Pedestrians, vehicles, and cell phones.

With cellular phones and portable music players becoming a staple in everyday life, questions have arisen regarding the attentional deficits that might occur when such devices are used while performing other tasks. Here, we used a street-crossing task in an immersive virtual environment to test how this sort of divided attention affects pedestrian behavior when crossing a busy street. Thirty-six participants navigated through a series of unsigned intersections by walking on a manual treadmill in a virtual environment. While crossing, participants were undistracted, engaged in a hands free cell phone conversation, or listening to music on an iPod. Pedestrians were less likely to successfully cross the road when conversing on a cell phone than when listening to music, even though they took more time to initiate their crossing when conversing on a cell phone ( approximately 1.5s). This success rate difference was driven largely by failures to cross the road in the allotted trial time period (30s), suggesting that when conversing on a cell phone pedestrians are less likely to recognize and act on crossing opportunities.

[1]  Julie Hatfield,et al.  The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Christian Wallraven,et al.  Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization , 2007, APGV.

[3]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Lucy Johnston,et al.  An investigation of road crossing in a virtual environment. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Joan Severson,et al.  Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  J. Cremer,et al.  Children's Road Crossing , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[7]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Time-to-contact , 1998 .

[10]  Richard Wener,et al.  Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[12]  M. Manosevitz High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , .

[13]  Timothy Chamberlain,et al.  The effect of audio materials from a rear-seat audiovisual entertainment system or from radio on simulated driving , 2008 .

[14]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[15]  Bobby Bodenheimer,et al.  Discrimination and estimation of time-to-contact for approaching traffic using a desktop environment , 2006, APGV '06.

[16]  H. Heuer,et al.  Estimates of Time to Contact Based on Changing Size and Changing Target Vergence , 1993, Perception.

[17]  Reinoud J Bootsma,et al.  Global and Local Contributions to the Optical Specification of Time to Contact: Observer Sensitivity to Composite Tau , 2002, Perception.

[18]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Attentional control, high intensity pleasure, and risky pedestrian behavior in college students. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[20]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[21]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.