Automatic, Format-independent Generation of Metadata for Documents Based on Semantically Enriched Context Information

The purpose of this study was to investigate how metadata can be generated automatically for all types of documents used in an enterprise, regardless of their content. Because of the increasing number of non-textual documents, i.e. images, audio and video files, full-text indexing is not applicable and thus, the use of metadata has become more and more important for resource description and discovery. However, creating metadata manually is time consuming and error prone and moreover barely feasible for the huge amount of documents an enterprise deals with daily. Thus, an approach for automatic, format-independent metadata generation is required. To begin the documents’ context was analysed. A document is considered an enterprise object, which is related to other enterprise objects such as a task the document is used in and the purpose it is created for. It was recognised that context of a document can be described formally and semantically enriched in an enterprise architecture. This enterprise architecture description can then be used for automatic metadata generation. To use the enterprise architecture description in a productive environment it was determined how its objects can be linked to enterprise components, e.g. information stored in a relational database. Finally a procedure for setting-up, conducting and utilizing the metadata generation approach in an enterprise was identified. The combination of these objectives has been called mintApproach. With the mintApproach system the huge annual economic loss due to the vast time wasted on information retrieval is addressed. Research design followed the deductive approach and a mixed method strategy was employed, combining the four methods: results of a Representative Study provided a comprehensive source for the analysis of the use of document creation tools in enterprises and preferred search strategies. Qualitative interviews conducted in a survey and based on a structured questionnaire provided insights on document handling in enterprise. Action Research and prototyping was applied in two different types of organisations, a non-profit organisation (NPO) in the domain of sexual health and a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME), developing contract management software. Evolutionary 'prototyping' built an integrated part of the Action Research studies and led to the development of an executable prototype. Applying Action Research in two enterprises, with very different business and business goals, helped to avoid the common pitfalls of this method like subjectivity, lack of generality and replication. The results of the survey and the Action Research studies endorsed the fact that for document management in enterprises and public administrations alike, a document’s context is considered. Although relations between documents and other enterprise objects may be hidden, low level governance instruments like guidelines for file storage help to reveal these relations. For example relations to other enterprise objects like a product or a client are implicit in the file structure in which a document is stored. Determining the naming conventions for files is another way of implicitly stating relations between enterprise objects and documents. This explicit information is represented in a semantically enriched Enterprise Architecture description. It was found that the well-known standard for Enterprise Architecture modelling, ArchiMate, was well suited for providing the basis for core enterprise ontology. ArchiMate was refined, enhanced, and represented in RDFS-Plus, an ontology language which is machine executable but also cognitively adequate for humans. This core ontology was enhanced by application of specific ontologies reflecting enterprise specific needs, for example for representing domain knowledge or improving contract lifecycle management. The enter rise ontology was considered a part of an enterprise repository, comprising all enterprise objects constituting an organisation despite their representation. Thus, for automatic, format-independent metadata generation based on context, ontology-to-database-mapping was considered suitable (why not was used?) The approach was evaluated based on an executable prototype that illustrates the scientific models and makes it easier for the evaluators to assess the underlying scientific concepts. Goal of the evaluation was to determine the appropriateness, capability and applicability of the mintApproach. The mintApproach, visualized in the MeGaWorkbench prototype, was assessed as appropriate for automatic format-independent metadata generation for business documents. Using context for metadata generation was considered promising, particularly regarding multi-media documents, respectively documents with little, meaningless or even wrong document attributes. The mintApproach was considered beneficial as it helps to meet business needs in handling the ever-increasing amount of unstructured information by reducing the amount of personnel time involved.

[1]  Mauri Leppänen,et al.  Towards an Ontology for Information Systems Development , 2006, EMMSAD.

[2]  Ccsds Secretariat,et al.  Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) , 1999 .

[3]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Fund Finder: A case study of database-to-ontology mapping , 2003 .

[4]  Michael Uschold,et al.  The Enterprise Ontology , 1998, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[5]  Thomas Keller,et al.  Business Process Management 2011 - Status quo und Zukunft : Eine empirische Studie im deutschsprachigen Europa , 2011 .

[6]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Overcoming Information Overload in the Enterprise: The Active Approach , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[7]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Understanding Context Before Using It , 2005, CONTEXT.

[8]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering , 1997, AAAI 1997.

[9]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages , 2000, EKAW.

[10]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Contextual Reasoning , 1998, ECAI.

[11]  Gerald Reif,et al.  A comparison of RDB-to-RDF mapping languages , 2011, I-Semantics '11.

[12]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Towards Regulatory Compliance: Extracting Rights and Obligations to Align Requirements with Regulations , 2006, 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06).

[13]  Satoshi Sekine,et al.  A survey of named entity recognition and classification , 2007 .

[14]  Erik Duval,et al.  Frameworks for the Automatic Indexation of Learning Management Systems Content into Learning Object Repositories , 2005 .

[15]  Donald Chapin,et al.  Semantics of Business Vocabulary & Business Rules (SBVR) , 2005, Rule Languages for Interoperability.

[16]  Sebastian Rudolph,et al.  Orel: Database-Driven Reasoning for OWL 2 Profiles , 2010, Description Logics.

[17]  Klaus Meißner,et al.  Metadata generation and consolidation within an ontology-based document management system , 2008, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[18]  Ángel García-Crespo,et al.  Using SPIN to Formalise Accounting Regulations on the Semantic Web , 2012 .

[19]  Bo Hu,et al.  Refining Process Models through the Analysis of Informal Work Practice , 2011, BPM.

[20]  Adam Souzis,et al.  Semantic Annotations For Wsdl And Xml Schema , 2015 .

[21]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontologien , 2001, Wirtschaftsinf..

[22]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Characterizing Knowledge Maturing , 2006 .

[23]  The Zachman Framework For Enterprise Architecture and Rational Best Practices and Products , 2001 .

[24]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended-REA enterprise information architecture , 2002, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Gordon W. Paynter,et al.  Orchestrating metadata enhancement services: introducing Lenny , 2005, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[26]  Oddmn Pauline Ohren An Ontological Approach to Characterising Enterprise Architecture Frameworks , 2004, ICEIMT/DIISM.

[27]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontobroker: The Very High Idea , 1998, FLAIRS.

[28]  Tom Mens,et al.  Ontology Evolution , 2008, Ontology Management.

[29]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  From information to knowledge: harvesting entities and relationships from web sources , 2010, PODS '10.

[30]  Alois Ferscha,et al.  Modeling Context-Aware Behavior by Interpreted ECA Rules , 2003, Euro-Par.

[31]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  Information Systems: Foundation of E-Business , 2002 .

[32]  Boris Motik,et al.  Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[33]  Fabrice Kordon,et al.  An Overview of Rapid System Prototyping Today , 2003, Des. Autom. Embed. Syst..

[34]  Stefan Cronholm,et al.  Conceptualising Participatory Action Research - Three Different Practices , 2004 .

[35]  Athanasios Manitsaris,et al.  Automatic metadata generation by utilising pre-existing metadata of related resources , 2008, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[36]  Christian Bizer,et al.  D2R Server - Publishing Relational Databases on the Semantic Web , 2004 .

[37]  Klaus Tochtermann,et al.  MISTRAL - measurable, intelligent and reliable semantic extraction and retrieval of multimedia data , 2005 .

[38]  Hércules Antonio do Prado,et al.  Emerging Technologies of Text Mining: Techniques and Applications , 2007 .

[39]  S. Hartmann,et al.  Models in Science , 2006 .

[40]  Xian Yi Cheng,et al.  The Study of Ontology Reasoning to Semantic Web , 2011 .

[41]  R. Guha Contexts: a formalization and some applications , 1992 .

[42]  Stefan Schulz Kontext als Beziehung: Ein Kontextmodell für Mobiles Wissensmanagement , 2003, GI Jahrestagung.

[43]  Axel van Lamsweerde,et al.  Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications , 2009 .

[44]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  On Ontologies And Enterprise Modelling , 2002 .

[45]  Xiaomeng Su,et al.  A Comparative Study of Ontology Languages and Tools , 2002, CAiSE.

[46]  S. A. M. Rizvi,et al.  Semantic Annotation Framework For Intelligent Information Retrieval Using KIM Architecture , 2010 .

[47]  Amjad Umar,et al.  Enterprise Ontologies for Planning and Integration of Business: A Pragmatic Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  Hanifa Shah,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Frameworks , 2007 .

[49]  William A. Woods,et al.  What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1975 .

[50]  Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Concepts for Modelling Enterprise Architectures , 2003 .

[51]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[52]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[53]  Horacio Saggion Mining Profiles and Definitions with Natural Language Processing , 2008 .

[54]  A. Antón,et al.  A Systematic Method for Acquiring Regulatory Requirements : A Frame-Based Approach , 2007 .

[55]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure , 1995, CACM.

[56]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[57]  Maureen Whalen,et al.  Introduction to Metadata , 2008 .

[58]  Rodrigo F. Carvalho,et al.  Metadata goes where Metadata is : contextual networks in the photographic domain , 2008 .

[59]  James D. Anderson,et al.  The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval - Part I: Research, and the nature of human indexing , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[60]  G. Sayeed Choudhury,et al.  Toward a Metadata Generation Framework: A Case Study at Johns Hopkins University , 2004, D Lib Mag..

[61]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[62]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  ArchiMate and DEMO - Mates to Date? , 2009, CIAO! / EOMAS.

[63]  Pericles A. Mitkas,et al.  An integrated framework for enhancing the semantic transformation, editing and querying of relational databases , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  Jaap Schekkerman,et al.  How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Framework: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework , 2003 .

[65]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[66]  Martin Hepp,et al.  An Ontology Framework for Semantic Business Process Management , 2007, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[67]  Jane Hunter,et al.  The ABC Ontology and Model , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[68]  Boris Motik,et al.  A Comparison of Reasoning Techniques for Querying Large Description Logic ABoxes , 2006, LPAR.

[69]  Marek Hatala,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM FOR COMPUTER-AIDED METADATA GENERATION , 2003 .

[70]  Zhuozhi Chen,et al.  Rediscovering Zachman Framework Using Ontology from a Requirement Engineering Perspective , 2009, 2009 33rd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[71]  C. Parker,et al.  Processes and impacts of knowledge creation in email , 2003 .

[72]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Personal information management: From information consumption to curation , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[73]  Mauri Leppänen,et al.  A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology , 2007, BIS.

[74]  Jeongsoo Lee,et al.  An ontology-based Enterprise Architecture , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[75]  Witold Abramowicz,et al.  Semantically enhanced Business Process Modelling Notation , 2007, SBPM.

[76]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[77]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[78]  Robert Woitsch,et al.  Business and IT alignment: the IT-Socket , 2009, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[79]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts , 1994, IEEE Network.

[80]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State of the art and challenges , 2006, TOMCCAP.

[81]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications , 2008 .

[82]  Inge Hanschke Strategic IT Management - A Toolkit for Enterprise Architecture Management , 2009 .

[83]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Towards a Method to Conceptualize Domain Ontologies , 1996 .

[84]  Sang-goo Lee,et al.  Building an operational product ontology system , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[85]  Ygor Couto Cardoso Creation and extension of ontologies for describing communications in the context of organizations , 2010 .

[86]  Qiang Wang,et al.  REA-based Enterprise Business Domain Ontology Construction , 2010, J. Softw..

[87]  Wendy G. Lehnert,et al.  Information extraction , 1996, CACM.

[88]  Badawia M. Albassuny Automatic metadata generation applications: a survey study , 2008, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[89]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Ontology-based metadata generation from semi-structured information , 2001, K-CAP '01.

[90]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems , 1998 .

[91]  Marcelo Arenas,et al.  On the Semantics of SPARQL , 2009, Semantic Web Information Management.

[92]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[93]  Craig A. N. Soules,et al.  Connections: using context to enhance file search , 2005, SOSP '05.

[94]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in the Integrated Enterprise - Interoperability Strategies for the Enterprise Architect, 2004 International Conference on Enterprise Integration and Modelling Technology, ICEIMT 2004, The 7th International Conference on Design of Information Infrastructure Systems for Manufacturing , 2005, ICEIMT/DIISM.

[95]  Barbara Thönssen,et al.  Semantically Enriched Obligation Management - An Approach for Improving the Handling of Obligations Represented in Contracts , 2012, KMIS.

[96]  Sunita Sarawagi,et al.  Information Extraction , 2008 .

[97]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Enterprise ontologies: Review and an activity theory approach , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  NERD: evaluating named entity recognition tools in the web of data , 2011 .

[99]  J.M. Ares Casal,et al.  Formalising the software evaluation process , 1998, Proceedings SCCC'98. 18th International Conference of the Chilean Society of Computer Science (Cat. No.98EX212).

[100]  Jean Bézivin,et al.  In Search of a Basic Principle for Model Driven Engineering , 2004 .

[101]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Governance in the information age: a research framework for an uncertain future , 2008, DG.O.

[102]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The MASTRO system for ontology-based data access , 2011, Semantic Web.

[103]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Soft design science methodology , 2009, DESRIST.

[104]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  DAML-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services , 2001, SWWS.

[105]  Alexander Grigorov,et al.  Milestone M5.8 KRSM first cycle prototype evaluation plan , 2007 .

[106]  Alfonso Fuggetta,et al.  Open source software - an evaluation , 2003, J. Syst. Softw..

[107]  Martin L. King,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies , 1995 .

[108]  Martin Jonsson,et al.  Sensing and Making Sense : Designing Middleware for Context Aware Computing , 2007 .

[109]  SWAD-Europe Deliverable 10.2: Mapping Semantic Web Data with RDBMSes , 2004 .

[110]  Carsten Lutz,et al.  The Combined Approach to Query Answering in DL-Lite , 2010, KR.

[111]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  Enterprise Meta Modeling Methods - Combining a Stakeholder-Oriented and a Causality-Based Approach , 2009, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[112]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  An eBusiness Model Ontology for Modeling eBusiness , 2002, Bled eConference.

[113]  Corey Harper Dublin Core Metadata Initiative: Beyond the Element Set , 2010 .

[114]  Euiho Suh,et al.  Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[115]  Mohamed Ben Ahmed,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Context Sensitive Systems Development , 2007, CONTEXT.

[116]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[117]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web , 2004, Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing.

[118]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Comparison of Upper Ontologies (Technical Report DISI-TR-06-21) , 2006 .

[119]  Diane Hillmann,et al.  Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination , 2004, Dublin Core Conference.

[120]  Moritz Weiten,et al.  Ontology Management Infrastructures , 2008, Ontology Management.

[121]  A. Crisafulli Enabling Knowledge Sharing and Reuse on the Semantic Web , 2003 .

[122]  Knut Hinkelmann,et al.  Ontologies for E-government , 2010 .

[123]  Hyoil Han,et al.  Survey of semantic annotation platforms , 2005, SAC '05.

[124]  Dimitris Karagiannis,et al.  BPMS: business process management systems , 1995, SIGO.

[125]  Elizabeth D. Liddy,et al.  Automatic metadata generation & evaluation , 2002, SIGIR '02.

[126]  John McCarthy,et al.  Notes on Formalizing Context , 1993, IJCAI.

[127]  Claudio Gutiérrez,et al.  The Expressive Power of SPARQL , 2008, SEMWEB.

[128]  William E. McCarthy,et al.  The Ontological Foundation of REA Enterprise Information Systems , 2000 .

[129]  Boris Motik,et al.  Managing multiple and distributed ontologies on the Semantic Web , 2003, The VLDB Journal.

[130]  Peter Brown,et al.  Triggering information by context , 1998, Personal Technologies.

[131]  Geert Poels,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Tweekerkenstraat 2 B-9000 Gent Ontology-driven Business Modelling: Improving the Conceptual Representation of the Rea Ontology Ontology-driven Business Modelling: Improving the Conceptual Representation of the Rea Ontology , 2022 .

[132]  Mauri Leppänen,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Descriptions for Enhancing Local Government Transformation and Coherency Management: Case Study , 2011, 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.

[133]  Carl Lagoze,et al.  The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting Protocol , 2002 .

[134]  Sarah Currier Metadata for Learning Resources: An Update on Standards Activity for 2008 , 2008 .

[135]  Georgios Meditskos,et al.  DLEJena: A practical forward-chaining OWL 2 RL reasoner combining Jena and Pellet , 2010, J. Web Semant..

[136]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[137]  D. Lenat The Dimensions of Context-Space , 1998 .

[138]  Nicola Zannone,et al.  Why Eliciting and Managing Legal Requirements Is Hard , 2008, 2008 Requirements Engineering and Law.

[139]  Karen Coyle,et al.  Guidelines for Dublin Core application profiles , 2009 .

[140]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Automating the Extraction of Rights and Obligations for Regulatory Compliance , 2008, ER.

[141]  Zakaria Maamar,et al.  What can context do for web services? , 2006, CACM.

[142]  Viviana Mascardi,et al.  A Comparison of Upper Ontologies , 2007, WOA.

[143]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[144]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Enterprise ontology in enterprise engineering , 2008, SAC '08.

[145]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  An organisation ontology for enterprise modeling: preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour , 1996 .

[146]  Yves Peirsman,et al.  The Construction and Evaluation of Word Space Models , 2008, LREC.

[147]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Strategies for the Evaluation of Ontology Learning , 2008, Ontology Learning and Population.

[148]  M. Fox,et al.  An Organization Ontology for Enterprise Modelling , 2002 .

[149]  Harry Chen,et al.  An ontology for context-aware pervasive computing environments , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[150]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  A mixture model for contextual text mining , 2006, KDD '06.

[151]  Sang-goo Lee,et al.  A comparison of ontology reasoning systems using query sequences , 2008, ICUIMC '08.

[152]  Jason Charvat,et al.  Project ManagementMethodologies Selecting, Implementing, and Supporting Methodologies and Processes for Projects , 2003 .

[153]  Nadine Cullot,et al.  Database-to-Ontology Mapping Generation for Semantic Interoperability , 2007 .

[154]  Boris Motik,et al.  OWL 2: The next step for OWL , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[155]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Final Report for the AMeGA (Automatic Metadata Generation Applications) Project , 2005 .

[156]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Knowledge Representation and Reasoning , 2004 .

[157]  Souripriya Das,et al.  Database Technologies for RDF , 2009, Reasoning Web.

[158]  David Chen,et al.  Enterprise Integration and Networking: Issues, Trends and Vision , 2004, ICEIMT/DIISM.

[159]  M. Lankhorst Enterprise Architecture at Work , 2013 .

[160]  Mark von Rosing,et al.  Business Process Model and Notation - BPMN , 2015, The Complete Business Process Handbook, Vol. I.

[161]  Giovanni Sartor,et al.  Proceedings of the V Legislative XML Workshop , 2007 .

[162]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Unveiling the hidden bride: deep annotation for mapping and migrating legacy data to the Semantic Web , 2004, J. Web Semant..

[163]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[164]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[165]  Barbara Thönssen,et al.  A broader view on Context Models to support Business Process Agility. , 2010 .

[166]  Daniel S. Weld,et al.  Autonomously semantifying wikipedia , 2007, CIKM '07.

[167]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Functionalities for automatic metadata generation applications: a survey of metadata experts' opinions , 2006, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[168]  Elke Donalies,et al.  Die Wortbildung des Deutschen : ein Überblick , 2002 .

[169]  S. Debowski Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[170]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Introduction to Information Extraction Technology , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[171]  James R. Sanders,et al.  Handbuch der Evaluationsstandards: die Standards des "Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation" , 1999 .

[172]  Beryl Graham,et al.  Digital Media , 2003 .

[173]  James A. Landay,et al.  An Infrastructure Approach to Context-Aware Computing , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[174]  Siew Hooi Tan,et al.  Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 2012 .

[175]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  Text Processing with GATE , 2011 .

[176]  Hans Tompits,et al.  Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies , 2006, Reasoning Web.

[177]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Theories and uses of context in knowledge representation and reasoning , 2003 .

[178]  Panos Vassiliadis A Survey of Extract-Transform-Load Technology , 2009, Int. J. Data Warehous. Min..

[179]  Karlis Cerans,et al.  RDB2OWL: a practical approach for transforming RDB data into RDF/OWL , 2010, I-SEMANTICS '10.

[180]  Emanuela Merelli,et al.  The Role of Content and Context in Enterprise Repositories , 2010, BPM 2010.

[181]  Philipp Cimiano,et al.  Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Ontology Learning and Population: Bridging the Gap between Text and Knowledge , 2008 .

[182]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  A case for automated large-scale semantic annotation , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[183]  Mark Burnett,et al.  Activities, context and ubiquitous computing , 2002, Comput. Commun..

[184]  J. Current,et al.  Theory and methodology , 1991 .

[185]  Jaap Gordijn,et al.  Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce ideas , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[186]  Simeon Warner Exposing and harvesting metadata using the OAI metadata harvesting protocol: A tutorial , 2001, ArXiv.

[187]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[188]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[189]  Monica Palmirani,et al.  Metadata for the legal domain , 2003, 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings..

[190]  Orri Erling,et al.  RDF Support in the Virtuoso DBMS , 2007, CSSW.

[191]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning , 2004, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[192]  Alexa T. McCray,et al.  Principles for digital library development , 2001, CACM.

[193]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Using SPARQL and SPIN for Data Quality Management on the Semantic Web , 2010, BIS.

[194]  Nikolas Mitrou,et al.  Bringing relational databases into the Semantic Web: A survey , 2012, Semantic Web.

[195]  Simon Fong,et al.  Evaluation of Semantic Web Services: Before and After Applying in Telecommunication , 2011 .

[196]  M. A. Hossain,et al.  Towards an Ontology for MPEG-7 Semantic Descriptions , 2006 .

[197]  Xia An-bang,et al.  Federal enterprise architecture framework , 2007 .

[198]  Nikolas Mitrou,et al.  VisAVis: An Approach to an Intermediate Layer between Ontologies and Relational Database Contents , 2006, WISM.

[199]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Informatik-Methoden für das Wissensmanagement , 1999 .

[200]  Robert Lagerström,et al.  Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams , 2007, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[201]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  The YAGO-NAGA approach to knowledge discovery , 2009, SGMD.

[202]  Yasser Abdel-Rady I. Mohamed,et al.  A Semantic Approach to Representation, Sharing, and Discovery of Construction Simulation Models , 2012 .

[203]  Pericles A. Mitkas,et al.  RDOTE - Transforming Relational Databases into Semantic Web Data , 2010, ISWC Posters&Demos.

[204]  Harald Holz,et al.  From Lightweight, Proactive Information Delivery to Business Process-Oriented Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[205]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  DCMI-Tools: Ontologies for Digital Application Description , 2007, ELPUB.

[206]  Dzulkifli Mohamad,et al.  Semantic gap in CBIR: automatic objects spatial relationships semantic extraction and representation , 2010 .

[207]  Andrew K. Miller,et al.  Ontology Query Languages for the Semantic Web: A Performance Evaluation , 2005 .

[208]  Li Ma,et al.  Explorations in the use of semantic web technologies for product information management , 2007, WWW '07.

[209]  Stefano Spaccapietra Journal on Data Semantics X , 2008, Journal on Data Semantics X.

[210]  Siegfried Handschuh,et al.  Semantic annotation for knowledge management: Requirements and a survey of the state of the art , 2006, J. Web Semant..

[211]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  Using a Multimedia Ontology Infrastructure for Semantic Annotation of Multimedia Content , 2005, SemAnnot@ISWC.

[212]  Adam Pease,et al.  The Suggested Upper Merged Ontology: A Large Ontology for the Semantic Web and its Applic ations , 2002 .

[213]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Engineering Methodology , 2009, Handbook on Ontologies.

[214]  François B. Vernadat,et al.  Technical, semantic and organizational issues of enterprise interoperability and networking , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[215]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[216]  S. Decker The Semantic Web-on the respective Roles of XML and RDF , 2000 .

[217]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[218]  Christian M. Stracke,et al.  The Benefits and Future of Standards: Metadata and Beyond , 2010, MTSR.

[219]  Thomas Eiter,et al.  Rules and Ontologies for the Semantic Web , 2008, Reasoning Web.

[220]  Tommaso Agnoloni,et al.  xmLegesEditor: an OpenSource Visual XML Editor for supporting Legal National Standards , 2007 .

[221]  Barbara Thönssen,et al.  Improving Supply-Chain-Management based on Semantically Enriched Risk Descriptions , 2012, KMIS.

[222]  Steffen Staab,et al.  On deep annotation , 2003, WWW '03.

[223]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Essentials In Ontology Engineering: Methodologies, Languages, And Tools , 2011 .

[224]  Ben Kröse,et al.  Care: context awareness in residences for elderly , 2008 .

[225]  Thomas Keays,et al.  Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist , 2008 .

[226]  Agata Filipowska,et al.  Business Functions Ontology and its Application in Semantic Business Process Modelling , 2008 .

[227]  Simon King,et al.  From context to content: leveraging context to infer media metadata , 2004, MULTIMEDIA '04.

[228]  J. Carroll,et al.  Jena: implementing the semantic web recommendations , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[229]  Panu Korpipää,et al.  Blackboard-based software framework and tool for mobile device context awareness , 2005 .

[230]  Uwe V. Riss,et al.  E-mail in Semantic Task Management , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing.

[231]  Zhuozhi Chen,et al.  Domain Modeling for Enterprise Information Systems - Formalizing and Extending Zachman Framework Using BWW Ontology , 2009, 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering.

[232]  Tao Gu,et al.  Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL , 2004, IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004. Proceedings of the Second.

[233]  P. Botella ISO / IEC 9126 in practice : what do we need to know ? , 2004 .

[234]  Andy Powell,et al.  DCMI Abstract Model , 2005 .

[235]  Peter G. B. Enser,et al.  Towards a Comprehensive Survey of the Semantic Gap in Visual Image Retrieval , 2003, CIVR.

[236]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Architectures for Context , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[237]  Jeff Heflin,et al.  SHOE: A Knowledge Representation Language for Internet Applications , 1999 .

[238]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[239]  Annett Mitschick Ontologiebasierte Indexierung und Kontextualisierung multimedialer Dokumente für das persönliche Wissensmanagement , 2009 .

[240]  Michele Missikoff,et al.  An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology: CEO , 2001 .

[241]  Dirk Matthes,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Kompendium , 2011 .

[242]  Erik Duval,et al.  Automating metadata generation: the simple indexing interface , 2005, WWW '05.

[243]  Barbara A. Kitchenham,et al.  The use and usefulness of the ISO/IEC 9126 quality standard , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005..

[244]  Satya S. Sahoo,et al.  A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF , 2009 .

[245]  Kurt Maly,et al.  Comparison of ontology reasoning systems using custom rules , 2011, WIMS '11.

[246]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  R2O, an extensible and semantically based database-to-ontology mapping language , 2004 .

[247]  Robert Winter,et al.  Language communities in enterprise architecture research , 2009, DESRIST.

[248]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Ontologies: How can They be Built? , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[249]  Mary S. Woodley Crosswalks, metadata harvesting, federated searching, metasearching: using metadata to connect users and information , 2008 .

[250]  Dominik Grimm,et al.  The Use of Business Process Management during the Implementation of Electronic Records Management Systems , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[251]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  Metadata Extraction and Harvesting , 2004 .

[252]  VE Church,et al.  An approach for assessing software prototypes , 1986, SOEN.

[253]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  Introduction to Information Extraction , 1999, AI Commun..

[254]  Henrik Eriksson The semantic-document approach to combining documents and ontologies , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[255]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Linking Data to Ontologies , 2008, J. Data Semant..

[256]  Emanuele Della Valle,et al.  Squiggle: a Semantic Search Engine for Indexing and Retrieval of Multimedia Content , 2006, SEMPS.

[257]  Selmin Nurcan,et al.  Towards Context Aware Business Process Modelling , 2007 .

[258]  Alexiei Dingli,et al.  Learning to Harvest Information for the Semantic Web , 2004, ESWS.

[259]  Wolf-Tilo Balke,et al.  Introduction to Information Extraction: Basic Notions and Current Trends , 2012, Datenbank-Spektrum.

[260]  Mary B. Ruvane Defining annotations: a visual (re)interpretation , 2006, ASIST.

[261]  Barbara Thönssen An Enterprise Ontology Building the Bases for Automatic Metadata Generation , 2010, MTSR.

[262]  Matthias Baldauf,et al.  A survey on context-aware systems , 2007, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput..

[263]  Steffen Staab,et al.  CREAM: creating relational metadata with a component-based, ontology-driven annotation framework , 2001, K-CAP '01.

[264]  Jan Mendling,et al.  Event-Driven-Process-Chain-Markup-Language (EPML): Anforderungen zur Definition eines XML-Schemas für Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten (EPK) , 2002, EPK.

[265]  J. Crawford,et al.  Setting the stage. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[266]  Amalia Beisler,et al.  Beyond Theory: Preparing Dublin Core Metadata for OAI-PMH Harvesting , 2009 .

[267]  Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,et al.  A Context Modeling Survey , 2004 .

[268]  Daniel L. Moody,et al.  Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[269]  Jie Tang,et al.  Information Extraction: Methodologies and Applications , 2008 .

[270]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  The Use of the Dublin Core in Web Annotation Programs , 2002, Dublin Core Conference.

[271]  Peter Bernus,et al.  GERAM: The Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology , 2003 .

[272]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS - Business Process Modeling , 1998 .

[273]  Douglas Campbell,et al.  Managing digital objects and their metadata: challenges and responses , 2004, Dublin Core Conference.

[274]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Ubiquitous computing - computing in context , 2003 .

[275]  Agata Filipowska,et al.  Organizational ontologies to support semantic business process management , 2009, SBPM '09.

[276]  W. R. Sharp,et al.  A Steering and Visualization Toolkit for Distributed Applications , 2006, PDPTA.