Why Do People Reject New Technologies and Stymie Organizational Changes of which They Are in Favor? Exploring Misalignments between Social Interactions and Materiality

This paper explores the relationship between users' interpretations of a new technology and failure of organizational change. I suggest that people form interpretations of a new technology not only based on their conversations with others, but also through their use of technology's material features directly. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis of ethnographic data on the implementation and use of a computer simulation technology at a major automotive engineering firm, I show that engineers' communication with managers, coworkers, and customers led them to develop an interpretation about what the technology was supposed to do while their interactions with the material features of complementary technologies led them to develop an interpretation that the new simulation technology was not an efficient tool for that specific purpose. I show how the interpretations developed from people's material interactions moderate the effects of the interpretations developed through social interactions on willingness to use the technology in the future. I then demonstrate that, in this particular setting, engineers inadvertently stymied an organizational change of which they were very much in favor by reducing their use of the new technology. I conclude by discussing how misalignments between the information generated in users' interactions with others and with technologies' material features can lead to the failure of planned organizational change.

[1]  Guowei Jian “Omega is a Four-Letter Word”: Toward a Tension-Centered Model of Resistance to Information and Communication Technologies , 2007 .

[2]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[3]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in Task-based Offshoring , 2008, MIS Q..

[4]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[5]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[6]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[7]  Michele H. Jackson The Meaning of “Communication Technology”: The Technology-Context Scheme , 1996 .

[8]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[9]  S. Barley The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[10]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building , 2000 .

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  On the Study of Technology and Task: A Variable-Based Approach , 1990 .

[12]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. , 1992 .

[13]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Problematizing "New Media": Culturally Based Perceptions of Cell Phones, Computers, and the Internet among United States Latinos , 2003 .

[14]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[15]  E. Davidson A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[17]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Cognitive Elements in the Implementation of New Technology: Can Less Information Provide More Benefits? , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[19]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[20]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Technochange management: using IT to drive organizational change , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[22]  Janet Fulk Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[23]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[26]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[27]  Catherine Griffiths,et al.  Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective , 1986, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Innovation Modification During Intraorganizational Adoption , 1993 .

[29]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Cognitive Elements in the Social Construction of Communication Technology , 1995 .

[30]  R. Rice,et al.  Attitudes toward New Organizational Technology: Network Proximity as a Mechanism for Social Information Processing. , 1991 .

[31]  R. Rice,et al.  New Media and Organizational Structuring , 2001 .

[32]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The Sage handbook of organizational communication : advances in theory, research, and methods , 2001 .

[33]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[34]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[35]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Individual and structural influences on information technology helping relationships , 1999 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[37]  Kailash Joshi,et al.  A Model of Users' Perspective on Change: The Case of Information Systems Technology Implementation , 1991, MIS Q..

[38]  R. Rice Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation , 1987 .

[39]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[40]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[41]  R. Rice,et al.  Book Reviews : Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems , 1987 .

[42]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[43]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[44]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Don't hang up: Organizational diffusion of the intelligent telephone , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Steven Hornik,et al.  Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation , 1996 .

[46]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[48]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[49]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[50]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Socio-Theoretic Accounts of IS: The Problem of Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[51]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Change Implementation as a Communication Problem: A Review of Literature and Research Agenda , 1998 .

[52]  G. Pisano,et al.  Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals , 2001 .

[53]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[54]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology in Studies of the Workplace , 2002 .

[55]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[56]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 2006 .

[57]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[58]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[59]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Handbook of new media : social shaping and consequences of ICTs , 2002 .

[60]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[61]  E. Goffman The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address , 1983 .

[62]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Material Works: Exploring the Situated Entanglement of Technological Performativity and Human Agency , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[64]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  The surface of emergence in systems development: agency, institutions, and large-scale information systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[65]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Democracy Squared: Designing On-Line Political Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[66]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Transforming Work Through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  P. Boczkowski Bridging STS and communication studies: Scholarship on media and information technologies , 2007 .

[68]  Rudy Hirschheim Office automation - a social and organizational perspective , 1986, John Wiley Information systems series.

[69]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[70]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. , 1962 .

[71]  J. Sinacore Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[72]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Indeterminacy and the Discourse of Inevitability in International Technology Management , 2008 .

[73]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[74]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Communication during intraorganizational innovation adoption: Predicting users' behavioral coping responses to innovations in organizations , 1996 .

[75]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .