Experimental simulation of gear contact along the line of action

Abstract In highly loaded gears, lubricated rolling/sliding contact conditions change greatly along the line of action. This leads to variation in gear frictional properties and to failures such as pitting and scuffing that take place in different positions along the tooth flank. Information on instant contact behavior is therefore very useful, but this kind of measurement in real gears is extremely complicated. Single spur gear geometry has been simulated at 38 steady-state measuring points along the line of action using a twin-disc test device focusing on the friction coefficient and on temperature and lubrication conditions. Twin-disc simulations were adjusted to match real gear experiments by using similar maximum Hertzian pressure and surface velocities. The results show that the curve shapes for the mean friction coefficient as a function of pitch line velocity are similar to the corresponding experimental results with real gears. Further, the calculated thermal Λ -values of real gears and the measured mean contact resistance correspond well. This approach shows potential for simulating gear friction and failure mechanisms along the line of action.

[1]  J. L. Tevaarwerk,et al.  Shear behaviour of elastohydrodynamic oil films , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  J Yi,et al.  Gear surface temperature monitoring , 2005 .

[3]  A Oila,et al.  Assessment of the factors influencing micropitting in rolling/sliding contacts , 2005 .

[4]  Stefan Björklund,et al.  The influence of surface roughness and the contact pressure distribution on friction in rolling/sliding contacts , 2007 .

[5]  Shifeng Wu,et al.  A friction model of partial-EHL contacts and its application to power loss in spur gears , 1991 .

[6]  Fabrice Ville,et al.  Prediction of Power Losses Due to Tooth Friction in Gears , 2006 .

[7]  Ramiro C. Martins,et al.  Molybdenum disulphide/titanium low friction coating for gears application , 2005 .

[8]  J Kleemola,et al.  Experimental evaluation of friction between contacting discs for the simulation of gear contact , 2007 .

[9]  Klaus Michaelis,et al.  Limitations of Bench Testing for Gear Lubricants , 2001 .

[10]  Wangquan Cheng,et al.  Semi-analytical modeling of spalling life of spur and helical gears , 2001 .

[11]  D. Dowson,et al.  Elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication : the fundamentals of roller and gear lubrication , 1966 .

[13]  Determination of film thickness, pressure and temperature in elastohydrodynamic lubrication in the past 20 years in Germany , 2001 .

[14]  Jorge H.O. Seabra,et al.  Coefficient of friction in mixed film lubrication: Gears versus twin-discs , 2007 .

[15]  Bernd-Robert Höhn,et al.  Frictional behaviour of synthetic gear lubricants , 2001 .

[16]  P. Sainsot,et al.  On the two-disc machine: A polyvalent and powerful tool to study fundamental and industrial problems related to elastohydrodynamic lubrication , 2001 .

[17]  Mattias Widmark,et al.  Effect of material, heat treatment, grinding and shot peening on contact fatigue life of carburised steels , 1999 .

[18]  Herbert S. Cheng,et al.  Empirical determination of effective lubricant rheological parameters , 1994 .

[19]  K. Michaelis,et al.  Influence of surface roughness on pressure distribution and film thickness in EHL-contacts , 2006 .

[20]  K. Johnson,et al.  Determination of gear tooth friction by disc machine , 1991 .