Selection on weapon allometry in the wild.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Z. Emberts,et al. Weapon morphology and performance predict fighting outcomes in the giant mesquite bug, Pachylis neocalifornicus , 2023, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.
[2] L. A. Campos,et al. Phylogeny of Pachylis Lepeletier & Serville, 1825 (Hemiptera, Coreidae, Coreinae) with Thasus Stål, 1865 as a new synonym, and the redescription of Pachylis laticornis (Fabricius, 1798) , 2022, Zoosystema.
[3] A. Palaoro,et al. Biomechanics influence sexual dimorphism in the giant mesquite bug, Thasus neocalifornicus. , 2021, Zoology.
[4] J. Wiens,et al. Damage from intraspecific combat is costly , 2021, Behavioral Ecology.
[5] Wei Song Hwang,et al. Weapon performance drives weapon evolution , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[6] Z. Emberts,et al. Defensive structures influence fighting outcomes , 2020, bioRxiv.
[7] Christine W. Miller,et al. The evolution of autotomy in leaf‐footed bugs , 2020, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[8] R. L. Rodríguez,et al. Why the static allometry of sexually-selected traits is so variable: the importance of function. , 2019, Integrative and comparative biology.
[9] Christine W. Miller,et al. The hidden cost of sexually selected traits: the metabolic expense of maintaining a sexually selected weapon , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[10] C. E. Allen,et al. On the evolution of extreme structures: static scaling and the function of sexually selected signals , 2018, Animal Behaviour.
[11] Matthew C. Metz,et al. Predation shapes the evolutionary traits of cervid weapons , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[12] B. Buzatto,et al. Sexual Selection and Static Allometry: The Importance of Function , 2018, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[13] L. Simmons,et al. Experimental manipulation reveals a trade‐off between weapons and testes , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[14] Paul N. Joseph,et al. Males that drop a sexually selected weapon grow larger testes , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] D. Emlen,et al. Selection on an extreme weapon in the frog‐legged leaf beetle (Sagra femorata) , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[16] Christine W. Miller,et al. Seasonal Effects on the Population, Morphology and Reproductive Behavior of Narnia femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae) , 2017, Insects.
[17] Christine W. Miller,et al. The tale of the shrinking weapon: seasonal changes in nutrition affect weapon size and sexual dimorphism, but not contemporary evolution , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[18] Christine W. Miller,et al. Coreidae (Insecta: Hemiptera) Limb Loss and Autotomy , 2016 .
[19] Christine W. Miller,et al. Resource quality affects weapon and testis size and the ability of these traits to respond to selection in the leaf‐footed cactus bug, Narnia femorata , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[20] I. Dworkin,et al. Tipping the scales: Evolution of the allometric slope independent of average trait size , 2016, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[21] K. L. Voje,et al. Scaling of Morphological Characters across Trait Type, Sex, and Environment , 2016, The American Naturalist.
[22] T. F. Hansen,et al. Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] Christine W. Miller,et al. Different environments lead to a reversal in the expression of weapons and testes in the heliconia bug, Leptoscelis tricolor (Hemiptera: Coreidae) , 2015 .
[24] Christine W. Miller,et al. Sexual selection is influenced by both developmental and adult environments , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[25] T. F. Hansen,et al. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Evolution of Morphological Allometry , 2022 .
[26] C. Pélabon,et al. ALLOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF ALLOMETRY , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] Thomas F Hansen,et al. EVOLUTION OF STATIC ALLOMETRIES: ADAPTIVE CHANGE IN ALLOMETRIC SLOPES OF EYE SPAN IN STALK‐EYED FLIES , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[28] T. F. Hansen,et al. Artificial selection on allometry: change in elevation but not slope , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[29] Christine W. Miller,et al. The form of sexual selection arising from male–male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[30] F. H. Rodd,et al. Temporally Variable Multivariate Sexual Selection on Sexually Dimorphic Traits in a Wild Insect Population , 2010, The American Naturalist.
[31] J. DiBattista,et al. It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. , 2009, Ecology letters.
[32] D. Gwynne,et al. Sexual Selection for Male Mobility in a Giant Insect with Female‐Biased Size Dimorphism , 2008, The American Naturalist.
[33] R. Bonduriansky. ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00081.x SEXUAL SELECTION AND ALLOMETRY: A CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL OF THE EVIDENCE AND IDEAS , 2006 .
[34] James H. Brown,et al. The allometry of ornaments and weapons. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] P. Brakefield,et al. Natural Selection and Developmental Constraints in the Evolution of Allometries , 2005, Science.
[36] P. Conway. Tipping the Scales , 2004, Science's STKE.
[37] M. Peruggia. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.) , 2003 .
[38] David R. Anderson,et al. Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .
[39] T. Miyatake. Multi-Male Mating Aggregation in Notobitus meleagris (Hemiptera: Coreidae) , 2002 .
[40] M. Rosenberg. Fiddler crab claw shape variation : a geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea : Brachyura : Ocypodidae) , 2002 .
[41] D. Berrigan,et al. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] G. Wilkinson,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND EYE‐SPAN ALLOMETRY IN STALK‐EYED FLIES (DIOPSIDAE) , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[43] J. M. Hoekstra,et al. The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[44] Olaf Ellers,et al. Scaling in biology , 2001, Complex..
[45] D. Emlen,et al. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[46] W. Eberhard. Sexual behavior of Acanthocephala declivis guatemalana (Hemiptera: Coreidae) and the allometric scaling of their modified hind legs , 1998 .
[47] K. Kawano. Cost of evolving exaggerated mandibles in stag beetles (Coleoptera : Lucanidae) , 1997 .
[48] G. Wilkinson. Artificial sexual selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae) , 1993 .
[49] T. Mitchell-Olds,et al. REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[50] P. L. Mitchell. Combat and Territorial Defense of Acanthocephala femorata (Hemiptera: Coreidae) , 1980 .
[51] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[52] S. Gould. ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[53] G. Holwell,et al. Scramble competition polygyny in terrestrial arthropods , 2017 .
[54] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[55] G. Wilkinson,et al. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND EYE-SPAN ALLOMETRY IN STALK-EYED FLIES (DIOPSIDAE) , 2001 .
[56] G. Jong. Covariances Between Traits Deriving From Successive Allocations of a Resource , 1993 .
[57] G. Bidder. Constant Differential Growth-ratios and their Significance , 1925, Nature.
[58] D'arcy W. Thompson,et al. On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.