Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming

Abstract Words which frequently co-occur in language (‘collocations’) are often thought to be independently stored in speakers' minds. This idea is tested here through experiments investigating the extent to which corpus-identified collocations exhibit mental ‘priming’ in a group of native speakers. Collocational priming is found to exist. However, in an experiment which aimed to exclude higher-order mental processes, and focus instead on the ‘automatic’ processes which are thought to best reflect the organisation of the mental lexicon, priming is restricted to collocations which are also psychological associates. While the former finding suggests that collocations found in a large corpus are likely to have psychological reality, the latter suggests that we may need to elaborate our models of how they are represented.

[1]  J. Shelton,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  M. Hoey Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language , 2005 .

[3]  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis,et al.  When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: toward a dual-process model of language. , 2004, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[4]  G. Leech,et al.  Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: based on the British National Corpus , 2001 .

[5]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  P. Nation,et al.  Beyond single words: the most frequent collocations in spoken English , 2007 .

[7]  Michael Lewis The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and a Way Forward , 2002 .

[8]  David A. Balota,et al.  Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .

[9]  Jeremy Clear,et al.  From Firth Principles — Computational Tools for the Study of Collocation , 1993 .

[10]  Alison Wray Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: Formulaic Language and the Lexicon , 2002 .

[11]  James M. Hodgson Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming , 1991 .

[12]  T. Herbst What are collocations: Sandy beaches or false teeth? , 1996 .

[13]  Susanne Handl,et al.  Essential collocations for learners of English: The role of collocational direction and weight , 2008 .

[14]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions , 1999 .

[15]  John N. Williams Is Automatic Priming Semantic , 1996 .

[16]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Memory for language , 2001 .

[17]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography , 1989, ACL.

[18]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[19]  J. Sereno Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming , 1991 .

[20]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Svenja Adolphs,et al.  Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? , 2004 .

[22]  M. Coltheart,et al.  358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  Michael Hoey,et al.  Patterns of Lexis In Text , 1991 .

[24]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  COLLOCATIONS AND SEMANTIC PROFILES: ON THE CAUSE OF THE TROUBLE WITH QUANTITATIVE STUDIES , 1995 .

[25]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[26]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[27]  Philip Durrant Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for Academic Purposes. , 2009 .

[28]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage , 2003 .

[29]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The Effects of Associative and Semantic Priming in the Lexical Decision Task , 2022 .

[30]  Robert Bley-Vroman FREQUENCY IN PRODUCTION, COMPREHENSION, AND ACQUISITION , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[31]  G. Underwood,et al.  Exploring the processing of formulaic sequences through a self-paced reading task , 2004 .

[32]  R. Schmidt Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing , 1989 .

[34]  G. Miller,et al.  Contexts of antonymous adjectives , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[35]  S. Jones,et al.  English lexical collocations - A study in computational linguistics , 1974 .

[36]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody (1): Lexical access , 2009 .

[37]  Jeanette Altarriba,et al.  Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions , 1988 .

[38]  J. R. Firth,et al.  A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955 , 1957 .

[39]  Nan Jiang,et al.  The Processing of Formulaic Sequences by Second Language Speakers. , 2007 .

[40]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure , 2008 .

[41]  K M Eberhard,et al.  Dissociation between syntactic and semantic processing during idiom comprehension. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[43]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: mediated priming revisited. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  G. Underwood,et al.  The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences , 2004 .

[45]  J. Sinclair Collocation: a progress report , 1987 .

[46]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[47]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  N. Ellis,et al.  Formulaic Language in Native and Second Language Speakers: Psycholinguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and TESOL , 2008 .

[49]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Lexical representation of cognates and noncognates in compound bilinguals , 1991 .

[50]  Susan Hunston,et al.  Corpora in Applied Linguistics , 2002 .

[51]  T. Fitzpatrick Word association patterns: unpacking the assumptions , 2007 .

[52]  Kathy Conklin,et al.  Formulaic Sequences: Are They Processed More Quickly than Nonformulaic Language by Native and Nonnative Speakers? , 2008 .