Parallel MR Imaging : A User ’ s Guide 1

Parallel imaging is a recently developed family of techniques that take advantage of the spatial information inherent in phased-array radiofrequency coils to reduce acquisition times in magnetic resonance imaging. In parallel imaging, the number of sampled k-space lines is reduced, often by a factor of two or greater, thereby significantly shortening the acquisition time. Parallel imaging techniques have only recently become commercially available, and the wide range of clinical applications is just beginning to be explored. The potential clinical applications primarily involve reduction in acquisition time, improved spatial resolution, or a combination of the two. Improvements in image quality can be achieved by reducing the echo train lengths of fast spin-echo and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Parallel imaging is particularly attractive for cardiac and vascular applications and will likely prove valuable as 3-T body and cardiovascular imaging becomes part of standard clinical practice. Limitations of parallel imaging include reduced signal-to-noise ratio and reconstruction artifacts. It is important to consider these limitations when deciding when to use these techniques. RSNA, 2005

[1]  W. Eubank,et al.  Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub‐millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Herbert Köstler,et al.  Auto‐SENSE perfusion imaging of the whole human heart , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  S. Einav,et al.  A decoupled coil detector array for fast image acquisition in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Medical physics.

[4]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Zahi A Fayad,et al.  Parallel and nonparallel simultaneous multislice black‐blood double inversion recovery techniques for vessel wall imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  X. Golay,et al.  Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Single breath-hold real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm , 2003, European Radiology.

[8]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Peter Hunold,et al.  Parallel acquisition techniques in cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging using TrueFISP sequences: Comparison of image quality and artifacts , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Cardiac real‐time imaging using SENSE , 2000 .

[11]  J W Carlson,et al.  Imaging time reduction through multiple receiver coil data acquisition and image reconstruction , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Hiroto Hatabu,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced pulmonary MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Parallel Imaging in MR Angiography , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[14]  Manojkumar Saranathan,et al.  Large field‐of‐view real‐time MRI with a 32‐channel system , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. Gieseke,et al.  Rapid Left-to-Right Shunt Quantification in Children by Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Sensitivity Encoding , 2003, Circulation.

[16]  R. Muthupillai,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in pediatric patients using sensitivity encoding , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  J B Ra,et al.  Fast imaging using subencoding data sets from multiple detectors , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: Feasibility study , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  High‐resolution MR‐imaging of the liver with T2‐weighted sequences using integrated parallel imaging: Comparison of prospective motion correction and respiratory triggering , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  E. McVeigh,et al.  Ghost artifact cancellation using phased array processing , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Gilmore,et al.  Practical consideration for 3T imaging. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[22]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced 3D MRA using SENSE , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[24]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[25]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  S. Riederer,et al.  Improved venous suppression and spatial resolution with SENSE in elliptical centric 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  2D sense for faster 3D MRI , 2002, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[28]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Fast MRI data acquisition using multiple detectors , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Current Concepts and Advances in Clinical Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[30]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly parallel volumetric imaging with a 32‐element RF coil array , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  P. Parizel,et al.  A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, European Radiology.

[32]  K P Pruessmann,et al.  Sensitivity encoded cardiac MRI. , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[33]  Klaas P Pruessmann,et al.  Parallel Imaging at High Field Strength: Synergies and Joint Potential , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[34]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Sensitivity encoding as a means of enhancing the SNR efficiency in steady‐state MRI , 2005, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[35]  Y. Itai,et al.  Double arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography: technical developments and clinical applications. , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[37]  Yasuo Nakajima,et al.  Coil sensitivity encoding in MR imaging: advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Real‐time accelerated interactive MRI with adaptive TSENSE and UNFOLD , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.