Do Campaign Speeches Predict Foreign Policy? An Operational Code and Leadership Trait Analysis of Donald Trump’s MENA Policies

This article investigates whether campaign speeches during the US presidential elections can help predict foreign policy behavior. We use speeches made by Donald J. Trump during his bid for president in 2016. We compare the analysis from 2016 with his actual foreign policy decisions during his tenure, 2017-2020. Operational code analysis and leadership traits analysis approaches are used to analyze candidate Trump’s foreign policy beliefs and strategies associated with them. We use Profiler Plus software to conduct content analysis which produces OCA and LTA results. We use three separate datasets to analyze Trump’s beliefs and traits focusing on his general foreign policy speeches, the MENA region, and a third one only about Islamic State and Syria. Our results show that Trump’s profile indicates a foreign policy orientation that avoids involvement in affairs that are perceived as beyond immediate interests. The consistency between his beliefs and traits during the 2016 campaign and his actual foreign policy behavior leads us to conclude that individual level analysis, and specifically OCA and LTA approaches, are useful tools to analyze, explain and predict foreign policy.

[1]  B. Day,et al.  Wrestlemania! Summit Diplomacy and Foreign Policy Performance after Trump , 2022, International Studies Quarterly.

[2]  Joshua E. Lambert,et al.  Psychological Characteristics of Leaders (PsyCL): A New Data Set , 2022, Foreign Policy Analysis.

[3]  Sercan Canbolat.  Deciphering Deadly Minds in Their Native Language , 2021 .

[4]  Juliet Kaarbo,et al.  Predictably unpredictable: Trump’s personality and approach towards China , 2021 .

[5]  Michael D. Young,et al.  Forum: Coding in Tongues: Developing Non-English Coding Schemes for Leadership Profiling , 2020 .

[6]  Nihal Yetkin Karakoç,et al.  Trump Döneminde Diplomatik Aktör Olarak Çevirmenler , 2020 .

[7]  A. Ş. Ovali.  Türkiye-ABD İlişkilerinde Twitter Diplomasisi , 2020 .

[8]  Özgür Özdamar,et al.  European populist radical right leaders’ foreign policy beliefs: An operational code analysis , 2020, European Journal of International Relations.

[9]  Barış Kesgin.  Turkey’s Erdoğan: leadership style and foreign policy audiences , 2019, Turkish Studies.

[10]  Kurt Weyland.  Populism and authoritarianism , 2018, Routledge Handbook of Global Populism.

[11]  K. Jørgensen.  Theorising the European Union’s foreign policy , 2018, Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy.

[12]  S. Walker,et al.  The Operational Codes of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton , 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Political Science.

[13]  Özgür Özdamar,et al.  Understanding New Middle Eastern Leadership: An Operational Code Approach , 2018 .

[14]  Özgür Özdamar.  Leadership Analysis at a “Great Distance”: Using the Operational Code Construct to Analyse Islamist Leaders , 2017 .

[15]  Juliet Kaarbo,et al.  Personality or Role? Comparisons of Turkish Leaders Across Different Institutional Positions , 2017 .

[16]  J. Rosenau.  National Leadership and Foreign Policy: A Case Study in the Mobilization of Public Support , 2015 .

[17]  Sinem Akgül Açikmeşe,et al.  Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramlarında Ana Akımlara Yeniden Bakış , 2015 .

[18]  Michael Young,et al.  Leadership Trait Analysis and Threat Assessment with Profiler Plus , 2014, ILC.

[19]  Fulya Ereker.  Dış Politikayı Analiz Etmek: Dış Politika Analizinde Yapan-Yapı Sorunu , 2013 .

[20]  Kurt Weyland.  Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left , 2013 .

[21]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  A Political Theory of Populism , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Cameron G. Thies.  Role Theory and Foreign Policy , 2010 .

[23]  Gültekin Sümer.  Amerikan Dış Politikasının Kökenleri ve Amerikan Dış Politik Kültürü , 2008 .

[24]  Özgür Özdamar.  Oyun Kuramının Uluslararası İlişkiler Yazınına Katkıları , 2007 .

[25]  Michael D. Young,et al.  Presidential Operational Codes and Foreign Policy Conflicts in the Post-Cold War World , 1999 .

[26]  Emmanuel N. Amadife.  Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy-Making , 1999 .

[27]  O. Holsti,et al.  Liberals, Populists, Libertarians, and Conservatives: The Link between Domestic and International Affairs , 1996 .

[28]  S. Walker.  The evolution of operational code analysis , 1990 .

[29]  S. Walker.  The Motivational Foundations of Political Belief Systems: A Re-Analysis of the Operational Code Construct , 1983 .

[30]  M. Hermann.  CommentsOn “Foreign Policy Makers, Personality Attributes, and Interviews: A Note on Reliability Problems” , 1980 .

[31]  Margaret G. Hermann,et al.  Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using the Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders , 1980 .

[32]  K. Holsti.  National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy , 1970 .

[33]  A. George.  The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making , 1969 .

[34]  N. Leites.  A Study Of Bolshevism , 1954 .

[35]  Sercan Canbolat.  UNDERSTANDING THE NEW MIDDLE EASTERN LEADERS: AN OPERATIONAL CODE APPROACH , 2014 .

[36]  Barış Kesgin.  Political Leadership and Foreign Policy in Post-Cold War Israel and Turkey , 2011 .

[37]  V. Hudson.  Foreign policy analysis : classic and contemporary theory , 2007 .

[38]  S. Walker,et al.  Beliefs and leadership in world politics : methods and applications of operational code analysis , 2006 .

[39]  M. Hermann.  ASSESSING LEADERSHIP STYLE: A TRAIT ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[40]  Burton M. Sapin,et al.  Decision-making as an approach to the study of international politics , 1954 .

[41]  Nathan Leites,et al.  The operational code of the Politburo , 1951 .

[42]  Operational Code Analysis and Foreign Policy Roles , 2022 .