A Survey of the Economics of Patent Systems and Procedures

The last several decades have seen increases in patenting activity worldwide, as well as growing issues related to patent quality. In response to these quality issues a recent patent literature has emerged, that investigates the behavior and incentives of patent examiners, applicants, and third parties. In this paper, we provide an overview of patent procedures, patent systems and a survey of the new economic literature on patent systems. Both theoretical and empirical papers are considered. Policy implications coming from this literature are presented.

[1]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[2]  Henry S. Farber,et al.  Mobility and Stability: The Dynamics of Job Change in Labor Markets , 1998 .

[3]  Bhaven N. Sampat,et al.  When Do Applicants Search for Prior Art? , 2010, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[4]  B. Humphreys,et al.  Do urban casinos affect nearby neighbourhoods? Evidence from Canada , 2018 .

[5]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  How Strong Are Weak Patents , 2008 .

[6]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[7]  James Bessen,et al.  The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes , 2012 .

[8]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[9]  Kaz Miyagiwa.  First-to-invent Versus First-to-file, Invention, and International Patent Law Harmonization , 2009 .

[10]  Ryan Lampe.  Strategic Citation , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[11]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of Us and European Patents , 2006 .

[12]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[13]  David P. Brown,et al.  Using Bayesian Imputation to Assess Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Performance Measures. , 2016, Health services research.

[14]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[15]  Peter Lee,et al.  The impact of resale on entry in second price auctions , 2013, Math. Soc. Sci..

[16]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  High Technology Entrepreneurs and the Patent System: Results of the 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey , 2009 .

[17]  Peter S. Menell,et al.  Notice Failure and Notice Externalities , 2012 .

[18]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Filing strategies and patent value , 2011 .

[19]  John R. Allison,et al.  On the Feasibility of Improving Patent Quality One Technology at a Time: The Case of Business Methods , 2005 .

[20]  Daniel K. N. Johnson,et al.  Forced Out of the Closet: The Impact of the American Inventors Protection Act on the Timing of Patent Disclosure , 2001 .

[21]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes , 2009 .

[22]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  The economics of the european patent system , 2007 .

[23]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Patent office in innovation policy: Nobody's perfect , 2011 .

[24]  R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents , 1998 .

[25]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .

[26]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .

[27]  W. A. Shewhart,et al.  Quality control , 1927 .

[28]  Alexander K. Koch,et al.  Objectives and Incentives at the European Patent Office: (Report commissioned by SUEPO, the Staff Union of the European Patent Office) , 2006 .

[29]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[30]  Katharine Rockett,et al.  Property Rights and Invention , 2010 .

[31]  E. Fama.  Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  F. Schuett.  Patent quality and incentives at the patent office , 2013 .

[33]  Carl Shapiro,et al.  Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting , 2000, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[34]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Examining Patent Examination , 2009 .

[35]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The vulnerability of patent value determinants , 2011 .

[36]  Dhanoos Sutthiphisal,et al.  Does it Matter Who Has the Right to Patent: First-to-Invent or First-to-File? Lessons from Canada , 2009 .

[37]  Junsen Zhang,et al.  Market Structure, Imperfect Tariff Pass-Through, and Household Welfare in Urban China * , 2016 .

[38]  Douglas Lichtman,et al.  Rethinking Prosecution History Estoppel , 2003 .

[39]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Exploring the Patent Explosion , 2004, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[40]  Cecil D. Quillen,et al.  Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Updated , 2006 .

[41]  James Bessen,et al.  The Patent Litigation Explosion , 2005 .

[42]  Cecil D. Quillen,et al.  Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office , 2001 .

[43]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[44]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 1997 .

[45]  D. Giles,et al.  A survival analysis of the approval of US patent applications , 2011 .

[46]  B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Cost Factor in Patent Systems , 2006 .

[47]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[48]  Eric Maskin,et al.  Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation , 2000 .

[49]  Florian Jell,et al.  Patent Pending – Why Faster Isn’t Always Better , 2010 .

[50]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Patent Policy and Costly Imitation , 1992 .

[51]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[53]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[54]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition , 2003, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[55]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[56]  Daniel K. N. Johnson,et al.  Time In Purgatory: Examining the Grant Lag for U.S. Patent Applications , 2004 .

[57]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of Us Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions , 2002 .

[58]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  What to do About Bad Patents , 2005 .

[59]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2008 .

[60]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Patent renewals and R&D incentives , 1998 .

[61]  Josh Lerner,et al.  Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[62]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Patenting Procedures and Filing Strategies at the EPO , 2007 .

[63]  Vidya Atal,et al.  Patent Quality and a Two-Tiered Patent System , 2013 .

[64]  Suzanne Scotchmer,et al.  On the Optimality of the Patent Renewal System , 1999 .

[65]  V. Denicoló.  The optimal life of a patent when the timing of innovation is stochastic , 1999 .

[66]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Recent Research on the Economics of Patents , 2012 .

[67]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Nordhaus' Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation , 1972 .

[68]  Haiyang Zhang,et al.  What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting in China , 2010 .

[69]  Claude Crampes,et al.  Litigation and Settlement in Patent Infringement Cases , 2002 .

[70]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[71]  P. Klemperer.  How Broad Should the Scope of Patent Protection Be , 1990 .

[72]  Syr Hui,et al.  US Patent Application , 2013 .

[73]  Katharine Rockett,et al.  Innovation Cycles and Learning at the Patent Office: Does the Early Patent Get the Delay? , 2010 .

[74]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[75]  The Patent Quality Control Process: Can We Afford An (Rationally) Ignorant Patent Office? , 2008 .

[76]  Mark A. Lemley.  Ignoring Patents , 2007 .

[77]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .

[78]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  THE ROLE OF FEES IN PATENT SYSTEMS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2013 .

[79]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Post-Grant Reviews in the U.S. Patent System - Design Choices and Expected Impact , 2004 .

[80]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?* , 2004, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[81]  Gaétan de Rassenfosse,et al.  On the Price Elasticity of Demand for Patents , 2012 .

[82]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Patents and patent policy , 2007 .

[83]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[84]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes , 2009, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[85]  Ignatius J. Horstmann,et al.  Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: To Patent or (Maybe) Not to Patent , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[86]  Dominique Guellec,et al.  Claiming More: The Increased Voluminosity of Patent Applications and its Determinants , 2006 .

[87]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  When Small is Beautiful: Measuring the Evolution and Consequences of the Voluminosity of Patent Applications at the Epo , 2006, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[88]  Talia Bar,et al.  Prior Art: To Search or Not to Search , 2009 .

[89]  B. Humphreys,et al.  Urban casinos and local housing markets: evidence from the US. , 2014 .

[90]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  Novelty and Disclosure in Patent Law , 1990 .

[91]  Corinne Langinier.  Using Patents to Mislead Rivals , 2005 .

[92]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[93]  Panu Poutvaara,et al.  Citizens Should Vote on Secession , 2004 .

[94]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Post-Issue Patent , 2002 .

[95]  Kaz Miyagiwa.  First-to-Invent Versus First-to-File: International Patent Law Harmonization and Innovation , 2007 .

[96]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Patent Quality and Settlement among Repeat Patent Litigants , 2010 .

[97]  Vincenzo Denicolò,et al.  Patent races and optimal patent breadth and length , 1996 .

[98]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[99]  Alfons Palangkaraya,et al.  Applicant behaviour in patent examination request lags , 2008 .

[100]  Y. Nakata,et al.  A survival analysis of patent examination requests by Japanese electrical and electronic manufacturers , 2012 .

[101]  James Bessen,et al.  medium provided this notice is preserved. AN EMPIRICAL LOOK AT SOFTWARE PATENTS , 2004 .

[102]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[103]  Philippe Marcoul,et al.  Subjective Performance of Patent Examiners and Implicit Contracts , 2012 .

[104]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The quality factor in patent systems , 2011 .

[105]  Rashid Nikzad.  Survival Analysis of Patents in Canada , 2011 .

[106]  Haifang Huang,et al.  Effects of Exchange Rates on Employment in Canada , 2014 .

[107]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  An Economic Theory of Technological Change , 1969 .

[108]  C. Schneider,et al.  The Determinants of Patent Applications Outcomes - Does Experience Matter? , 2007 .

[109]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? , 2008 .

[110]  M. Rothschild,et al.  The Economics of Patents , 2002 .

[111]  Inventors and Impostors: an Economic Analysis of Patent Examination , 2009 .

[112]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  A Policy Insight into the R&D-Patent Relationship , 2007 .

[113]  Megan J. MacGarvie,et al.  The Private Value of Software Patents , 2006 .

[114]  Jerry R. Green,et al.  On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation , 1995 .

[115]  G. Moschini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: An Overview , 2002 .

[116]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform , 1999 .

[117]  R. Topel,et al.  Job Mobility and the Careers of Young Men , 1988 .

[118]  Philippe Marcoul,et al.  Search of Prior Art and Revelation of Information by Patent Applicants , 2008 .

[119]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Stylised Fact of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership , 1997 .

[120]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck.  Filing strategies and the increasing duration of patent applications , 2009 .

[121]  J. Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Literature , 2004 .

[122]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[123]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law , 1991 .

[124]  J. Choi.  Patent Litigation as an Information Transmission Mechanism , 1998 .

[125]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Optimal Patent Length and Breadth , 1990 .

[126]  J. H. Cole.  Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk , 2009 .