Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production

Bacterial contamination is an ongoing problem for commercial fuel ethanol production facilities. Both chronic and acute infections are of concern, due to the fact that bacteria compete with the ethanol-producing yeast for sugar substrates and micronutrients. Lactic acid levels often rise during bouts of contamination, suggesting that the most common contaminants are lactic acid bacteria. However, quantitative surveys of commercial corn-based fuel ethanol facilities are lacking. For this study, samples were collected from one wet mill and two dry grind fuel ethanol facilities over a 9 month period at strategic time points and locations along the production lines, and bacterial contaminants were isolated and identified. Contamination in the wet mill facility consistently reached 106 bacteria/ml. Titers from dry grind facilities were more variable but often reached 108/ml. Antibiotics were not used in the wet mill operation. One dry grind facility added antibiotic to the yeast propagation tank only, while the second facility dosed the fermentation with antibiotic every 4 h. Neither dosing procedure appeared to reliably reduce overall contamination, although the second facility showed less diversity among contaminants. Lactobacillus species were the most abundant isolates from all three plants, averaging 51, 38, and 77% of total isolates from the wet mill and the first and second dry grind facilities, respectively. Although populations varied over time, individual facilities tended to exhibit characteristic bacterial profiles, suggesting the occurrence of persistent endemic infections.

[1]  Lawrence A. Johnson,et al.  Wet Milling: The Basis for Corn Biorefineries , 2019, Corn.

[2]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Urea Hydrogen Peroxide Reduces the Numbers of Lactobacilli, Nourishes Yeast, and Leaves No Residues in the Ethanol Fermentation , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[3]  I. Chang,et al.  Use of sulfite and hydrogen peroxide to control bacterial contamination in ethanol fermentation , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  P. Oliva-Neto,et al.  Effect of 3,4,4'-trichlorocarbanilide on growth of lactic acid bacteria contaminants in alcoholic fermentation , 1998 .

[5]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation , 2001, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[6]  W. Gibbons,et al.  Use of potassium meta bisulfite to control bacterial contaminants during fermentation of fodder beet cubes for fuel ethanol , 1986 .

[7]  D. Makanjuola,et al.  Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentations , 1992 .

[8]  M. Cotta,et al.  The U.S. corn ethanol industry: An overview of current technology and future prospects , 2002 .

[9]  Irving Marcus Fermentation Processes and Products: Problems in Patenting , 1979 .

[10]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Influence of Medium Buffering Capacity on Inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth by Acetic and Lactic Acids , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  S. A. Watson,et al.  Corn: chemistry and technology. , 1987 .

[12]  E. Aquarone Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. , 1960, Applied microbiology.

[13]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Effect of lactic acid bacteria on wheat mash fermentations prepared with laboratory backset , 1994 .

[14]  H. Blanch,et al.  By‐product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  Byung Hong Kim,et al.  Bacterial Contamination and Its Effects on Ethanol Fermentation , 1995 .

[16]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi‐continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[18]  P. Oliva-Neto,et al.  Evaluation of bacterial contamination in a fed-batch alcoholic fermentation process , 1994, World journal of microbiology & biotechnology.

[19]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Acetic Acid and Lactic Acid Inhibition of Growth of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae by Different Mechanisms , 2001 .

[20]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation , 1997, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[21]  Mike McCormack,et al.  U.S. Ethanol Industry Production Capacity Outlook: Update of 2001 Survey Results , 2002 .

[22]  S. R. Andrietta,et al.  Use of penicillin and monensin to control bacterial contamination of Brazilian alcohol fermentations , 2000 .

[23]  J. S. Hough,et al.  Microbiological Contamination in Breweries , 1982 .

[24]  T. P. Lyons,et al.  The alcohol textbook , 2003 .

[25]  F. Letourneau,et al.  Inhibition of beet molasses alcoholic fermentation by lactobacilli , 1990, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.