Applying the concept of exponential approach to enhance the assessment capability of FMEA

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) has been used to identify the critical risk events and predict a system failure to avoid or reduce the potential failure modes and their effect on operations. The risk priority number (RPN) is the classical method to evaluate the risk of failure in conventional FMEA. RPN, which ranges from 1 to 1000, is a mathematical product of three parameters—severity ($$S$$), occurrence ($$O$$), and detection ($$D$$)—to rank and assess the risk of potential failure modes. However, there are some shortcomings of the conventional RPN method, such as: the RPN elements have many duplicate numbers; violate the assumption of measurement scales; and have not considered the weight of $$S, O$$, and $$D$$. In order to improve the aforementioned shortcomings of the conventional RPN calculation problem, this paper presents an easy yet effective method to enhance the risk evaluation capability of FMEA. The new method is named exponential risk priority number (ERPN), which uses a simple addition function to the exponential form of $$S, O$$, and $$D$$ to substitute the conventional RPN method, which is a mathematical product of three parameters. Two practical cases are used to demonstrate that the ERPN method can not only resolve some problems of the conventional RPN method but also is able to provide a more accurate and reasonable risk assessment in FMEA.

[1]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique , 2009, Soft Comput..

[2]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  Mini–max regret strategy for robust capacity expansion decisions in semiconductor manufacturing , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[3]  T. Ruxton,et al.  Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables , 1995 .

[4]  Hu Xin Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Loudspeaker , 2005 .

[5]  Cemalettin Kubat,et al.  A hybrid intelligent approach for supply chain management system , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[6]  Björn Karlsson,et al.  A dynamic safety system based on sensor fusion , 2000, J. Intell. Manuf..

[7]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Chee Peng Lim,et al.  Application of Fuzzy Inference Techniques to FMEA , 2004, WSC.

[9]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of loss in revenue generation in demand-driven production , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[10]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method , 2011, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Mitigating the risk of information leakage in a two-level supply chain through optimal supplier selection , 2011, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[12]  Abdul Raouf,et al.  A revised failure mode and effects analysis model , 1996 .

[13]  S. M. Seyed Hosseini,et al.  Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA , 2010, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[15]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  The new SAE FMECA standard , 1998, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity.

[16]  A. Gabus,et al.  Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility , 1973 .

[17]  Nune Ravi Sankar,et al.  Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Chiu-Chi Wei,et al.  FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS USING FUZZY METHOD AND GREY THEORY , 1999 .

[19]  Ruey Huei Yeh,et al.  FUZZY ASSESSMENT OF FMEA FOR A SEWAGE PLANT , 2007 .

[20]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[21]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Warren Gilchrist,et al.  Modelling Failure Modes and Effects Analysis , 1993 .

[23]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Kuei-Hu Chang,et al.  Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology , 2009, Microelectron. Reliab..

[25]  Dong‐Shang Chang,et al.  Applying DEA to enhance assessment capability of FMEA , 2009 .

[26]  Chan-Nan Lu,et al.  Risk Informed Design Refinement of a Power System Protection Scheme , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[27]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A novel general approach to evaluating the PCBA for components with different membership function , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[29]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[31]  J. B. Bowles,et al.  Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 1995 .

[32]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[33]  John Bowles,et al.  An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..