Lightweight UAV digital elevation models and orthoimagery for environmental applications: data accuracy evaluation and potential for river flood risk modelling

ABSTRACT Digital elevation models (DEMs) generated from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry offer opportunities for on-demand DEM production in environmental modelling and flood risk prediction applications. The DEM and orthoimage accuracies that can be achieved using lightweight UAV on-board sensors only, are compared with cases where progressively higher numbers of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) referenced ground targets are utilized. Unacceptably large 95% planimetric orthoimage errors of 5.22 m (root mean square error (RMSE) 3.27 m), and DEM 95% elevation errors of 5.03 m (RMSE 2.2 m) are observed when using the on-board positioning and orientation sensors only. Introducing GNSS ground control points (GCPs) in increasing numbers progressively and substantially improves data accuracy. Remarkably small xy orthoimage errors of 0.076 m (RMS) and DEM elevation errors of 0.08 m (RMS) are achieved using 1 GCP for every 2 ha of ground area and utilizing more GCPs produced more or less identical results. These accuracies compare very favourably with the best commercial airborne survey DEMs, suggesting strong potential for the application of lightweight UAV photogrammetric DEMs in local environmental modelling and flood risk prediction applications. The potential of these DEMS for flood prediction is subsequently assessed and demonstrated by comparison with published flood risk maps and flood depth data, and by cross-comparing the outputs of the UAV DEM flood model predictions.

[1]  P. Kyriakidis,et al.  Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling , 2000 .

[2]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[3]  K. Holmesa,et al.  Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling , 2000 .

[4]  D. Mason,et al.  Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling , 2001 .

[5]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[6]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Accuracy of Airborne Lidar-Derived Elevation: Empirical Assessment and Error Budget , 2004 .

[7]  A. Haile,et al.  Effects of LIDAR DEM resolution in flood modelling : a model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras , 2005 .

[8]  G. Verstraeten.  Regional scale modelling of hillslope sediment delivery with SRTM elevation data , 2006 .

[9]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol.XXXVI, Part 3 / W52 , 2007 .

[10]  B. Sanders.  Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[12]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Raster modelling of coastal flooding from sea‐level rise , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  A. Large.  Laser Scanning for the Environmental Sciences , 2009 .

[14]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Dual-scale validation of a medium-resolution coastal DEM with terrestrial LiDAR DSM and GPS , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  The impact of DEM data source on prediction of flooding and erosion risk due to sea-level rise , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[16]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Terrestrial laser scan error in the presence of dense ground vegetation , 2011 .

[17]  Brian Hadley,et al.  Vertical Accuracy and Use of Topographic LIDAR Data in Coastal Marshes , 2011 .

[18]  C. Strecha,et al.  The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-light UAV Imagery , 2012 .

[19]  Florian Segor,et al.  Towards Autonomous Micro UAV Swarms , 2011, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[20]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR MAPPING AND 3D MODELING - CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES - , 2012 .

[21]  C. Strecha,et al.  PHOTOGRAMMETRIC PERFORMANCE OF AN ULTRA LIGHT WEIGHT SWINGLET UAV , 2012 .

[22]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[23]  Seamus Coveney.  Association of elevation error with surface type, vegetation class and data origin in discrete-returns airborne LiDAR , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[24]  P. Bates,et al.  Scheduling satellite-based SAR acquisition for sequential assimilation of water level observations into flood modelling , 2013 .

[25]  Robert Denham,et al.  The use of multi temporal LiDAR to assess basin-scale erosion and deposition following the catastrophic January 2011 Lockyer flood, SE Queensland, Australia , 2013 .

[26]  Michael A. Batten,et al.  Flood Modeling Using a Synthesis of Multi-Platform LiDAR Data , 2013 .

[27]  Anuar Ahmad,et al.  Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy Based on Variation Flying Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2014 .

[28]  T. I. Eldho,et al.  A web GIS based integrated flood assessment modeling tool for coastal urban watersheds , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[29]  Christian Heipke,et al.  UAV-based photogrammetry: monitoring of a building zone , 2014 .

[30]  Livio Pinto,et al.  Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[31]  Anuar Ahmad,et al.  The Potential of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Large Scale Mapping of Coastal Area , 2014 .

[32]  V. Klemas,et al.  Coastal and Environmental Remote Sensing from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Overview , 2015 .

[33]  Gustav Tolt,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of 3D lidar data from small UAV , 2015, SPIE Security + Defence.

[34]  A. S. Toprak,et al.  DEM generation with UAV Photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler hill , 2015 .

[35]  A. Tamminga,et al.  Hyperspatial Remote Sensing of Channel Reach Morphology and Hydraulic Fish Habitat Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV): A First Assessment in the Context of River Research and Management , 2015 .

[36]  D. Petrea,et al.  Flood-prone area delimitation using UAV technology, in the areas hard-to-reach for classic aircrafts: case study in the north-east of Apuseni Mountains, Transylvania , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[37]  Fabio Meloni,et al.  Direct Measurement of Tree Height Provides Different Results on the Assessment of LiDAR Accuracy , 2016 .