The Image of Touch: Construction of Meaning and Task Performance in Virtual Environments

One of the central questions in sensory interaction is how an image of the environment is constructed. In this chapter we report results of a series of studies conducted in a telesurgery system, aimed at exploring the underpinning cognitive process of construction of meaning through haptic dynamic patterns. We use a double analysis, the first rooted in behavioral methodology and the second rooted in signal processing methodologies, to validate the existence of a haptic language, and apply the results to challenging contexts in which haptic cues are on a subliminal level, in order to identify if and what is the role of subliminal cues in a haptic perceptual primitive language. We show that although participants are not aware of subliminal cues, nevertheless both action and perception are affected, suggesting that meaning is extracted from subliminal haptic patterns. Conclusion suggests a unified framework of a haptic language mechanism for construction of mental models of the environment, rooted in the embodied cognition, and enactive theoretical framework.

[1]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[2]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Marcos Hilsenrat,et al.  The impact of subliminal haptic perception on the preference discrimination of roughness and compliance , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Development as a dynamic system , 1992, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.

[8]  E. Reingold,et al.  Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[10]  Marcos Hilsenrat,et al.  The impact of unaware perception on bodily interaction in virtual reality environments , 2009 .

[11]  John A. Groeger,et al.  Qualitatively Different Effects of Undetected and Unidentified Auditory Primes , 1988 .

[12]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Seeing Shapes and Hearing Textures: Two Neural Categories of Touch , 2011 .

[13]  A. Clark Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[14]  J. Gyoba,et al.  Visual and tactile cross-modal mere exposure effects , 2008 .

[15]  A. Karni,et al.  Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: Task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli , 2009, Brain Research.

[16]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visual recognition of shapes and textures: an fMRi study , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[17]  Lawrence A. Shapiro Embodied Cognition , 2010 .

[18]  P. Green,et al.  Telepresence surgery , 1995 .

[19]  E. Rosch,et al.  The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 1993 .

[20]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.