Continuous improvement in product development: Improvement programs and quality principles

– Continuous improvement has become an important strategy in improving organizational performance. Unfortunately, product development is often excluded in continuous improvement programs due to the special characteristics of product development activities. The overall purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of continuous improvement in the context of product development., – A central aspect in this context is that many organizations find it difficult to improve and learn if work is carried out in the form of projects. In this paper, a quality perspective on continuous improvement is introduced and its usefulness is tested empirically through three case studies in Swedish organizations. The focus is on the improvement programs used and the quality principles displayed in a product development context., – The results show that the three investigated organizations have multiple improvement programs, but that some configurations of improvement programs seem to be more successful than others. For instance, co‐ordination of multiple improvement programs, scope creep, and separating between product development processes and project management models are important success factors for continuous improvement. In addition, an introduction of an improvement program without adoption of a critical mass of quality principles is doomed to fail., – The research initiative is one of the first to conduct an empirical investigation of how organizations design and work with improvement programs in the context of product development. It provides knowledge to both academics and practitioners on how organizations can design and implement initiatives on quality management, especially in the context of product development.

[1]  N. Repenning,et al.  Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvement , 1997 .

[2]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  Capability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvement , 2002 .

[3]  John Bessant Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies can Outsmart Upstarts , 2001 .

[4]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[5]  John Bessant,et al.  An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behaviour , 2001 .

[6]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives , 1998 .

[7]  Alan G. Robinson,et al.  America's most successful export to Japan: Continuous improvement programs , 1991 .

[8]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From Continuous Improvement to Continuous Innovation , 2001 .

[9]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[10]  Scott F. Rockart,et al.  Overcoming the improvement paradox , 1999 .

[11]  Kentaro Nobeoka,et al.  INTER-PROJECT LEARNING IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. , 1995 .

[12]  T. Mitchell An Evaluation of the Validity of Correlational Research Conducted in Organizations , 1985 .

[13]  Carole K. Barnett Organizational learning and continuous quality improvement in an automotive manufacturing organization. , 1994 .

[14]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[15]  Alan Brown,et al.  Quality management over a decade: A longitudinal study , 2002 .

[16]  Lilian Nilsson Quality Practice - An Empirical Investigation of Product Development and the Goods-to-Services Continuum , 2002 .

[17]  Anders Gustafsson,et al.  The impact of quality practices on customer satisfaction and business results: product versus service organizations , 2001 .

[18]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  Getting quality the old-fashioned way : self confirming attributions in the dynamics of process improvement , 1997 .

[19]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[20]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Continuous improvement: Exploring alternative organizational designs , 2001 .

[21]  Anders Berger,et al.  Perspectives on Manufacturing Development - Discontinuous Change and Continuous Improvement , 1996 .

[22]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[23]  Anders Gustafsson,et al.  The Role of Quality Practices in Service Organizations , 2003 .

[24]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Fundamentals of Total Quality Management , 2005 .

[25]  J. Bessant,et al.  High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement , 1997 .

[26]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Fundamentals of Total Quality Management: Process analysis and improvement , 1997 .

[27]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Continuous Improvement: Quality Control Circles in Japanese Industry , 1989 .

[28]  Ian Barclay The new product development process: part 2. Improving the process of new product development , 1992 .

[29]  B. Klefsjö,et al.  TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools , 2000 .

[30]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[31]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing product development , 1992 .

[32]  Mariano Corso,et al.  Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development , 1997 .

[33]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[34]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Bringing Japanese Continuous Improvement Approaches to U.S. Manufacturing: The Roles of Process Orientation and Communications* , 1995 .

[35]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[36]  B. Bergman,et al.  Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction , 1994 .

[37]  Sarah Caffyn Extending continuous improvement to the new product development process , 1997 .

[38]  S. Merriam Case Study Research in Education , 1988 .