The informationist: building evidence for an emerging health profession.

BACKGROUND To encourage evidence-based practice, an Annals of Internal Medicine editorial called for a new professional on clinical teams: an informationist trained in science or medicine as well as information science. OBJECTIVES The study explored the effects of informationists on information behaviors of clinical research teams, specifically, frequency of seeking information for clinical or research decisions, range of resources consulted, perceptions about access to information, confidence in adequacy of literature searches, and effects on decision making and practice. It also explored perceptions about training and experience needed for successful informationists. METHODS Exploratory focus groups and key interviews were followed by baseline and follow-up surveys conducted with researchers and clinicians receiving the service. Survey data were analyzed with Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Comparing 2006 to 2004 survey responses, the researchers found that study participants reported: seeking answers to questions more frequently, spending more time seeking or using information, believing time was less of an obstacle to finding or using information, using more information resources, and feeling greater satisfaction with their ability to find answers. Participants' opinions on informationists' qualifications evolved to include both subject knowledge and information searching expertise. CONCLUSION Over time, clinical research teams with informationists demonstrated changes in their information behaviors, and they valued an informationist's subject matter expertise more.

[1]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  B. Buchanan,et al.  Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  P. Gorman,et al.  Can primary care physicians' questions be answered using the medical journal literature? , 1994, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[4]  S. Grefsheim,et al.  The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature. , 2008, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[5]  Rex R. Robison.  Informationist Education , 2008, Medical reference services quarterly.

[6]  Barbara A Epstein,et al.  Design and implementation of a library-based information service in molecular biology and genetics at the University of Pittsburgh. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[7]  A. Verhoeven,et al.  Effect of an evidence-based answering service on GPs and their patients: a pilot study. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[8]  S. Grefsheim,et al.  Information needs and information seeking in a biomedical research setting: a study of scientists and science administrators. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[10]  Kathleen B. Oliver,et al.  Bioterrorism alert: reference and literature support for the CDC Director’s Emergency Operations Center (DEOC) and investigative field teams , 2004 .

[11]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions? , 2005, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[12]  P. Dalrymple.  The Impact of Medical Informatics on Librarianship , 2002 .

[13]  Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse,et al.  Research Paper: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Clinical Informatics Consult Service: Impact on Evidence-based Decision-making and Knowledge Implementation , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  A comparative case study of two models of a clinical informaticist service , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  D S Ketchell,et al.  A library-based bioinformatics services program. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[16]  I Diane Cooper,et al.  Inquiring Informationists: A Qualitative Exploration of Our Role. , 2009, Evidence based library and information practice.

[17]  C. Fikar,et al.  Non-librarian health professionals becoming librarians and information specialists: results of an Internet survey. , 2001, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[18]  L F Schacher.  Clinical Librarianship: Its Value in Medical Care , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  D. Masys.  Effects of current and future information technologies on the health care workforce. , 2002, Health affairs.

[20]  Ruth M Sladek,et al.  The informationist: a prospective uncontrolled study. , 2004, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[21]  Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Evolution of a Mature Clinical Informationist Model , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  V Florance,et al.  The Informationist: A New Health Profession? , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  S Trent Rosenbloom,et al.  Providing Evidence-Based Answers to Complex Clinical Questions: Evaluating the Consistency of Article Selection , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  D. Covell,et al.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met? , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  Tara Tobin Cataldo,et al.  Subject specialization in a liaison librarian program. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[26]  S. Grefsheim,et al.  Informationist programme in support of biomedical research: a programme description and preliminary findings of an evaluation. , 2008, Health information and libraries journal.

[27]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.