E-Consultations: A Review of Current Practice and a Proposal for Opening Up the Process

Information and communication technologies have altered the relations between the political system and citizens. Policy-formulation is enhanced by e-consultations that extend the knowledge base and the legitimacy of policy-making. However, current e-consultation practice in the EU falls short of the potential. The paper proposes a deliberative turn, the use of special purpose technologies and the integration of social media discourse into the consultation process as means to further open it up and to strengthen the connection between government and citizens.

[1]  Thorsten Hüller.  Gut beraten? Die Online-Konsultationen der EU Kommission , 2008 .

[2]  J. Habermas.  Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln , 1983 .

[3]  Mark Thamm,et al.  Politician 2.0: Information Behavior and Dissemination on Social Networking Sites - Gaps and Best-Practices , 2011 .

[4]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[5]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Perception of nanotechnology in internet-based discussions , 2010 .

[6]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  eParticipation Initiatives in Europe: Learning from Practitioners , 2010, ePart.

[7]  M. Hilbert,et al.  The Maturing Concept of E-Democracy: From E-Voting and Online Consultations to Democratic Value Out of Jumbled Online Chatter , 2009 .

[8]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  ArgVis: Structuring Political Deliberations Using Innovative Visualisation Technologies , 2011, ePart.

[9]  Nikos Loutas,et al.  Inform-Consult-Empower: A Three-Tiered Approach to eParticipation , 2011, ePart.

[10]  Francesco Molinari,et al.  Making Sense of Gov 2.0 Strategies: “No Citizens, No Party” , 2010 .

[11]  Norah Jones,et al.  Get out of MySpace! , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[13]  A. Chadwick.  Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[14]  Michelle Anna Ruesch,et al.  Making the Case for Anonymity in E-Participation - An Evaluation of Real Name Policy in Gütersloh’s Second Participatory Budget , 2012 .

[15]  Christine Quittkat,et al.  The EU Commission consultation regime , 2008 .

[16]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Evaluation of an Argument Visualisation Platform by Experts and Policy Makers , 2011, ePart.

[17]  Michelle Anna Ruesch,et al.  From E to O - Towards Open Participation as a Guiding Principle of Open Government , 2012, EGOVIS/EDEM.

[18]  William A. Maloney,et al.  Opening EU-Governance to Civil Society: Gains and Challenges. , 2008 .

[19]  Scott Wright,et al.  Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[20]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Deliberative E-Rulemaking Project: Challenges to Enacting Real World Deliberation , 2012 .

[21]  J. Habermas,et al.  Faktizität und Geltung , 1992 .

[22]  Christine Quittkat,et al.  The European Commission's Online Consultations: A Success Story? , 2011 .

[23]  N. Nugent,et al.  European Commission , 1993, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[24]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Towards a Systematic Exploitation of Web 2.0 and Simulation Modeling Tools in Public Policy Process , 2010, ePart.

[25]  Tamim Bayoumi,et al.  Government for the People , 2007 .

[26]  J. Millard.  European eParticipation Summary Report , 2009 .

[27]  Almer S. Tigelaar,et al.  Automatic summarisation of discussion fora , 2010, Natural Language Engineering.

[28]  J. Bohman.  Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[29]  K. Tarabanis,et al.  Electronic Participation Policies and Initiatives in the European Union Institutions , 2012 .

[30]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  Argument Visualization for eParticipation: Towards a Research Agenda and Prototype Tool , 2011, ePart.

[31]  Todd Graham.  Beyond “Political” Communicative Spaces: Talking Politics on the Wife Swap Discussion Forum , 2012 .