Reading Phylogenetic Trees: The Effects of Tree Orientation and Text Processing on Comprehension

Although differently formatted cladograms (hierarchical diagrams depicting evolutionary relationships among taxa) depict the same information, they may not be equally easy to comprehend. Undergraduate biology students attempted to translate cladograms from the diagonal to the rectangular format. The “backbone” line of each diagonal cladogram was slanted either up or down to the right. Eye movement analyses indicated that the students had a general bias to scan from left to right. Their scanning direction also depended on the orientation of the “backbone” line, resulting in upward or downward scanning, following the directional slant of the line. Because scanning down facilitates correct interpretation of the nested relationships, translation accuracy was higher for the down than for the up cladograms. Unfortunately, most diagonal cladograms in textbooks are in the upward orientation. This probably impairs students' success at tree thinking (i.e., interpreting and reasoning about evolutionary relationships depicted in cladograms), an important twenty-first century skill.

[1]  David Klahr,et al.  Structure and process in alphabetic retrieval. , 1983 .

[2]  D. A. Taylor,et al.  Representation of linear orders. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  I. Nachshon,et al.  Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[4]  C McGuinness,et al.  Problem representation: The effects of spatial arrays , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  R. O'HARA,et al.  Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology , 1988 .

[7]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Searching Imagined Environments , 1990 .

[8]  B. Tversky,et al.  Searching imagined environments. , 1990 .

[9]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  B Tversky,et al.  Descriptions and depictions of environments , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[11]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[12]  Priti Shah,et al.  A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension , 1998 .

[13]  Jeffery. M. Zacks,et al.  Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[14]  R. Morse,et al.  The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. Crops in 2000. , 2001 .

[15]  W. Hennig Phylogenetic Systematics , 2002 .

[16]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Task and Graphical Representation on Response Latency in a Graph Reading Task , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Christof Körner,et al.  Sequential processing in comprehension of hierarchical graphs , 2004 .

[18]  Sam S Donovan,et al.  The Tree-Thinking Challenge , 2005, Science.

[19]  Kefyn M. Catley,et al.  Darwin's missing link—a novel paradigm for evolution education , 2006 .

[20]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Understanding phylogenies in biology: the influence of a Gestalt Perceptual Principle. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Evolutionary Trees , 2008, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[22]  Melissa J. Green,et al.  Visual processing of social context during mental state perception in schizophrenia. , 2008, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[23]  E. Wiebe,et al.  The Interpretation of Cellular Transport Graphics by Students with Low and High Prior Knowledge , 2008 .

[24]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Seeing the Wood for the Trees: An Analysis of Evolutionary Diagrams in Biology Textbooks , 2008 .

[25]  H. Lundhaug The Fruit of the Tree of Life , 2008 .

[26]  Jeremy Martin,et al.  Are node-based and stem-based clades equivalent? Insights from graph theory , 2010, PLoS currents.

[27]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Characters Are Key: The Effect of Synapomorphies on Cladogram Comprehension , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[28]  Sean M. Hurley,et al.  Solving problems using matrix, network, and hierarchy diagrams: The consequences of violating construction conventions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Orly Fuhrman,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  Mike Stieff,et al.  Identifying Representational Competence With Multi-Representational Displays , 2011 .

[32]  Sandra K. Abell,et al.  Exploring the Complexity of Tree Thinking Expertise in an Undergraduate Systematics Course. , 2011 .

[33]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Reasoning About Evolution’s Grand Patterns , 2013 .