Compressed Sensing SAR Imaging with Multilook Processing

Multilook processing is a widely used speckle reduction approach in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging. Conventionally, it is achieved by incoherently summing of some independent low-resolution images formulated from overlapping subbands of the SAR signal. However, in the context of compressive sensing (CS) SAR imaging, where the samples are collected at sub-Nyquist rate, the data spectrum is highly aliased that hinders the direct application of the existing multilook techniques. In this letter, we propose a new CS-SAR imaging method that can realize multilook processing simultaneously during image reconstruction. The main idea is to replace the SAR observation matrix by the inverse of multilook procedures, which is then combined with random sampling matrix to yield a multilook CS-SAR observation model. Then a joint sparse regularization model, considering pixel dependency of subimages, is derived to form multilook images. The suggested SAR imaging method can not only reconstruct sparse scene efficiently below Nyquist rate, but is also able to achieve a comparable reduction of speckles during reconstruction. Simulation results are finally provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[2]  Joachim H. G. Ender,et al.  On compressive sensing applied to radar , 2010, Signal Process..

[3]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Compressed Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[4]  Zongben Xu,et al.  Fast Compressed Sensing SAR Imaging Based on Approximated Observation , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Group Sparse Coding , 2009, NIPS.

[6]  I. Daubechies,et al.  An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constraint , 2003, math/0307152.

[7]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  High-Resolution Radar via Compressed Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[10]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  Feature-enhanced synthetic aperture radar image formation based on nonquadratic regularization , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Emre Ertin,et al.  Sparsity and Compressed Sensing in Radar Imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Jianing Shi,et al.  A Nonlinear Inverse Scale Space Method for a Convex Multiplicative Noise Model , 2008, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[13]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[14]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Speckle reduction in multipolarization, multifrequency SAR imagery , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Richard Bamler,et al.  Tomographic SAR Inversion by $L_{1}$ -Norm Regularization—The Compressive Sensing Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Leonard J. Porcello,et al.  Speckle reduction in synthetic-aperture radars , 1976 .

[17]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Xiaotao Huang,et al.  Segmented Reconstruction for Compressed Sensing SAR Imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .