A Comparative Effect of Intravenous Pethidine vs Sufentanil on Attenuation of Cardiovascular Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial Study

Background: The study was undertaken to compare the effects of small doses of sufentanil or pethidine on cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation. Patients and Methods: Sixty American Soceity of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II patients, scheduled for elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, randomly allocated in a double- blind fashion to receive an intravenous bolus of either sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg (Group S, n = 30) or pethidine 1.5 mg/kg (Group P, n = 30) for induction of anesthesia. The heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before induction of anaesthesia (baseline), at 1-min intervals for 3 min after the induction of anesthesia, at 1, 3, 5, and 7 min after start of laryngoscopy. Results: No significant differences in SAP, DAP, and MAP were observed between the two groups. Heart rate significantly increased 2 and 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia and 1 minute after intubation in group P compared with group S (P<0.01). However, the numbers of patients who developed a heart rate increase more than 20% of basal value were not different between two groups. At the end of the study period, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure slightly decreased from preinduction values that was transient and did not require treatment. Conclusions: If adequate timing in opioid administration is warranted according to the time to peak effect of each opioid drug, small doses of sufentanil or pethidine exert similar effect in controlling the inotropic response induced by the laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

[1]  N. Soomro,et al.  Reducing cardiovascular responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a comparison of equipotent doses of tramadol, nalbuphine and pethidine, with placebo. , 2004, Middle East journal of anaesthesiology.

[2]  E. Iannuzzi,et al.  Peri-intubation cardiovascular response during low dose remifentanil or sufentanil administration in association with propofol TCI. A double blind comparison. , 2004, Minerva anestesiologica.

[3]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Small doses of remifentanil or sufentanil for blunting cardiovascular changes induced by tracheal intubation: a double-blind comparison , 2001, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[4]  D. Rowbotham,et al.  Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients. , 2001, British journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  M. Kluger,et al.  Effect of bolus dose of remifentanil on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. , 2000, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[6]  I. R. Thomson,et al.  Concentration‐Response Relationships for Fentanyl and Sufentanil in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[7]  Dong-Chan Kim,et al.  Small-Dose Fentanyl: Optimal Time of Injection for Blunting the Circulatory Responses to Tracheal Intubation , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  I. R. Thomson,et al.  Dose-response to anaesthetic induction with sufentanil: haemodynamic and electroencephalographic effects , 1997, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[9]  R. Howard-Griffin,et al.  Co‐induction and laryngeal mask insertion# A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol , 1997, Anaesthesia.

[10]  N. Edwards,et al.  Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  R. Martineau,et al.  Effects of Alfentanil on the Hemodynamic and Catecholamine Response to Tracheal Intubation , 1993, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  D. Reich,et al.  Haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation following etomidate and fentanyl for anaesthetic induction , 1992, Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie.

[13]  D. Silverman,et al.  A comparison of fentanyl, esmolol, and their combination for blunting the haemodynamic responses during rapid-sequence induction , 1992, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[14]  F. Ellis,et al.  Esmolol hydrochloride for management of the cardiovascular stress responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  N. Bruder,et al.  Conséquences et moyens de prévention des modifications hémodynamiques lors de la laryngoscopie et de l'intubation endotrachéale , 1992 .

[16]  H. Obara,et al.  Effect of nicardipine on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. , 1990, British journal of anaesthesia.

[17]  C A Dawson,et al.  First Pass Uptake of Fentanyl, Meperidine, and Morphine in the Human Lung , 1987, Anesthesiology.

[18]  B. C. Bloor,et al.  Comparison of Morphine, Meperidine, Fentanyl, and Sufentanil in Balanced Anesthesia: A Double‐Blind Study , 1985, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  G. Smith,et al.  Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. , 1983, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  T. Tercier Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: Intravenous or laryngotracheal? , 1983 .

[21]  W. J. Russell,et al.  CHANGES IN PLASMA CATECHOLAMINE CONCENTRATIONS DURING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION , 1981 .

[22]  R. Stoelting Attenuation of Blood Pressure Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intutation with Sodium Nitroprusside , 1979, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[23]  E. Fox,et al.  Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. , 1977, Anesthesiology.

[24]  R. Stoelting Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine. , 1977, Anesthesiology.