SHREC'10 Track: Protein Model Classification

This paper presents the results of the 3D Shape Retrieval Contest 2010 (SHREC'10) track Protein Models Classification. The aim of this track is to evaluate how well 3D shape recognition algorithms can classify protein structures according to the CATH [CSL?08] superfamily classification. Five groups participated in this track, using a total of six methods, and for each method a set of ranked predictions was submitted for each classification task. The evaluation of each method is based on the nearest neighbour and area under the curve(AUC) metrics.

[1]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  D. Ritchie,et al.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations , 2000, Proteins.

[3]  Naoto Morikawa,et al.  Discrete differential geometry of tetrahedrons and encoding of local protein structure , 2007, ArXiv.

[4]  Ian Sillitoe,et al.  The CATH classification revisited—architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Hans Burkhardt,et al.  Invariant features for searching in protein fold databases , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[6]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Rumen Andonov,et al.  Maximum Cliques in Protein Structure Comparison , 2009, SEA.

[8]  Lora Mak,et al.  An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[9]  Noël Malod-Dognin,et al.  Protein Structure Comparison: From Contact Map Overlap Maximisation to Distance-based Alignment Search Tool. (La comparaison structurale des protéines : de la maximisation du recouvrement de cartes de contacts à l'alignement basé sur les distances) , 2010 .

[10]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[11]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  W R Taylor,et al.  SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  Bin Li,et al.  Fast protein tertiary structure retrieval based on global surface shape similarity , 2008, Proteins.

[14]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Shape retrieval using 3D Zernike descriptors , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[15]  Rumen Andonov,et al.  An Efficient Lagrangian Relaxation for the Contact Map Overlap Problem , 2008, WABI.

[16]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Lipman,et al.  Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. , 1985, Science.

[18]  Jean-Claude Spehner,et al.  Fast and robust computation of molecular surfaces , 1995, SCG '95.

[19]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  Three-Dimensional Shape-Structure Comparison Method for Protein Classification , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[20]  C. Sander,et al.  Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[21]  Robert D. Carr,et al.  1001 Optimal PDB Structure Alignments: Integer Programming Methods for Finding the Maximum Contact Map Overlap , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[22]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithmic aspects of protein structure similarity , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[23]  Wei Xie,et al.  A Reduction-Based Exact Algorithm for the Contact Map Overlap Problem , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..

[24]  Hans Burkhardt,et al.  Invariant Features for 3D-Data based on Group Integration using Directional Information and Spherical Harmonic Expansion , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).