A Novel Algorithm for Determining the Contextual Characteristics of Movement Behaviors by Combining Accelerometer Features and Wireless Beacons: Development and Implementation

Background Unfortunately, global efforts to promote “how much” physical activity people should be undertaking have been largely unsuccessful. Given the difficulty of achieving a sustained lifestyle behavior change, many scientists are reexamining their approaches. One such approach is to focus on understanding the context of the lifestyle behavior (ie, where, when, and with whom) with a view to identifying promising intervention targets. Objective The aim of this study was to develop and implement an innovative algorithm to determine “where” physical activity occurs using proximity sensors coupled with a widely used physical activity monitor. Methods A total of 19 Bluetooth beacons were placed in fixed locations within a multilevel, mixed-use building. In addition, 4 receiver-mode sensors were fitted to the wrists of a roving technician who moved throughout the building. The experiment was divided into 4 trials with different walking speeds and dwelling times. The data were analyzed using an original and innovative algorithm based on graph generation and Bayesian filters. Results Linear regression models revealed significant correlations between beacon-derived location and ground-truth tracking time, with intraclass correlations suggesting a high goodness of fit (R2=.9780). The algorithm reliably predicted indoor location, and the robustness of the algorithm improved with a longer dwelling time (>100 s; error <10%, R2=.9775). Increased error was observed for transitions between areas due to the device sampling rate, currently limited to 0.1 Hz by the manufacturer. Conclusions This study shows that our algorithm can accurately predict the location of an individual within an indoor environment. This novel implementation of “context sensing” will facilitate a wealth of new research questions on promoting healthy behavior change, the optimization of patient care, and efficient health care planning (eg, patient-clinician flow, patient-clinician interaction).

[1]  N. Wareham,et al.  The validation of physical activity instruments for measuring energy expenditure: problems and pitfalls , 1998, Public Health Nutrition.

[2]  Jane Wardle,et al.  Indoor Tracking to Understand Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour: Exploratory Study in UK Office Buildings , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  Kalyan S. Pasupathy,et al.  Asset management in healthcare: Evaluation of RFID , 2014 .

[4]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  Geospatial and contextual approaches to energy balance and health , 2015, Ann. GIS.

[5]  R. Sampson,et al.  ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research , 2002 .

[6]  Lauren B Sherar,et al.  Technologies That Assess the Location of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Oliver E. Theel,et al.  An Improved BLE Indoor Localization with Kalman-Based Fusion: An Experimental Study , 2017, Sensors.

[8]  Dale W Esliger,et al.  Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. , 2009, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[9]  Luis Orozco-Barbosa,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Transmission Power Setting for Bluetooth-Based Indoor Localization Mechanisms , 2017, Sensors.

[10]  Nils Y. Hammerla,et al.  A study of wrist-worn activity measurement as a potential real-world biomarker for late-life depression , 2016, Psychological Medicine.

[11]  D C Ranasinghe,et al.  Low cost and batteryless sensor-enabled radio frequency identification tag based approaches to identify patient bed entry and exit posture transitions. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[12]  Jacqueline Kerr,et al.  A Framework for Using GPS Data in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Studies , 2015, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[13]  Juan M. Corchado,et al.  A Framework to Improve Energy Efficient Behaviour at Home through Activity and Context Monitoring , 2017, Sensors.

[14]  David Ogilvie,et al.  Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  T. M. Wood,et al.  Issues and Future Directions in Assessing Physical Activity: An Introduction to the Conference Proceedings , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[16]  M. Malajner,et al.  Using RSSI value for distance estimation in wireless sensor networks based on ZigBee , 2008, 2008 15th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing.

[17]  J. Bather,et al.  Tracking and data fusion , 2001 .

[18]  Nuala M. Byrne,et al.  Assessment of Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: An Overview of Objective Measures , 2014, Front. Nutr..

[19]  Jennie Popay,et al.  A proper place to live: health inequalities, agency and the normative dimensions of space. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Jaclyn P. Maher,et al.  Sedentary behavior as a daily process regulated by habits and intentions. , 2013, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  Steven Cummins,et al.  Understanding and representing 'place' in health research: a relational approach. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[22]  Thomas R Kirchner,et al.  Spatio-temporal determinants of mental health and well-being: advances in geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA) , 2016, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[23]  A. Cooper,et al.  Greenspace and children's physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[24]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Outdoor physical activity and self rated health in older adults living in two regions of the U.S. , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.