Consumer Preference Segments for Plant-Based Foods: The Role of Product Category

A survey of willingness to consume (WTC) 5 types of plant-based (PB) food was conducted in USA, Australia, Singapore and India (n = 2494). In addition to WTC, emotional, conceptual and situational use characterizations were obtained. Results showed a number of distinct clusters of consumers with different patterns of WTC for PB foods within different food categories. A large group of consumers did not discriminate among PB foods across the various food categories. Six smaller, but distinct clusters of consumers had specific patterns of WTC across the examined food categories. In general, PB Milk and, to a much lesser extent, PB Cheese had highest WTC ratings. PB Fish had the lowest WTC, and two PB meat products had intermediate WTC. Emotional, conceptual and situational use characterizations exerted significant lifts/penalties on WTC. No penalty or lifts were imparted on WTC by the situational use of ‘moving my diet in a sustainable direction’, whereas uses related to ‘when I want something I like’ and ‘when I want something healthy’ generally imparted WTC lifts across clusters and food categories. The importance of this research for the study of PB foods is its demonstration that consumers are not monolithic in their willingness to consume these foods and that WTC is often a function of the food category of the PB food.

[1]  P. Varela,et al.  Insects as food and feed in Portugal and Norway – cross-cultural comparison of determinants of acceptance , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[2]  A. Pasqualone Balancing Innovation and Neophobia in the Production of Food for Plant-Based Diets , 2022, Foods.

[3]  M. McSweeney,et al.  Consumer perception and emotional responses to plant-based cheeses. , 2022, Food research international.

[4]  K. Jouppila,et al.  Flavor challenges in extruded plant-based meat alternatives: A review. , 2022, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[5]  A. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Choice Architecture Effects on Indulgent Consumption: Evidence from Combinations of Nudges at an Ice-Cream Store , 2022, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[6]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Approaching 100 years of Sensory and Consumer Science: Developments and ongoing issues , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[7]  J. Klink-Lehmann,et al.  Exploring factors determining German consumers’ intention to eat meat alternatives , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[8]  F. Llobell,et al.  Plant-based alternatives vs. dairy milk: Consumer segments and their sensory, emotional, cognitive and situational use responses to tasted products , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[9]  J. Dupont,et al.  Acceptance of Insect-Based Food Products in Western Societies: A Systematic Review , 2022, Frontiers in Nutrition.

[10]  F. Boukid,et al.  Vegan Egg: A Future-Proof Food Ingredient? , 2022, Foods.

[11]  P. Schlich,et al.  Sensory acceptability of new plant protein meat substitutes , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[12]  C. Riedy,et al.  The Evolution of Urban Australian Meat-Eating Practices , 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[13]  D. Valentin,et al.  Meat replacer? No thanks! The clash between naturalness and processing: An explorative study of the perception of plant-based foods , 2021, Appetite.

[14]  F. Llobell,et al.  “Beyond liking” measures in food-related consumer research supplement hedonic responses and improve ability to predict consumption , 2021, Food Quality and Preference.

[15]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Food neophobia modulates importance of food choice motives: replication, extension, and behavioural validation , 2021, Food Quality and Preference.

[16]  H. Dagevos,et al.  Positive Emotions Explain Increased Intention to Consume Five Types of Alternative Proteinxs between 2015 and 2019 , 2021, Food Quality and Preference.

[17]  T. Gallina Toschi,et al.  Sensory perception and food neophobia drive liking of functional plant‐based food enriched with winemaking by‐products , 2021, Journal of Sensory Studies.

[18]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Barriers to consumption of plant-based beverages: A comparison of product users and non-users on emotional, conceptual, situational, conative and psychographic variables. , 2021, Food research international.

[19]  A. Nolden,et al.  Plant-Based Cheeses: A Systematic Review of Sensory Evaluation Studies and Strategies to Increase Consumer Acceptance , 2021, Foods.

[20]  P. Luning,et al.  Situational appropriateness of meat products, meat substitutes and meat alternatives as perceived by Dutch consumers , 2021 .

[21]  A. Tárrega,et al.  Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations , 2021, Foods.

[22]  J. Weiss,et al.  Preferences of German Consumers for Meat Products Blended with Plant-Based Proteins , 2021, Sustainability.

[23]  M. Reinders,et al.  A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat , 2020, Appetite.

[24]  S. Grasso,et al.  Part Meat and Part Plant: Are Hybrid Meat Products Fad or Future? , 2020, Foods.

[25]  Jared Piazza,et al.  Consumer perceptions of conventional and alternative protein sources: A mixed-methods approach with meal and product framing , 2020, Appetite.

[26]  Jiang-ho He,et al.  A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes. , 2020, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[27]  Martina Fiorentini,et al.  Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review , 2020, Foods.

[28]  J. Lusk,et al.  Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? , 2020, Food Policy.

[29]  F. Perez-Cueto,et al.  Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future , 2020, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[30]  M. Forleo,et al.  The potential of edible seaweed within the western diet. A segmentation of Italian consumers , 2020 .

[31]  K. Grunert,et al.  Disgusting or delicious? Examining attitudinal ambivalence towards entomophagy among Danish consumers , 2020, Food Quality and Preference.

[32]  H. Tuorila,et al.  Consumer responses to novel and unfamiliar foods , 2020, Current Opinion in Food Science.

[33]  D. Thomson Predicting Purchase and Consumption of New Products , 2020, Handbook of Eating and Drinking.

[34]  P. Marešová,et al.  Use of Social Media Platforms among Adults in the United States—Behavior on Social Media , 2020 .

[35]  Brian Manata,et al.  Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[36]  S. Fiszman,et al.  Are mixed meat and vegetable protein products good alternatives for reducing meat consumption? A case study with burgers , 2020, Current Research in Food Science.

[37]  J. Lahne,et al.  Investigating the role of health halos and reactance in ice cream choice , 2020 .

[38]  N. Consedine,et al.  It’s not queasy being green: The role of disgust in willingness-to-pay for more sustainable product alternatives , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[39]  R. Weinrich,et al.  Preference and willingness to pay for meat substitutes based on micro-algae , 2019, Appetite.

[40]  J. Aschemann‐Witzel,et al.  Consumer perception of plant-based proteins: The value of source transparency for alternative protein ingredients , 2019, Food Hydrocolloids.

[41]  E. Iannuzzi,et al.  The willingness to consume insect-based food: an empirical research on Italian consumers , 2019, Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika).

[42]  Florian Fiebelkorn,et al.  Acceptance of insects as food in Germany: Is it about sensation seeking, sustainability consciousness, or food disgust? , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[43]  O. Meixner,et al.  Cow Milk versus Plant-Based Milk Substitutes: A Comparison of Product Image and Motivational Structure of Consumption , 2019, Sustainability.

[44]  U. Hamm,et al.  The role of species for the acceptance of edible insects: evidence from a consumer survey , 2019, British Food Journal.

[45]  Cristina A. Godinho,et al.  Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions , 2019, Trends in Food Science & Technology.

[46]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Older Consumers’ Readiness to Accept Alternative, More Sustainable Protein Sources in the European Union , 2019, Nutrients.

[47]  S. Jaeger,et al.  The item-by-use (IBU) method for measuring perceived situational appropriateness: A methodological characterisation using CATA questions , 2019 .

[48]  B. V. Mierlo,et al.  Meat alternatives: an integrative comparison , 2019, Trends in Food Science & Technology.

[49]  F. Antonioli,et al.  Exploring consumers' attitude towards cultured meat in Italy. , 2019, Meat science.

[50]  Sterenn Lucas,et al.  Seaweed Consumption and Label Preferences in France , 2019, Marine Resource Economics.

[51]  Lukas Kornher,et al.  Disgusting or Innovative-Consumer Willingness to Pay for Insect Based Burger Patties in Germany , 2019, Sustainability.

[52]  I. Biasato,et al.  The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[53]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Willingness to consume insect-containing foods: A survey in the United States , 2019, LWT.

[54]  Riccardo Vecchio,et al.  Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[55]  C. Bryant,et al.  A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China , 2019, Front. Sustain. Food Syst..

[56]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Testing potential psychological predictors of attitudes towards cultured meat , 2019, Appetite.

[57]  R. Robison,et al.  Exploring perceptions of sustainable proteins and meat attachment , 2019, British Food Journal.

[58]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[59]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Impact of sustainability perception on consumption of organic meat and meat substitutes , 2019, Appetite.

[60]  D. Birch,et al.  Who Eats Seaweed? An Australian Perspective , 2018, Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing.

[61]  C. Gallen,et al.  Cognitive acceptance mechanisms of discontinuous food innovations: The case of insects in France , 2018, Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition).

[62]  J. Kearney,et al.  Excessive Food Consumption in Irish Adults: Implications for Climatic Sustainability and Public Health , 2018 .

[63]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  The Determinants of the Adoption Intention of Eco-friendly Functional Food in Different Market Segments , 2018, Ecological Economics.

[64]  H. Aiking,et al.  The next protein transition☆ , 2018, Trends in Food Science & Technology.

[65]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Meat consumption, health, and the environment , 2018, Science.

[66]  Peter Slade If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers , 2018, Appetite.

[67]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers , 2018, Science.

[68]  Keith S. Evans,et al.  Consumer preferences for seafood attributes of wild-harvested and farm-raised products , 2018 .

[69]  Bernadette Sütterlin,et al.  Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat. , 2018, Meat science.

[70]  M. Borkovcová,et al.  Acceptability and sensory evaluation of energy bars and protein bars enriched with edible insect , 2018 .

[71]  R. Neff,et al.  Reducing meat consumption in the USA: a nationally representative survey of attitudes and behaviours , 2018, Public Health Nutrition.

[72]  K. Grunert,et al.  Understanding Westerners’ disgust for the eating of insects: The role of food neophobia and implicit associations , 2018 .

[73]  A. Fischer,et al.  All insects are equal, but some insects are more equal than others , 2018, British food journal.

[74]  M. Stieger,et al.  Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions , 2017 .

[75]  M. Drake,et al.  Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk? , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[76]  A. Spiller,et al.  The Value of Environmental and Health Claims on New Legume Products: A Non-Hypothetical Online Auction , 2017 .

[77]  Davide Menozzi,et al.  Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product , 2017 .

[78]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Healthy, sustainable and plant-based eating : perceived (mis)match and involvement-based consumer segments as targets for future policy , 2017 .

[79]  Christina Hartmann,et al.  Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review , 2017 .

[80]  H. Tobi,et al.  Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat , 2017, Appetite.

[81]  T. Otterbring,et al.  The effects of consumer knowledge on the willingness to buy insect food: An exploratory cross-regional study in Northern and Central Europe , 2016, Food Quality and Preference.

[82]  Pete Smith,et al.  The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review , 2016, PloS one.

[83]  M. Niva,et al.  From beef to beans: Eating motives and the replacement of animal proteins with plant proteins among Finnish consumers , 2016, Appetite.

[84]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Determinants of consumer intention to purchase animal-friendly milk. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[85]  C. Proserpio,et al.  School children preferences for fish formulations: The impact of child and parental food neophobia , 2016 .

[86]  H. Steur,et al.  Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions , 2016 .

[87]  A. Ali A Semiotic Approach to Entomophagy , 2016 .

[88]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Becoming an Insectivore: Results of an Experiment , 2016 .

[89]  S. Agrawal,et al.  Dietary patterns in India: a systematic review , 2016, British Journal of Nutrition.

[90]  H. Griffiths,et al.  The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture , 2016 .

[91]  S. Balzan,et al.  Edible insects and young adults in a north-east Italian city an exploratory study , 2016 .

[92]  M. Siegrist,et al.  The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China , 2015 .

[93]  V. Toepoel,et al.  Straightlining in Web survey panels over time , 2015 .

[94]  P. Luning,et al.  Appropriateness, acceptance and sensory preferences based on visual information: A web-based survey on meat substitutes in a meal context , 2015 .

[95]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Examining heterogeneity in elderly consumers’ acceptance of carriers for protein-enriched food: A segmentation study , 2015 .

[96]  D. Thomson,et al.  Application of conceptual profiling in brand, packaging and product development , 2015 .

[97]  Rosaria Viscecchia,et al.  Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies , 2015, Appetite.

[98]  L. Zinkiewicz,et al.  Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians , 2015, Appetite.

[99]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health , 2014, Nature.

[100]  C. Tucker,et al.  The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption , 2014, Appetite.

[101]  H. Aiking Protein production: planet, profit, plus people? , 2014, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[102]  M. Sutton,et al.  Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake , 2014 .

[103]  D. Thomson,et al.  Development and evaluation of measurement tools for conceptual profiling of unbranded products , 2014 .

[104]  John C. Castura,et al.  Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data , 2013 .

[105]  P. Luning,et al.  Exploring meat substitutes: consumer experiences and contextual factors , 2013 .

[106]  J. Boer,et al.  Motivational differences in food orientation and the choice of snacks made from lentils, locusts, seaweed or “hybrid” meat , 2013 .

[107]  H. Westhoek,et al.  The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes , 2012 .

[108]  N. Barberis Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment , 2012 .

[109]  D. Birch,et al.  Buying seafood: Understanding barriers to purchase across consumption segments , 2012 .

[110]  W. Engels,et al.  Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance , 2011, Appetite.

[111]  P. Luning,et al.  Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context , 2011 .

[112]  Harry Aiking,et al.  Future protein supply , 2011 .

[113]  C. Kermarrec,et al.  Reliability and predictive validity of the Food Technology Neophobia Scale , 2010, Appetite.

[114]  David N. Cox,et al.  Construction and validation of a psychometric scale to measure consumers' fears of novel food technologies: The food technology neophobia scale , 2008 .

[115]  J. Boer,et al.  Towards more sustainable food choices: Value priorities and motivational orientations , 2007 .

[116]  D. Crawford,et al.  Australian Adult Consumers’ Beliefs About Plant Foods: A Qualitative Study , 2005, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[117]  D. Ariely,et al.  When Do Losses Loom Larger than Gains? , 2005 .

[118]  L. Serra-Majem,et al.  Food preferences of Spanish children and young people: the enKid study , 2003, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[119]  J. Hintze,et al.  Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism , 1998 .

[120]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[121]  P. Pliner,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans , 1992, Appetite.

[122]  A. Cardello,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOY PARTICLE SIZE AND COLOR ON THE SENSORY PROPERTIES OF GROUND BEEF PATTIES , 1983 .

[123]  L. Tornatzky,et al.  A Scale for Assessing Attitudes toward Environmental Quality , 1977 .

[124]  M. P. Maloney,et al.  A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. , 1975 .

[125]  S. Jaeger,et al.  Factors affecting data quality of online questionnaires: Issues and metrics for sensory and consumer research , 2022, Food Quality and Preference.

[126]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Consumers’ associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant-based meat alternatives , 2021 .

[127]  K. Grunert,et al.  A self-report measure of attitudes toward the eating of insects: construction and validation of the Entomophagy Attitude Questionnaire , 2020 .

[128]  Mark F. Lang Consumer acceptance of blending plant-based ingredients into traditional meat-based foods: Evidence from the meat-mushroom blend , 2020 .

[129]  K. Jonas,et al.  Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies , 2020 .

[130]  B. Urbano,et al.  Towards Food Security of Alternative Dietary Proteins: a Comparison between Spain and the Dominican Republic , 2019, www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro.

[131]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  A qualitative exploration of the factors underlying seniors' receptiveness to entomophagy. , 2018, Food research international.

[132]  A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi,et al.  Climate change and livestock: Impacts, adaptation, and mitigation , 2017 .

[133]  G. Lippi,et al.  Meat consumption and cancer risk: a critical review of published meta-analyses. , 2016, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[134]  L. Hudders,et al.  Meat morals: relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior. , 2015, Meat science.

[135]  G. Ares,et al.  Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice: experimental considerations and impact on outcome , 2015 .

[136]  W. Verbeke Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society , 2015 .

[137]  C. Sundberg,et al.  Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production , 2013 .

[138]  F. Clavel-Chapelon,et al.  Energy intake and sources of energy intake in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition , 2009, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[139]  L. Lebart,et al.  Which Bootstrap for Principal Axes Methods , 2007 .

[140]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[141]  G. De Soete,et al.  Clustering and Classification , 2019, Data-Driven Science and Engineering.

[142]  A. Cardello,et al.  Consumer Evaluation of the Sensory Properties of Fish , 1988 .