Targeting the DNA damage response in oncology: past, present and future perspectives

Purpose of review The success of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition in BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient tumors as an anticancer strategy provided proof-of-concept for a synthetic lethality approach in oncology. There is therefore now active interest in expanding this approach to include other agents targeting the DNA damage response (DDR). We review lessons learnt from the development of inhibitors against DNA damage response mechanisms and envision the future of DNA repair inhibition in oncology. Recent findings Preclinical synthetic lethality screens may potentially identify the best combinations of DNA-damaging drugs with inhibitors of DNA repair and the DDR or two agents acting within the DDR. Efforts are currently being made to establish robust and cost-effective assays that may be implemented within appropriate time-scales in parallel with future clinical studies. Detection of relevant mutations in a high-throughput manner, such as with next-generation sequencing for genes implicated in homologous recombination, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and ataxia telangiectasia mutated is anticipated. Novel approaches targeting the DDR are currently being evaluated and inhibitors of ATM, RAD51 and DNA-dependent protein kinase are now in early drug discovery and development. Summary There remains great enthusiasm in oncology practice for pursuing the strategy of synthetic lethality. The future development of antitumor agents targeting the DDR should include detailed correlative biomarker work within early phase clinical studies wherever possible, with clear attempts to identify doses at which robust target modulation is observed.

[1]  John E. Harlan,et al.  Iniparib Nonselectively Modifies Cysteine-Containing Proteins in Tumor Cells and Is Not a Bona Fide PARP Inhibitor , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  A. Evans,et al.  PTEN Deletion in Prostate Cancer Cells Does Not Associate with Loss of RAD51 Function: Implications for Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  M. Kelley DNA repair inhibitors: where do we go from here? , 2011, DNA repair.

[4]  S. Jalal,et al.  DNA Repair: From Genome Maintenance to Biomarker and Therapeutic Target , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  H. Mackay,et al.  Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo,et al.  Targeting ATR and Chk1 kinases for cancer treatment: A new model for new (and old) drugs , 2011, Molecular oncology.

[7]  J. Sarkaria,et al.  Identification and evaluation of a potent novel ATR inhibitor, NU6027, in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  S. Diamond,et al.  Identification of specific inhibitors of human RAD51 recombinase using high-throughput screening. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.

[9]  James R Bischoff,et al.  A cell-based screen identifies ATR inhibitors with synthetic lethal properties for cancer-associated mutations , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Parallel high-throughput RNA interference screens identify PINK1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cancers. , 2011, Cancer research.

[11]  Mark Yoffe,et al.  Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2011 .

[13]  T. Yap,et al.  Poly(ADP‐Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors: Exploiting a synthetic lethal strategy in the clinic , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[15]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Synthetic lethal approaches to breast cancer therapy , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  A. Ashworth,et al.  PTEN Deficiency in Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinomas Predicts Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  James H. Doroshow,et al.  Histone γH2AX and Poly(ADP-Ribose) as Clinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  R. Plummer Perspective on the Pipeline of Drugs Being Developed with Modulation of DNA Damage as a Target , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  A. Ashworth,et al.  A Marker of Homologous Recombination Predicts Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  A. Tutt,et al.  Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[21]  B. Ramaswamy,et al.  Targeting fanconi anemia (FA) repair pathway deficiency for treatment with PARP inhibitors. , 2010 .

[22]  Jan Lubinski,et al.  Poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  A. Ashworth,et al.  DNA Polymerases as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Cancers Deficient in the DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins MSH2 or MLH1 , 2010, Cancer cell.

[24]  M. O’Connor,et al.  ATM Deficiency Sensitizes Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells to Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Inhibitors , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[25]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Hoeijmakers DNA damage, aging, and cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  J. Bartek,et al.  The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease , 2009, Nature.

[28]  Jung-Sik Kim,et al.  Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with PARP inhibitors , 2009, EMBO molecular medicine.

[29]  M. Dutreix,et al.  Hyperactivation of DNA-PK by Double-Strand Break Mimicking Molecules Disorganizes DNA Damage Response , 2009, PloS one.

[30]  S. Gruber,et al.  Preclinical testing of the PARP inhibitor ABT-888 in microsatellite instable colorectal cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Jean-Luc Coll,et al.  Small-Molecule Drugs Mimicking DNA Damage: A New Strategy for Sensitizing Tumors to Radiotherapy , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  G. Mufti,et al.  Chromosomal instability syndromes are sensitive to poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors , 2008, Haematologica.

[33]  A. Harris,et al.  Phase I Study of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, AG014699, in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  M. Kastan,et al.  Transient inhibition of ATM kinase is sufficient to enhance cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation. , 2008, Cancer research.

[35]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  A synthetic lethal therapeutic approach: poly(ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of cancers deficient in DNA double-strand break repair. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Thomas Helleday,et al.  DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[37]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Utilizing RNA interference to enhance cancer drug discovery , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[38]  N. Curtin,et al.  Pyranone, thiopyranone, and pyridone inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase related kinases. Structure-activity relationships for DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibition, and identification of the first potent and selective inhibitor of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  I. Villegas,et al.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: new pharmacological functions and potential clinical implications. , 2007, Current pharmaceutical design.

[40]  R. Plummer,et al.  First and final report of a phase II study of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, AG014699, in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (MM). , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  N. Curtin,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of a potent novel DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor NU7441. , 2006, Cancer research.

[42]  S. Madhusudan,et al.  The emerging role of DNA repair proteins as predictive, prognostic and therapeutic targets in cancer. , 2005, Cancer treatment reviews.

[43]  J. Sosman,et al.  Phase II Trial of the O6-Alkylguanine DNA Alkyltransferase Inhibitor O6-Benzylguanine and 1,3-Bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-Nitrosourea in Advanced Melanoma , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[44]  Thomas Helleday,et al.  Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase , 2005, Nature.

[45]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy , 2005, Nature.

[46]  N. Curtin,et al.  Identification and Characterization of a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase ATM , 2004, Cancer Research.

[47]  R. McLendon,et al.  Phase II trial of carmustine plus O(6)-benzylguanine for patients with nitrosourea-resistant recurrent or progressive malignant glioma. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  J. Hoeijmakers Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer , 2001, Nature.

[49]  C. Kemp,et al.  Synthetic lethality between mutation in Atm and DNA-PKcs during murine embryogenesis , 2001, Current Biology.

[50]  E. Sausville,et al.  UCN-01: a potent abrogator of G2 checkpoint function in cancer cells with disrupted p53. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.