A global pharmaceutical company initiative: an evidence-based approach to define the upper limit of body weight loss in short term toxicity studies.

Short term toxicity studies are conducted in animals to provide information on major adverse effects typically at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Such studies are important from a scientific and ethical perspective as they are used to make decisions on progression of potential candidate drugs, and to set dose levels for subsequent regulatory studies. The MTD is usually determined by parameters such as clinical signs, reductions in body weight and food consumption. However, these assessments are often subjective and there are no published criteria to guide the selection of an appropriate MTD. Even where an objective measurement exists, such as body weight loss (BWL), there is no agreement on what level constitutes an MTD. A global initiative including 15 companies, led by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), has shared data on BWL in toxicity studies to assess the impact on the animal and the study outcome. Information on 151 studies has been used to develop an alert/warning system for BWL in short term toxicity studies. The data analysis supports BWL limits for short term dosing (up to 7days) of 10% for rat and dog and 6% for non-human primates (NHPs).

[1]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  Sally Robinson,et al.  Are acute toxicity studies required to support overdose for new medicines? , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[3]  Errol Zeiger,et al.  Summary of the OECD’s New Guidance Document on the Recognition, Assessment, and Use of Clinical Signs as Humane Endpoints for Experimental Animals Used in Safety Evaluation , 2003 .

[4]  D. Morton,et al.  A systematic approach for establishing humane endpoints. , 2000, ILAR journal.

[5]  T. Jeneskog,et al.  Pain and distress in laboratory rodents and lagomorphs: Report of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) Working Group on Pain and Distress accepted by the FELASA Board of Management November 1992 , 1994, Laboratory animals.

[6]  A. Balmain,et al.  Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Martin F. Wilks,et al.  The value of acute toxicity studies to support the clinical management of overdose and poisoning: a cross-discipline consensus. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  I. Horii Dose selection for carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals. , 1995, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[9]  P. H. Griffiths,et al.  Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment , 1985, Veterinary Record.

[10]  Sally Robinson,et al.  A European pharmaceutical company initiative challenging the regulatory requirement for acute toxicity studies in pharmaceutical drug development. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.