A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering.

Homologous proteins occurring through gene duplication may give rise to novel functions through mutations affecting protein sequence or expression. Comparison of such homologues allows insight into how morphological traits evolve. However, it is often unclear which changes are key to determining new functions. To address these ideas, we have studied a system where two homologues have evolved clear and opposite functions in controlling a major developmental switch. In plants, flowering is a major developmental transition that is critical to reproductive success. Arabidopsis phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein homologues TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) are key controllers of flowering, determining when and where flowers are made, but as opposing functions: TFL1 is a repressor, FT is an activator. We have uncovered a striking molecular basis for how these homologous proteins have diverged. Although <60% identical, we have shown that swapping a single amino acid is sufficient to convert TFL1 to FT function and vice versa. Therefore, these key residues may have strongly contributed to the selection of these important functions over plant evolution. Further, our results suggest that TFL1 and FT are highly conserved in biochemical function and that they act as repressors or activators of flowering through discrimination of structurally related interactors by a single residue.

[1]  Jeroen Raes,et al.  Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[2]  Shelley Hepworth,et al.  CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis , 2004, Development.

[3]  C. Dean,et al.  Multiple Pathways in the Decision to Flower: Enabling, Promoting, and Resetting , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[4]  J. Gergen,et al.  Ftz modulates Runt-dependent activation and repression of segment-polarity gene transcription , 2004, Development.

[5]  R. Macknight,et al.  It's time to flower: the genetic control of flowering time , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  M. Jacquet,et al.  Tfs1p, a Member of the PEBP Family, Inhibits the Ira2p but Not the Ira1p Ras GTPase-Activating Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Eukaryotic Cell.

[7]  D. Weigel,et al.  Acceleration of flowering by overexpression of MFT (MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1). , 2004, Molecules and cells.

[8]  Pamela S Soltis,et al.  Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Yong Li,et al.  An Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA mutagenized population (GABI-Kat) for flanking sequence tag-based reverse genetics , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[10]  R. Hellens,et al.  pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation , 2000, Plant Molecular Biology.

[11]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Protein kinase C switches the Raf kinase inhibitor from Raf-1 to GRK-2 , 2003, Nature.

[12]  C. Rameau,et al.  DETERMINATE and LATE FLOWERING Are Two TERMINAL FLOWER1/CENTRORADIALIS Homologs That Control Two Distinct Phases of Flowering Initiation and Development in Pea Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.015701. , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[13]  E. Dubois,et al.  Role of MADS box proteins and their cofactors in combinatorial control of gene expression and cell development. , 2003, Gene.

[14]  Jeroen Raes,et al.  And then there were many: MADS goes genomic. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[15]  M. Rubin,et al.  Effects of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Expression on Suppression of Prostate Cancer Metastasis , 2003 .

[16]  Takashi Araki,et al.  Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. , 2002, Plant & cell physiology.

[17]  John B. Anderson,et al.  MMDB: Entrez's 3D-structure database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  N. Adir,et al.  Tomato SP-Interacting Proteins Define a Conserved Signaling System That Regulates Shoot Architecture and Flowering Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.010293. , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[19]  W. Kolch,et al.  Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Interacts with NF-κB-Inducing Kinase and TAK1 and Inhibits NF-κB Activation , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[20]  T. Kroslak,et al.  Human Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding Protein Facilitates Heterotrimeric G Protein-dependent Signaling* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  P. Huijser,et al.  The delayed terminal flower phenotype is caused by a conditional mutation in the CENTRORADIALIS gene of snapdragon. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[22]  D. Weigel,et al.  Functional divergence of the TFL1‐like gene family in Arabidopsis revealed by characterization of a novel homologue , 2001, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[23]  H. Albrecht,et al.  The Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding Protein Is the Prototype of a Novel Family of Serine Protease Inhibitors* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  M. Lynch,et al.  The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. , 2000, Science.

[25]  M. Banfield,et al.  The structure of Antirrhinum centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Y. Kobayashi,et al.  A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. , 1999, Science.

[27]  J. Chory,et al.  Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. , 1999, Science.

[28]  W. Kolch,et al.  Suppression of Raf-1 kinase activity and MAP kinase signalling by RKIP , 1999, Nature.

[29]  S. Clough,et al.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[30]  M. Banfield,et al.  Function from structure? The crystal structure of human phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein suggests a role in membrane signal transduction. , 1998, Structure.

[31]  F. Schoentgen,et al.  Crystal structure of the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein from bovine brain: a novel structural class of phospholipid-binding proteins. , 1998, Structure.

[32]  M. Ganal,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. , 1998, Development.

[33]  I Amaya,et al.  A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. , 1998, Development.

[34]  J. Winther,et al.  A high-affinity inhibitor of yeast carboxypeptidase Y is encoded by TFS1 and shows homology to a family of lipid binding proteins. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[35]  Y. Ogura,et al.  Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1 , 1997, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[36]  E. Coen,et al.  Inflorescence Commitment and Architecture in Arabidopsis , 1997, Science.

[37]  Steven Rothstein,et al.  Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum , 1996, Nature.

[38]  K. Ojika,et al.  Sequence homology of rat and human HCNP precursor proteins, bovine phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein and rat 23-kDa protein associated with the opioid-binding protein. , 1995, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[39]  Jun Ma,et al.  An HMG-like protein that can switch a transcriptional activator to a repressor , 1994, Nature.

[40]  Tony Pawson,et al.  SH2 domain specificity and activity modified by a single residue , 1994, Nature.

[41]  J. Alvarez,et al.  terminal flower: a gene affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1992 .

[42]  S. Shannon,et al.  A Mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 Gene Affects Inflorescence Meristem Development. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[43]  Robert M. Horton,et al.  Gene splicing by overlap extension. , 1990 .