[26]  Jeandidier,et al.  Current status and future prospects of parenteral insulin regimens, strategies and delivery systems for diabetes treatment. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[27]  C. Yip,et al.  Microdomain pH Gradient and Kinetics Inside Composite Polymeric Membranes of pH and Glucose Sensitivity , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[28]  J. Leahy,et al.  Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Versus Semiautomated Hybrid Control in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Artificial Pancreas , 2008 .

[29]  X. Wu,et al.  Glucose‐Responsive Bioinorganic Nanohybrid Membrane for Self‐Regulated Insulin Release , 2010 .

[30]  R Langer,et al.  Responsive polymeric delivery systems. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[31]  G. Belfort,et al.  Surface-enhanced nucleation of insulin amyloid fibrillation. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.